Keyword: conventionofstates

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Christian Pastor to Wisconsin Committee on Article V: "Your Duty is Interposition!"

    03/29/2017 9:36:46 AM PDT · by ReformedMedia · 10 replies
    The Washington Standard ^ | 03-29-2017 | Tim Brown
    Christian pastor and author Matt Trewhella, echoed my sentiments before my own state representatives a couple of years ago, when he confronted his representatives on Tuesday concerning their contemplation of submitting an Article V application to the central government. In doing so, he called on them not to hide behind pieces of paper that would be trampled on like our Constitution has been, but rather stop taking federal money and start engaging in interposition against the beast. Trewhella, author of The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates, spoke at the Senate Committee on Financial Services, Constitution and Federalism's public hearing on...
  • North Dakota Becomes 10th State To Pass Convention of States!

    BREAKING NEWS! Today North Dakota became the tenth state to successfully adopt our Article V legislation! This is a historic victory for the grassroots warriors of COS North Dakota, our legislative champions, and the American people. North Dakota joins nine other states calling for an Article V Convention of States for the purpose of proposing constitutional reforms that limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and set term limits for federal officials, including Congress and the judiciary! Americans see a flailing federal government that is out of ideas. We are ready to break the shackles...
  • Article V Opponents and the Question of Sovereignty Part V

    03/17/2017 7:20:26 AM PDT · by Jacquerie
    Article V Blog ^ | March 17th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    In earlier posts we learned the legal and political sovereign over colonial America was the King-in-Parliament. After independence, both sovereignties relocated to the new state legislatures. From Part IV, the Constitution put the Declaration’s recognition of legal sovereignty in the people into practice. Peaceful Revolution. Man is incapable of creating a perfect institution, suitable for all times. Through Article V, the decay and eventual death that typifies republics was no longer inevitable. The Constitution never pretended to perfection or to the exclusion of future improvements. On the contrary, the healing principle in Article V enables the legal sovereign to return...
  • Are Term Limits a Good Idea or do They Restrain Our Rights?

    03/16/2017 1:52:37 PM PDT · by ReformedMedia · 52 replies
    The Washington Standard ^ | 03-16-2017 | Tim Brown
    Those who have advanced a Constitutional Convention in the terms of an Article V Convention, have often said that people were in agreement that there should be a constitutional amendment for congressmen and senators to only be able to serve so many terms.  However, that is very surface level, and I'm not just talking about the Article V convention which has a lot of pitfalls.  In a new video, Constitutional expert Robert Brown explains how term limits transfers the power of We the People to lobbyists and special interests. First, Brown points out that when states have attempted to set...
  • He Got a Bad Grade. So, He Got the Constitution Amended. Now He's Getting the Credit He Deserves.

    03/15/2017 7:28:05 PM PDT · by Mean Daddy · 41 replies
    KUT 90.5 ^ | MAR 13, 2017 | MATT LARGEY
    With everything that’s going on in politics these days, it helps to remember the power that we have as individuals to make change. Examples of this are far too few, of course. But there is one that stands out. And you’ve probably never heard it. The story begins in 1982. A 19-year-old sophomore named Gregory Watson was taking a government class at UT Austin. For the class, he had to write a paper about a governmental process. So he went to the library and started poring over books about the U.S. Constitution — one of his favorite topics. “I'll never...
  • Breaking – Arizona Legislature Passes Convention of States Resolution

    03/13/2017 4:06:29 PM PDT · by cotton1706 · 38 replies ^ | 3/13/17 | David Leeper
    After several years of trying, the Arizona State Legislature has just joined 8 other states in passing a Convention of States Resolution calling for a convention to propose amendments to the US Constitution. Today the AZ Senate joined the House in voting for this resolution. The called-for amendments proposals convention will be mujch more than an academic debate and an appeal as a supplicant to the US Congress. Article V (Part 2) of the US Constitution gives state legislatures the power to amend the US Constitution without the permission or approval of Congress, the President, or the Supreme Court. Yes,...
  • Article V and the Question of Sovereignty Part IV

    03/13/2017 3:56:13 AM PDT · by Jacquerie · 4 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | March 13th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    The Framing generation bequeathed a brilliant governing form to posterity. Perhaps its most notable feature is the separation of powers. Far less well-known, yet just as important, is what the Framers did with legal and political sovereignty. To review from previous posts: • The legal sovereign has unlimited, absolute, and supreme law-making power. The Constitution is the supreme law-making expression of the legal sovereign. • The political sovereign is the single person or body that writes statutes. As per Article I § 1, Congress is America’s political sovereign; it is responsible for crafting statutes necessary and proper to implement enumerated...
  • Vanity: What to do when your nation is drowning in debt and about to go under for good

