SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  ManhattanDeclaration  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Posts on 'reuters' (within 6 hours)

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • INTERVIEW-Climate science untarnished by hacked emails-IPCC ( From Nov 27 )

    11/30/2009 12:24:42 AM PST · 44 of 44
    TChad to Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Something I have noticed about the MSM coverage of Climate: the source data is rarely quoted. Few email quotes, no Harry the programmer quotes. All spin, no source. Mustn't clue the rubes.

    Here's Harry the CRU programmer in his code comments:

    "...getting seriously fed up with the state of the Australian data. so many new stations have been introduced, so many false references.. so many changes that aren't documented. Every time a cloud forms I'm presented with a bewildering selection of similar-sounding sites, some with references, some with WMO codes, and some with both. And if I look up the station metadata with one of the local references, chances are the WMO code will be wrong (another station will have it) and the lat/lon will be wrong too."

    And this:

    "OH (expletive) THIS. It's Sunday evening, I've worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done I'm hitting yet another problem that's based on the hopeless state of our databases. There is no uniform data integrity, it's just a catalogue of issues that continues to grow as they're found."

    Yet the MSM still has absolute faith in the quality of the CRU's work. Yup, environmentalism is a religion.

    Good Climategate stuff:

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/climategate-hide-the-decline-codified/