No. I figure the aquatic critters would more likely be found at the bottom, but not necessarily. Creatures made to inhabit the lower parts of the earth are more likely to be found there. But with forty days and forty nights of torrential rain unlike the earth has ever seen or will ever see again what should one expect? Normalcy WRT to the laws of physics, but irregularity in the manner and degree of their application. The result? Both overall consistency and irregularities, just like the fossil record.
What proof do you have that forty days and forty nights of rain would produce the interpretation of the Bible you espouse? (I say proof because he keeps asking us to prove stuff)
How come you keep citing the laws of Physics, when you obviously don't know what they are? Things that make you go Hmmmmmmm...
So, basically what you are saying is that no observation in the fossil record would convince you that your idea is not correct. This again, therefore, is not a scientific theory. If I am wrong, then please tell me what observation would make you conclude that you are wrong.