Do you agree with the sentiment expressed by Buchanan in this article whennhe says: "Where is Bush? All wrapped up in the issue of whether women in Najaf will have the same rights in divorce and custody cases as women in Nebraska. "
I and my immigration reform and border security advocate friends campaigned for George W. Bush, voted for George W. Bush, and still support George W. Bush on almost every issue except for, most noteably, his support for granting amnesty to illegal aliens (despite what he wants to call it) and rewarding them with jobs, benefits, and eventual U.S. citizenship. We support the War on Terror both in Iraq and Afghanistan and anywhere else where the war should be prosecuted. You will find that Tancredo's position is consistant with mine, despite your blatant slander.
I disagree with Buchanan's article as I've disagreed with a number of his statements and articles. Despite your constant lies and distortions, Pat Buchanan has little or nothing to do with the border security and immigration reform movement. He's a non player. You attempts to associate him with Tom Tancredo and other border security and immigration reform advocates is pure nonsense.
But don't let any of that stop your continuous lying and trolling on Free Republic. That's all you quislings are good for. Dane was banned for the same crap earlier today. I hope you're next. You are a pollutant - the scum that grows on the edges of Free Republic. Your constant lies and attacks and your constant shilling for the criminal invaders and their enablers has marginalized you and your opinion beyond what you want to admit.
I noticed you didn't explain what you have against "Nigerians and a half dozen other types."
Should we take this to mean that you are admitting to being pro-illegal immigration? Why don't you want to answer the question?.