Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
This actually brings up another interesting Constitutional question as well: why is it that you can be tried for the same crime by states and by the feds? This amounts to double-jeopardy.
29 posted on 11/06/2003 12:14:29 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ellery
It's explained as "same act, different offense".

With Rodney King it was (state) assault and (federal) civil rights violations (to be free from unreasonable force, to be safe while in custody, and not to be punished without a trial).

One can then ask, if the cops were found not guilty of the first, then how can they be guilty of the second? Easy. The federal jury only has to reject the findings of the state jury.

IMO, this is double jeopardy. Simply calling the act (the beating) two different offenses doesn't make it so. The cops were railroaded.

Also, I think if they were found guilty in the first trial, the second, federal, trial would never have been called.

30 posted on 11/06/2003 1:34:02 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson