The criticism is valid or it is not.
The ID math says that it is.
There's some math, so far poorly explained, that says that the ID math isn't all it's cracked up to be.
What ID math?
You're the one who can't provide a link to this supposed "not enough time for evolution" argument.
The main problem with mathematical arguments against abiogenesis (there are none against evolution) is that we don't know how abiogenesis might have worked. So the math can't be done at all.
Garbage in, garbage out.