    03/11/2017 1:06:10 PM PST · by Jim Robinson · 68 replies
    March 11, 2017 | Jim Robinson
    Our big spending national government—whether Republican, Democrat or whatever—ran up a national debt approaching ten trillion dollars during the 220 and some odd years prior to Obama taking office. During Obama’s 8 year term, our big spending government nearly doubled that debt. No one’s fault (cough, cough), but we and our posterity are now staring at an unbelievable, unmanageable, unsustainable, unpayable mountain of twenty trillion dollars in accumulated debt with no let up in sight! In fact they want to continue the wholesale printing and spending of money we don’t have and they’re planning on raising the debt ceiling to...
  • Article V and the Question of Sovereignty Part III

    03/09/2017 3:00:11 AM PST · by Jacquerie
    Article V Blog ^ | March 9th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: Sovereignty on the Move. Sovereignty is absolute. Notwithstanding the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God, a person or body is the legal sovereign when he or it has unlimited law-making power, when there is no person or body superior to him or it. During America’s colonial period, a single body, the King-in-Parliament (or equivalently, Parliament) was the legal sovereign. As legal sovereign, and being unencumbered by a written constitution, nothing limits the earthly, supreme lawmaking power of Parliament. Parliament can amend its unwritten constitution as it sees fit, and no Parliament is bound by a previous Parliament. By the...
  • Article V and the Question of Sovereignty Part II

    03/06/2017 1:59:32 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 1 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | March 6th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    The Declaration of Independence did not answer the question of American sovereignty very well. Despite the recognized right of the people to alter or abolish their form of government, the question of sovereignty continued to be an important theoretical question of politics throughout the following decade. Some held that legal and political sovereignty devolved to Congress. Others believed it belonged to the mass of the people. Unlike today, the concept of special conventions of the people as legal sovereign hardly existed in the early 1770s. Instead, the various congresses, and conventions of representatives from the colonies, or any other gatherings...
  • Article V to Avoid a General Convention, or Worse

    03/01/2017 1:05:03 PM PST · by Jacquerie · 28 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | March 1st 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    From a study of the debates at the 1787 Federal Convention and contemporary discussion in the States, our Framers anticipated Article V would be employed far more often than has proved to be the case. A fundamental part of our Constitution is the provision for future changes. Since all earthly creations suffer from decay and corruption, our Constitution is likewise in need of maintenance and repair. Defects accumulate in our governing form. Unless corrected and reversed in the reserved setting of a convention of states, errors and contradictions will accelerate until a divided society erupts in revolution. We must accept...
  • Texas Senate supports call for a Convention of States

    03/01/2017 5:26:08 AM PST · by Racehorse
    Austin American-Statesman ^ | 28 February 2017 | Jonathan Tilove
    The Texas Senate, by a 20-11 vote, agreed Tuesday to a call for a Convention of States to consider amendments to the U.S. Constitution to rein in federal power and set federal term limits. The Senate also agreed to impose a state jail penalty on a legislator who violates his or her oath as a delegate to a potential national Convention of States, a measure intended to allay concerns about a runaway convention that might seek to amend the Constitution in ways not intended by the Legislature. Under Article V of the Constitution, two-thirds of the states can call for...
  • Convention of states effort clears Texas Senate

    02/28/2017 4:09:36 PM PST · by cotton1706 · 17 replies ^ | 2/28/17 | John C. Moritz
    AUSTIN – Texas moved a big step closer on Wednesday toward asking Congress to call a “convention of states” aimed at rolling back the reach of the federal government and perhaps even overhauling the U.S. Constitution. “The federal government has treated the states as nothing more than a subcontractor to implement federal will,” said state Sen. Brian Birdwell, a Granbury Republican who shepherded two pieces of legislation necessary for Texas’ participation in a convention.
  • How Tennessee Could Be About To Start A Constitutional Crisis (Article V)

    02/22/2017 10:54:09 PM PST · by Perseverando · 86 replies
    Zero Hedge ^ | February 22, 2017 | Tyler Durden
    The State Senate of Tennessee has laid the legislative groundwork for something that hasn't been done in the United States of America since the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia. With a vote of 27-3, the Tennessee Senate has voted to call a "convention of the states" in order to draft and pass an amendment to the Constitution that would require balanced budgets to be passed every year. For those who are little fuzzy on their high school U.S. history knowledge, the Tennessean explains that the U.S. Constitution can be amended in two ways. The first would require a two-thirds...
  • Governor Greg Abbott Unveils Texas Plan

