Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $13,335
16%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 16%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: everify

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • E-Verify says Obama not eligible for employment in the United States

    09/11/2011 4:20:26 PM PDT · by EternalVigilance · 72 replies
    The Steady Drip ^ | Sunday, September 11, 2011 | Sam Sewell
    E-Verify is an Internet-based system operated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA). E-Verify is currently free to employers and is available in all 50 states. E-Verify provides an automated link to federal databases to help employers determine employment eligibility of new hires and the validity of their Social Security numbers. If you were an employer and entered Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number 042-68-4425 into the data base to verify that he was eligible for employment in the United States you could not legally hire him. Here is what e-verify would tell you about...
  • Assemblymember Fong Statement on Federal Bill Mandating Use of E-Verify (Moonbat wants no E-Verify)

    09/07/2011 7:07:22 PM PDT · by wac3rd · 5 replies · 1+ views
    Assemblyman Paul Fong's website ^ | 9-7-11 | Paul Fong Website
    SACRAMENTO - Assemblymember Paul Fong (D-Cupertino) today issued the following statement regarding the federal E-Verify mandate bill by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas): Assemblymember Fong: Rep. Smith's E-Verify mandate bill deeply concerns me. I do not support any flawed mandated system that costs jobs. E-verify was intended to be a voluntary process and requiring businesses to interview and hire in accordance with this faulty system is not in the best interest of businesses or workers. I've introduced a bill in the California Legislature, AB 1236 that addresses the problems with E-Verify. E-verify has mistakenly identified U.S. citizens as non-citizens which prevents...
  • Perry on Immigration: Worse than you think

    09/06/2011 12:36:35 AM PDT · by MN_Mike · 84 replies · 1+ views
    The Daily Caller ^ | September 6, 2011 | Mickey Kaus
    Rick Perry’s record on immigration isn’t as bad as I thought. It’s worse! … It’s not just that he doesn’t want to build the border fence. Many fence opponents argue (though I disagree) that it’s far more important to take away the “jobs magnet” that lures illegals to try to cross the border in the first place. But Perry hasn’t supported the quickest, best way to take away the jobs magnet, which is to require all private employers to use the “E-Verify” electronic check of Social Security numbers. Perry wouldn’t even require his own state government to use E-Verify, let...
  • Arpaio Deputies Raid Phoenix Restaurants, Arrest 7 for ID Theft (Sheriff Joe's Jobs Program)

    09/03/2011 8:19:53 AM PDT · by montag813 · 31 replies
    Stand With Arizona ^ | 09-03-2011 | John Hill
    by John HillStand With ArizonaSheriff Joe and his deputies conducted a raid on 2 Mexican restaurants in Phoenix, arresting 7 illegal aliens for identity theft. It was Arpaio's 53rd such raid. "Stealing people's identity is a Class 4 felony, a very serious crime," Arpaio said. "With the unemployment problem, maybe they will hire legitimate U.S. citizens now to fill the five vacancies here and not hire those in this country illegally." Indeed that is what often exactly what happens after an Arpaio raid: jobs are liberated for legal Americans. We call it "Sheriff Joe's Jobs Program", and it is...
  • What Rick Perry Can Teach the GOP About Immigration (Say he has a "moderate record on immigration")

    08/24/2011 5:08:50 PM PDT · by 2ndDivisionVet · 68 replies
    The Atlantic ^ | August 24, 2011 | Erica Grieder
    As he enters the Republican presidential race, Texas Gov. Rick Perry is striking some red-meat notes on the subject of immigration. Border security, he says, is a federal responsibility -- and immigration reform will have to wait until the border is secured. Invoking his beloved 10th Amendment, he proposes that in the meantime states should have some latitude to set their own course on the subject. As for Texas, he suggests, unauthorized immigration will not be treated lightly; earlier this year he called for a state law to abolish sanctuary cities, although the bill never made it to his desk....
  • Perry defends stance on Fed, immigration

    08/21/2011 4:30:39 PM PDT · by Fred · 114 replies · 1+ views
    Political Ticker - CNN ^ | 082011 | Shawna Shepherd
    clip--- As governor of the state that shares the largest border with Mexico, Perry defended his record on immigration, including his support for allowing illegal immigrants to get in-state tuition rates at Texas universities but opposing such a law on a national level. "I'm a big believer in the 10th amendment," Perry said. "Whether they allow for tuition increases or decreases or whatever it might be in that state, it needs to be the states making that decisions." Perry wouldn't wade into a national immigration reform debate, deferring to his position that those decisions should be made on the state...
  • Law and Border

