There could well be NO Statute of Limitions concern given the following:
“In the U.S., when a lawyer or law firm fraudulently presents facts to court in a matter, the act is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.”
I have amended paragraph #18 of my Draft Indictment so as to put this “legal technicality” in to play:
18.-——In May, 2007, Mr. Campbell filed a civil complaint against Defendants SIMCOX, LEWIS, KUNZ, and SHELDON alleging the fraudulent inducement of Mr. Campbell’s $100,000. donation. Defendant SIMCOX mal-appropriated $30,900. of the MCDC donors’ money to pay for the costs of these defendants’ collective defense. Additionally, Defendant Simcox, “being first duly sworn upon my oath”, fraudulently presented unconditional statements fact to the court in his attorney’s “ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT”. Likewise, Defendant Kunz (representing himself) fraudulently presented statements of fact to the court in his “MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS“. Mr. Campbell then realized the futility of attempting to obtain legal redress in the civil arena and thereafter dismissed his civil suit.