Keyword: theeconomist

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The rise of the Obamacons (Economist barf)

    10/25/2008 7:31:28 AM PDT · by stan_sipple · 28 replies · 472+ views
    Economist.com ^ | 10-23-2008 | Lexington
    Mr Powell is now a four-star general in America’s most surprising new army: the Obamacons. The army includes other big names such as Susan Eisenhower, Dwight’s granddaughter, who introduced Mr Obama at the Democratic National Convention and Christopher Buckley, the son of the conservative icon William Buckley, who complains that he has not left the Republican Party: the Republican Party has left him. Chuck Hagel, a Republican senator from Nebraska and one-time bosom buddy of Mr McCain has also flirted heavily with the movement, though he has refrained from issuing an official endorsement.The biggest brigade in the Obamacon army consists...
  • God and the 'Economist'--Religion and Hubris

    11/27/2007 1:55:10 PM PST · by Mr. Silverback · 11 replies · 43+ views
    Breakpoint with Chuck Colson ^ | 11/27/2007 | Chuck Colson
    On the eve of the new millennium, the prestigious Economist magazine published what amounted to an obituary for belief in God. Fast forward to November 2007: The cover story of a recent issue of the magazine is titled, “In God’s Name.” In it, the editors admit that they were wrong eight years ago and tell their readers that “religion will play a big role in this century’s politics.” What happened to change their minds? For starters, they began looking through the correct end of the telescope. In 1999, the magazine cited the many different conceptions of God as possible evidence...
  • Wars of Religion?--The 'Economist' Gets It Wrong

    11/28/2007 2:26:22 PM PST · by Mr. Silverback · 5 replies · 31+ views
    Breakpoint with Chuck Colson ^ | 11/28/2007 | Chuck Colson
    As part of the Economist magazine’s coverage of religion’s role in the twenty-first century, a recent story covers the “new wars of religion.” The magazine’s emphasis on religion represents a nearly 180-degree turn from the publication’s 1999 declaration that belief in God had “passed into history.” But while the magazine is looking in the right direction, it does not understand what it is seeing. The graphic accompanying the story could not be less subtle: an arm reaching down from heaven holding a hand grenade. According to the story, “faith will unsettle politics everywhere this century; it will do so least...
  • Illegal, but useful [ACLU working with Tyson Foods in new immigration group]

    11/01/2007 7:22:47 PM PDT · by lonewacko_dot_com · 20 replies · 22+ views
    The Economist ^ | 11/1/07 | The Economist
    THIS week executives from some of Arkansas's principal companies—Tyson Foods, the world's largest meat processor, Alltel, a wireless company, and Stephens, one of the biggest investment firms outside Wall Street—joined ministers, civic leaders and the local American Civil Liberties Union to form the Arkansas Friendship Coalition. The group, led by Steve Copley, a Methodist minister, stresses that states should abide by federal immigration laws rather than try to make their own. This sudden respect for the wisdom of Washington has been prompted by anti-immigration laws passed in Arkansas's neighbours, Oklahoma and Missouri... ...In answer to critics, the Arkansas Friendship Coalition...
  • Like Abortion Groups "The Economist" Hopes Vatican will Lose its Status at United Nations

    08/24/2007 12:01:03 AM PDT · by monomaniac · 2 replies · 206+ views
    LifeSiteNews.com ^ | August 22, 2007 | John-Henry Westen
    Like Abortion Groups "The Economist" Hopes Vatican will Lose its Status at United Nations Call ignores fact that all but 9 Muslim and 4 Communist nations have formal diplomatic relations with Vatican By John-Henry Westen NEW YORK, August 22, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Vatican has reacted to a suggestion contained in a July 19 issue of "The Economist", one of the world's leading current affairs weeklies.  Produced in the UK and controlled by the Financial Times, The Economist - the articles of which are always left unsigned since they represent a collective view - called on the Vatican to remove...
  • The Economist's Surrender

    01/12/2006 4:17:56 AM PST · by unionblue83 · 3 replies · 543+ views
    Front Page Magazine ^ | 12 January 2006 | Robert Spencer
    Several weeks ago I wrote about how some cartoons of Muhammad in a Danish newspaper became an international incident. At stake is much more than some cartoons; this matter has become a test case for the continued viability of freedom of speech in Western countries. And now The Economist has written about the story in a way that reveals the biases and false assumptions so prevalent in the public discourse today. As Islamic terrorism and jihad violence spread all over the globe, The Economist has doggedly maintained its tone of blame-the-West-first dhimmitude. Instead of seeing the cartoon controversy as another...
  • American Immigration: Dreaming of the other side of the wire

    03/14/2005 4:25:15 PM PST · by thegreatbeast · 1 replies · 244+ views
    The Economist ^ | March 10th, 2005 | Not Given
    ... The reason is simple: the supply of visas does not begin to meet the demand for them. The law provides 675,000 visas a year for permanent residence in the United States: of these, 480,000 are available for the family members of American citizens and existing legal residents, and another 140,000 are based on employment. In addition, refugees can be given permanent visas for humanitarian reasons (the ceiling for fiscal year 2004 was 70,000) and there are 50,000 “diversity” visas, available by lottery for citizens of countries that have sent fewer than 50,000 migrants in the previous five years. ....
  • The incompetent or the incoherent? (The Economist endorses Kerry, switches from 2000)

    10/28/2004 11:19:29 AM PDT · by Cableguy · 48 replies · 1,663+ views
    The Economist ^ | 10/28/04
    With a heavy heart, we think American readers should vote for John Kerry on November 2nd YOU might have thought that, three years after a devastating terrorist attack on American soil, a period which has featured two wars, radical political and economic legislation, and an adjustment to one of the biggest stockmarket crashes in history, the campaign for the presidency would be an especially elevated and notable affair. If so, you would be wrong. This year's battle has been between two deeply flawed men: George Bush, who has been a radical, transforming president but who has never seemed truly up...