    07/08/2011 12:20:49 PM PDT · by neverdem · 10 replies
    NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE ^ | July 6, 2011 | Kris W. Kobach
    Law and BorderFrom the July 4, 2011, issue of NR. On May 26, for the first time in 35 years, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on whether states may take action to stop illegal immigration. In Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, the Supreme Court upheld the Legal Arizona Workers Act of 2007 against multiple challenges claiming that it was preempted by federal law. This act requires all employers in the state to use the E-Verify Internet system to check the work authorization of new hires, and it penalizes employers who knowingly hire unauthorized aliens by suspending their...
  • Georgia Begins Enforcement of Immigration Law Today (Even with Injunction, HB87 Has Teeth)

    07/01/2011 10:44:09 AM PDT · by montag813 · 21 replies · 1+ views
    StandWithArizona.com ^ | 07-01-2011 | Ruth Owings-Goodwin
    Georgia's Arizona-style immigration law HB87 takes effect today, July 1st. Although much of the focus has been on the two parts of the Georgia immigration law that were blocked by Judge Thomas Thrash on June 27th, there is still much to celebrate with 21 of the 23 sections remaining intact. Judge Thrash has enjoined the sections of the law that would have empowered law enforcement to investigate immigration status, if a suspect were involved in another crime, and also the provision criminalizing the "transporting or harboring" of illegal aliens. Georgia Governor Nathan Deal has vowed to push forward through the...
  • Plan to expel illegal immigrants will backfire

    06/22/2011 6:11:26 AM PDT · by Technoman · 60 replies
    Mima Herold ^ | 06/22/2011 | Andres Oppenheimer
    Republicans in Congress have launched a major offensive to force several million undocumented immigrants to leave the United States with a bill that would make it mandatory for U.S. employers to electronically verify workers’ legal status. It sounds like a reasonable idea, but the way they want to do it would hurt all involved. Last week, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith , R-Texas, and 11 fellow Republicans introduced the so c-called E-Verify bill, which would require employers to use an existing Homeland Security Department database to check the legal status of newly hired employees. According to Congressional sources, it...
  • Open-Borders Groups in Panic Over 'Chairman's E-Verify Bill'

    06/21/2011 8:35:33 PM PDT · by lwoodham · 45 replies
    NumberUSA ^ | 6/21/2011 | Roy Beck
    One way to judge the likely effectiveness of Chairman Lamar Smith's national mandatory E-Verify bill is the panic it has caused among the nation's biggest promoters of illegal immigration. They attack Rep. Smith's bill because they say it will take the incomes away from large swaths of America's illegal population. Well, I guess that's the point isn't it, because those incomes will now go to unemployed American citizens and legal immigrants who already are here. The big pro-amnesty coalition called Reform Immigration FOR America screamed in its mass email: Mass firings, mass deportations
  • Lamar Smith's Legal Workforce Act (Trojan horse, or good jobs bill?)

    06/18/2011 3:02:18 PM PDT · by OddLane · 4 replies
    American Rattlesnake ^ | June 18, 211 | Gerard Perry
    One of the central points of focus for the illegal immigration debate recently has been the use by employers of the federal government’s E-Verify system for checking the immigration status of potential or existing employees. Now Lamar Smith, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has introduced a bill, H.R. 2164, which purports to mandate E-Verify use for all American employers. The merits of this legislation are pretty obvious, and have been cited by immigration enforcement and reform groups like FAIR in support of Smith’s bill. Getting corporations and businesses that have resisted the implementation of E-Verify for years to...
  • Another amnesty?: New bill hobbles border states

    06/16/2011 3:46:19 AM PDT · by lowbridge · 7 replies
    NY Post ^ | June 15, 2011 | KRIS W. KOBACH
    History is threatening to re peat itself. Twenty-five years ago, Congress passed the Simpson-Mazzoli Act (better known among conservatives as the 1986 illegal-alien amnesty), which gave a path to citizenship to illegal aliens already here in exchange for prohibiting the hiring of illegal workers -- a provision that has been enforced only sporadically. It was a raw deal for conservatives. On Tuesday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced a bill (HR 2164) to require nationwide use of the E-Verify system, which checks a job applicant's citizenship and immigration status, via the Internet, to see if he or she...
  • NPR's E-Verify Court Coverage: Fanning the Flames with Falsehoods

    06/08/2011 7:36:21 AM PDT · by yoe · 16 replies
    All Numbers USA ^ | Jume 6, 2011 | Jeremy Beck,
    The errors in National Public Radio's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-3 decision to (uphold Arizona's E-Verify law) were so blatant and verifiable that the segment would have made a good candidate for one of NPR's famous April Fools Day reports. But the falsehoods that listeners heard in the (Top Court Upholds Arizona Employer Sanctions Law) are no joke. There has been no correction in the story online, which would indicate no one within the organization caught the errors. I don't believe that "All Things Considered" intentionally lied to listeners. Supporters of unchecked illegal immigration spend millions of dollars...
  • Alabama's Tough New Immigration Law Can Withstand Legal Challenges, Experts Say