    02/20/2017 12:16:17 PM PST · by Jacquerie · 10 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | February 20th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Early last month, Texas Governor Greg Abbott delivered the keynote address to the Texas Public Policy Foundation. My heart skipped a beat when I read the title to his press release, Governor Abbott Unveils Texas Plan, Offers Constitutional Amendments to Restore the Rule of Law. Take a moment to click the link and scan the highlights. Now, when the governor of the second largest state in the Union, “gets it,” all of us in the COS movement should applaud. Few can match the combined political and professional resume’ of Greg Abbot. He was a Texas trial judge, an adjunct professor...
  • Convention of states resolution is on its way to full Texas Senate

    02/16/2017 4:35:33 PM PST · by ameribbean expat · 72 replies
    One of Gov. Greg Abbott’s emergency items moved one step further Thursday when a Senate committee recommended a resolution that would back a convention of states. The Senate State Affairs Committee approved Senate Joint Resolution 2, by state Sen. Brian Birdwell, R-Granbury, which calls for a national convention that would allow states to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution — an action that could only happen with a two-thirds majority, or 34 states, signing onto the idea.
  • Banned by The New American

    02/10/2017 8:35:30 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 18 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | February 10th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    The John Birch Society (JBS) can thank itself for this post. A few days ago, the JBS unintentionally put a smile on my face when I attempted to comment on a column at their website. See the saved screenshot below. In response to a piece at The New American (TNA), Wyoming and Arkansas Reject Call for Convention of States Con-Con, I was prevented from posting to the comment section. Since it never went to moderation, the content of my comment was irrelevant. I wondered, how many other COS supporters are banned as well? Hmmm, maybe Mark Meckler, Michael Farris, and...
  • Some Notes on the State of Virginia

    02/07/2017 10:12:58 AM PST · by Jacquerie
    Article V Blog ^ | February 7th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    There’s a tendency among 21st century patriots to assume the foundation of republican free government, conventions of the sovereign people, was known from the moment of independence in 1776. While the essential purpose (security of rights) of any government, expressed so eloquently by Thomas Jefferson, was widely accepted, the actual process to arrive at such government remained elusive. How were thirteen distinct societies to go about replacing their previous monarchal régimes? Let’s look at one, Virginia. Virginia’s Royal Governor, Lord Dunmore, dissolved the House of Burgesses when it passed a resolution on June 1st 1774 declaring a day of fasting...
  • Utah House calls for constitutional convention to rein in federal government

    02/06/2017 1:23:41 PM PST · by cotton1706 · 73 replies ^ | 2/3/17 | Lee Davidson
    The Utah House called Friday for a convention of the states to consider new amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which supporters said is the only way to rein in an out-of-control federal government. It passed HJR3 on a 45-29 vote, and sent it to the Senate for consideration. The resolution calls for a convention that would consider amendments to "impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress." "We are in jeopardy of losing our republic," said HJR3's sponsor,...
  • Just a Little Tyranny

    02/03/2017 12:06:06 PM PST · by Jacquerie · 4 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | February 3rd 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    By an eyelash, portions of my community avoided a ban on housecats. I am not kidding. Last Saturday, my wife and I attended a meeting of county commissioners, civic groups, and the public. Its purpose was to explain an upcoming US Fish & Wildlife (USFW) approved regulation regarding protection of . . . a mouse. That’s right, the St. Andrews Beach Mouse. Government biologists couldn’t find one in rural Gulf County Florida, but our sand dunes and climate are perfect, they say, for the little critters. Habitat protection for a never-seen rodent will cost the average homebuilder at least several...
  • This is an American

    02/01/2017 11:51:25 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 5 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | February 1st 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Amidst the manufactured angst over President Trump’s enforcement of immigration law, I recalled a few passages from Locke in America, by Jerome Huyler. As opposed to today’s social justice nonsense, which demands the acceptance of any and all foreigners, including barbarians intent on our destruction, immigrants to our shores in the latter-18th century had different aspirations. From Huyler: No sooner does a European arrive, no matter of what condition, than his eyes are opened upon the fair prospects . . . Has he any particular talent or industry? He exerts it in order to procure a livelihood, and it succeeds....
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part VII

    01/30/2017 2:03:12 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 1 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 30th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: The Federalist No. 40 Recall from the Introduction to this series, Brent Dunklau, COS District Captain (HD 33 Texas), noted James Madison' seemingly contradictory stances in The Federalist No. 40. Is the Constitution an amended version of the Articles of Confederation (AC) or is it an unauthorized and radical departure? Brent regularly encounters this question, and it is one which Article V opponents use to delegitimize the Constitution. James Madison opened No. 40 with a quick reference to No. 39, in which he distinguishes between national and federal systems. A national system is democratic. A majority of the people...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part VI

    01/26/2017 1:39:30 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 3 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 26th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: Passing the Torch. Remarkably, despite the enormous pressure to disclose the goings on of the federal convention, its delegates managed to keep very close to their oaths of secrecy. In a cost-saving move, several states simply recommissioned their congressional delegates to attend the convention. With so many in Philadelphia, congress, which was in New York, rarely had a quorum to conduct business during the summer of 1787. Edward Carrington of Virginia feared too few of his fellow delegates would return to New York and there wouldn’t be a congress to receive the report of the convention! The president of...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part V

    01/23/2017 1:53:31 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 12 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 23rd 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: The New Jersey Plan.In this post, we’ll see why continuance under the Articles of Confederation (AC) was certain to destroy the Union. The commissions for delegates to the convention were, at most, slight variations of the wording of the report from the 1786 Annapolis convention, “to devise such further provisions as shall appear to them necessary to render the constitution of the Federal Government adequate to the exigencies of the Union.” It is on this clause that Article V opponents hang their collective hats. To them, entire state delegations intentionally disregarded their instructions to strictly stand by improvements to...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part III

    01/16/2017 1:42:49 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 2 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 16th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    As Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, George Washington knew like no other man of the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation (AC). From the despair at Valley Forge in 1777-78, and a congressional recommendation that he plunder the Pennsylvania countryside for supplies, George Washington and his men felt the full measure of inadequate government. On March 15th 1783, Washington prevented a mutiny of his army encamped at Newburgh NY that would have changed the course of American history. The Revolutionary War did not end with victory at Yorktown; British troops still held New York, Charleston, Savannah, and western outposts. Ironically,...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part II

    01/12/2017 1:41:25 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 14 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 12th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Without a formal league until just a few months before the climactic battle of Yorktown in October 1781, the fledgling independent republics of the Revolutionary War somehow managed to frustrate the most powerful nation on earth. On March 1st, Maryland, under threat of invasion by General Cornwallis, joined twelve other states in confederation. As Maryland illustrated, the first purpose of the confederation was common defense from the English Army and Royal Navy. The Articles of Confederation (AC) formalized the powers of a pre-existing congress of the states. With one vote each, Rhode Island had as much influence as Virginia. Congress...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part I.

    01/10/2017 2:02:28 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 11 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 10th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: The Question of Sovereignty. Didn’t the Framers violate the Articles of Confederation (AC) when they drafted the Constitution? Weren’t the AC the supreme law of the land? This is the view of many Article V opponents. From Article VI of the confederation, “No two or more States shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them, without the consent of the united States in congress assembled . . . “ Furthermore, from Article XIII, “Every State shall abide by the determination of the united States in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Introduction

    01/06/2017 2:15:00 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 4 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 6th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    “Why just do what you can overdo?” is an insider joke in my family when one of us unnecessarily complicates an otherwise simple task. Over the next few posts, I’ll look at the Articles of Confederation. Brent Dunklau, Convention of States District Captain, (HD 33 Texas) provided the spark for this series. Like many in the COS movement, he has encountered pushback from Article V opponents who fear an Article V convention will replace the Constitution, just as the events of 1787-1788 replaced the Articles of Confederation (AC) with the Constitution. To opponents, these events were like a hostile takeover,...
  • Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part IV

    01/18/2017 2:06:05 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 3 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 18th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: The Road to Philadelphia. Most narratives on the events leading to the federal convention in Philadelphia begin with the Mount Vernon meeting of 1785, in which delegates from Virginia and Maryland discussed various issues involving commerce along their common border, the Potomac River. Other narratives, like those from Article V opponents, start with the congressional call to convention in February 1787. Both neglect earlier attempts to correct the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation (AC). In previous posts to this series, we learned that congressionally proposed amendments to the still-to-be-ratified AC regarding nationwide taxation and regulation of commerce went...
  • The Problem with Representation

