Symantics. Prosecutors and defenders in criminal cases tell stories about what happened. These stories are put to the test. People go to jail and even die as a result of juries accepting one story or another.
Foensics is a science, and evolution is based on forensic evidence. It will never be proven true, but it has more supporting evidence than any criminal case has ever had.
Semantics. Yes. I told you what I meant by "story telling," namely fabrications of the imagination, so that you would not confuse the issue. Criminal justice is carried out in the present day with evidence to support a representation of history as best understood by the same. Evolutionist propositions depending upon "millions of years" have NO eyewitness testimony, let alone a human record, and thus may be treated as stories that are plausible at best . . unlike the great flood.