    06/11/2011 2:44:41 PM PDT · by jazusamo · 50 replies
    Fox News ^ | June 11, 2011
    Alabama's new law cracking down on illegal immigrants will likely survive legal challenges from advocacy groups that say it is unconstitutional and racist, analysts told Fox News. The law, which takes effect Sept. 1, empowers police to arrest people suspected of being an illegal immigrant if they are stopped for another reason and requires businesses and schools to verify whether workers and students are in the country lawfully. It also makes it a crime to knowingly transport or shelter illegal immigrants. As soon as Republican Gov. Robert Bentley signed the bill into law Thursday, the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law...
  • Alabama governor signs nation's toughest immigration law

    06/09/2011 12:27:36 PM PDT · by markomalley · 66 replies
    Reuters ^ | 6/9/11
    Republican Governor Robert Bentley on Thursday signed into law a crackdown on illegal immigration in Alabama that both supporters and critics consider the toughest in the nation. Under the new measure, police must detain someone they suspect of being in the country illegally if the person cannot produce proper documentation when stopped for any reason. It also will be a crime to knowingly transport or harbor someone who is in the country illegally. The law imposes penalties on businesses that knowingly employ someone without legal resident status. A company's business license could be suspended or revoked. The law requires Alabama...
  • 82% of Likely Voters Say Businesses Should be Required to Use E-Verify

    06/06/2011 7:24:28 PM PDT · by lwoodham · 10 replies
    NumbersUSA ^ | 6/6/2011 | lwoodham
    A new poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports found that 82% of likely voters think businesses should be required to use E-Verify. The poll also found that 61% of likely voters would favor a state law that shuts down businesses that repeatedly hire illegal workers. The poll was conducted after the Supreme Court's ruling last week that upholds an Arizona law that suspends a company's business license if found repeatedly hiring illegal workers. Only 12% of likely voters would oppose a nationwide mandatory E-Verify law.
  • Alabama Passes Mandatory E-Verify & Immigration Enforcement Bill

    06/03/2011 10:10:03 PM PDT · by lwoodham · 136 replies · 1+ views
    NumbersUSA ^ | 6/3/2011 | lwoodham
    Alabama Passes Mandatory E-Verify & Immigration Enforcement Bill Friday, June 3, 2011, 1:25 PM EDT An Alabama House and Senate conference committee agreed on a new bill, which both chambers have already passed, that requires the use of E-Verify by all businesses in the state and includes several immigration enforcement provisions. Should Gov. Robert Bentley sign the bill into law, it would become one of the largest state crackdowns on illegal immigration in the country. The bill requires all businesses, public and private, to begin using E-Verify effective April 1, 2012. Businesses that do not comply face suspension of its...
  • Yes, We Can Enforce. Supreme Court's Decision on E-Verify changes terms of immigration debate

    06/01/2011 7:00:28 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 8 replies
    National Review ^ | 06/01/2011 | Rich Lowry
    After it passed a robust immigration-enforcement measure last year, Arizona was practically expelled from the union. The great and good denounced the state for its Gestapo tactics. The Obama administration sued it. The professionally outraged announced boycotts. Arizona stood condemned before the world, a byword for hatred and defiance of federal law. And yet the Supreme Court last week implicitly ratified Arizona’s leadership role on immigration enforcement. It’s everyone else who is out of line, not Arizona. The Supreme Court upheld the state’s requirement that businesses use the federal E-Verify system — a database accessible through the Internet — to...
  • A Border Win For Arizona

    05/27/2011 6:25:39 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 26 replies
    IBD Editorials ^ | May 27, 2011 | Staff
    Immigration: In a victory for states' rights, the Supreme Court has upheld the state law requiring businesses to verify immigration status of employees and revoking their business licenses if they knowingly hire illegal aliens. Yes, we can control our borders, and states do have the right to protect their citizens and their own borders. That was the meaning of a 5-3 decision last Thursday by the U.S. Supreme Court validating Arizona's 2007 law requiring businesses to use E-Verify, a voluntary federal program to determine if workers are eligible to work here. The Obama administration has argued that immigration and border...
  • Haley: Obama shut down SC illegal immigration enforcement

    05/27/2011 4:08:08 PM PDT · by MontaniSemperLiberi · 28 replies
    www.postandcourier.com ^ | May 27, 2011 | Yvonne Wenger
    COLUMBIA — Gov. Nikki Haley said today that two dozen of South Carolina's illegal immigration enforcement agents were blocked by the Obama administration from enforcing the state's law. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, part of President Barack Obama's Cabinet, told the state it could not use E-Verify documentation to enforce South Carolina's immigration law. But Thursday's U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a similar law in Arizona upheld a state's right to rely the online system that uses Social Security numbers to screens new workers to see if they are legally in the country. Haley said Obama is getting in...