Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
They mean Darwin was smart enough to weasel his way out of directly endorsing a controversial publication. Some might call it "testifying inconsistently."

There is no weaseling and nothing inconsistent in Darwin's position.

I shd prefer the Part or Volume not to be dedicated to me (though I thank you for the intended honour) as this implies to a certain extent my approval of the general publication, about which I know nothing...

1,478 posted on 12/20/2005 6:14:04 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1438 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro

Darwin says, "though I thank you for the honor," when under his breath he was probably muttering, "lest I be shot." At any rate, these words indicate Darwin wanted to distance himself from the author. But why would Marx want to dedicate a book, or volume, to Darwin? I happen to think Darwin did not really write what was on his mind, but measured his words so as to avoid a confrontation. Shall we put him on a stand and make him take an oath?


1,710 posted on 12/21/2005 5:14:46 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1478 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson