Well, after reading that, one gets the idea that ‘evolution’ is a nebulous thing; sort of like looking at a impressionist’s painting, whereby one must stand back from the work and turn their a certain way, before they can fully appreciate it’s nuance.
Dawkins apparently has a ‘better eye’ for this ‘art’ than myself.
Omar.
"Well, after reading that, one gets the idea that ‘evolution’ is a nebulous thing; sort of like looking at a impressionist’s"
Somewhat like the math of fractals.
No two mountains are alike, yet we can stand back and readily see, they are indeed mountains.