Replies

It's to reinsert; they are claiming the 11th erred, according to MSNBC.

Parents saying they need to look at de novo? That's what Dan Abrams is saying on MSNBC. Abrams says the 11th is saying they deserve to be heard? Why didn't they address this before?

Makes no sense to me. The play before was about granting an injucntion, or an All Writs order keeping the case from becoming moot. Denial was based on the finding that the Schlinders didn't have a viable federal claim, in essence. Maybe the en banc court thinks there is a viable substantive due process claim (inserted in the amended complaint). If so, and what I thought I read 3 days ago that Gibbs was not going to ask for an en back review, then we are in Shakespearean tragedy territory. I guess our speculation is just wasting bandwidth. I hope my take is wrong. Indeed if I were not a confirmed near atheist, I would frame it that I "pray" that I am wrong.