[Luis Gonzalez]

From you own post, the text of the resolution:

On October 18, 2004, the Defendant Dover Area School Board of Directors passed by a 6-3 vote the following resolution:

Students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design.

Not could be, may be, or should be...WILL BE made aware.

That's a mandate to teach something that regardless of how you look at it, can be nothing but creationism in disguise.

Unless of course any proponent of intelligent design wants to stand up and make his or her case for creation being the work of a super being named Q, who one day will stand judgement of humanity at some place called Farpoint.

[onewhowatches]

the work of a super being named Q, who one day will stand judgement of humanity at some place called Farpoint.

Qdidit!

[jwalsh07]

"Intelligent Design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin’s view. The reference book, Of Pandas and People, is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what Intelligent Design actually involves."

ID was not part of the curriculum, period. There is no argument here. Uttering the word ID or God in science class is not unconstitutional in America.

Argue the facts Luis, there was no curriculum involving the study of intelligent design. If there was, it would have been produced in court. It wasn't.