[phoenix0468]

but it is reasonable to say that evolution is thoroughly supported by a vast weight of scientific evidence and research.
spitlana wrote:
poppycock

...........................................

Evolutionists will always use the words evidence and research when we know it is really conjecture and findings. Just as evolution is supposed to have taken millions of years, the evolutionist can use this to as a stalling point to their own arguments. Well, I must disagree and say that their is evidence of many stories in the bible and other great civilizations. One being the great flood. This is a "myth" that is a part of every major civilizaion on earth. Hmmm, could that be evidence or conjecture?

[Dimensio]

This is a "myth" that is a part of every major civilizaion on earth.

Well, except for Chinese civilization. And quite a few others that didn't happen to live in regions subject to regular floods.

Odd that Chinese history has a record of a time when they should have been completely submerged. Wonder how they missed that odd detail.

[spitlana]

There is a great deal more evidence for a global flood than for evolution. If the amount of time, money, passion spent on shoving evolution down everyone's throat since the mid 1800's, were spent on uncovering and publishing evidence of a global flood--we all would be ROFL our guts out at the stupid theory of evolution. Instead, we've swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. God bless Mr. Johnson for exposing the centuries old lie. He is a courgeous, fabulous scientist--who has dared to declare that the world is round.