SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  StatesRights  WOT  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Elections  Obama  ACORN  TalkRadio  CopyrightList  Rally  WalterReed  TeaParty  TeaPartyExpress  TeaPartyRebellion  MarchOnDC  FreeperConvention  Donate 

Contribute to FR: $10 $20 $50 $100 Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Active Articles: nyt (within 6 hours)

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • NYTimes: We Won't Publish "Statements that Were Never Intended for the Public Eye."

    11/22/2009 7:08:14 PM PST · by gusopol3 · 50 replies · 1,497+ views
    Weekly Standard ^ | November 22, 2009 | Michael Goldfarb
    This is the position of the New York Times when given the chance to publish sensitive information that might hinder the liberal agenda. Of course, when the choice is between publishing classified information that might endanger the lives of U.S. troops in the field or intelligence programs vital to national security, that information is published without hesitation by the nation's paper of record.