[Ol' Dan Tucker]

I reckon I could. For now it only matters what you yourself wrote, namely that science is to be strictly about proofs.

Yup. What proofs are being offered to support ID?

It would be better if you did not infer from my own writings that I claim intelligent design to be scientifically provable.

Do you believe ID to be 'science' or 'scientifically provable'?

The only thing obvious is that the notion intelligent design irks evolutionists enough that they want to make a federal case of it.

Since ID could not make it's case in a court of law, why should it be presented in school as something it's not?

[Fester Chugabrew]

What proofs are being offered to support ID?

The same "proofs" that are being offered to support evolution, only different.