    01/03/2017 2:14:36 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 6 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | January 3rd 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth
    As opposed to corruption of the US Senate, I’ve paid little attention over the course of this blog to the House of Representatives. The House isn’t involved with high profile treaties or appointments, and is far too infrequently involved with impeachments. Aside from hoping it doesn’t fall into democratic hands, it’s just sort of “there.” We dutifully vote every two years for the congressman of our choice, and that seems to be that. While few today give much thought to the topic of representation, it was high on the list of concerns during the Framing era. At the federal convention,...
  • Trump, The Election, And COS (Vanity)

    01/02/2017 11:05:07 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 26 replies
    January 2nd, 2017 | W. Scott Hightower
    A Letter from a Convention of States Volunteer. The election has brought lots of thought and opinions to me. Even the need to exhale after holding my breath for a long time. The need to see and have a change in my country has overtaken me in the last year. The thought as to what kind of country I would pass along to my grandchildren has been at the foremost part of my mind for a long time. Trump’s election to the presidency put a lot of Americans at ease, even the feeling of relief and there seem to me...
  • States: Tribunes of the People

    12/30/2016 2:09:06 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 13 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 30th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Along the way of researching my last two posts, I ran across The Two Great Republics: Rome and the United States (1913), by Illinois Senator James Hamilton Lewis. I was hesitant to open this online book because from his Wiki bio, Lewis supported both Woodrow Wilson and The New Deal. Bleh. But, I gave him a shot and I’m glad I did. While his conclusions squint Leftward, mine do not; his portrayal of Roman government and politics struck me as factual and neutral. His text found a home on my online reference bookshelf. The takeaway lesson is that republican societies...
  • Wanted: An Aristocratic Senate

    12/26/2016 2:10:30 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 23 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 26th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Despite our best efforts, we occasionally stumble along the way of life. On the discovery of our mistakes, we correct them, learn, move on, and hopefully avoid repetition. As our capacity to learn improves with age, we learn from the mistakes others as well. But, perhaps the wisest among us learn from the successes of others. To avoid as many of life’s natural pitfalls as possible, pay attention to the examples of the successful, good, and virtuous. That which applies to our personal lives extends to society and that expression of society, republican government. Few republican governments of any extended...
  • John Adams on Aristocracy, Democracy, and Tyranny

    12/21/2016 1:53:34 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 24 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 21st 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    My previous posts regarding repeal of the horrid 17th Amendment were built on a simple republican foundation; members of republics are represented in the lawmaking body. The Constitution acts on the people and states, and both had their place in congress until 1913. In its wake, the 17th Amendment left behind a federal Constitution without a federal government. Here, I take a different tack as to why the 17A must go. I will show from the standpoint of balancing society's natural proclivities, we must reestablish a federal senate of the states. Without a strong middle institution to repel democracy, the...
  • Publius Huldah vs Article V Part VII

    12/16/2016 1:55:48 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 1 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 16th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Restore the Republic. In conclusion, Publius Huldah repeated, “Our Constitution is a miracle; there is nothing wrong with it except for some amendments that Americans got conned into supporting.” Ignorance is our problem. It is our duty to know and enforce the Declaration and Constitution. View her speech here.Rodney Dodsworth Response. Every worldly creation endures wear and tear, and eventual breakdown if not purposely maintained. Government is no exception. All of them are subject to corruption by their administrators and neglect of their creators. Our Framing generation knew perfection was not a quality of our Constitution. As Thomas Jefferson wrote,...
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Part VI

    12/12/2016 1:37:22 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 7 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 12th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: Nullification. Publius Huldah. The Bill of Rights and Constitution are ignored. Our Framers advised two remedies to enforce the Constitution. First, James Madison said our constitution requires a virtuous people to select men of virtue and wisdom to office. The second remedy is “don’t go along with the lawlessness.” State legislatures must oppose violations of the Constitution instead of eagerly taking handouts to implement violations of our Constitution. (Timeline 36:00 – 43:00. View her speech here.) Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison wrote that each state has the natural right to nullify unconstitutional federal laws on their own....
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Part V

    12/09/2016 2:05:03 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 6 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 9th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Publius Huldah. Near 30:30 minutes into her speech, Ms. Huldah posits that James Madison opposed the state convention method in Article V. She cites The Federalist #49, and a private letter from Madison to a Virginia legislator named George Lee Turberville. Rodney Dodsworth Response. Considering that Madison made provision for amendments in his Virginia Plan of Government, and his notes of the federal convention do not reflect hostility to Article V, the bar must be set high for anyone to claim that Madison opposed a state convention to propose amendments. Ms. Huldah failed to clear the bar. Those who rely...
  • Law Professor: 17th Amendment 'Disenfranchised States'

    12/06/2016 2:31:55 PM PST · by george76 · 66 replies
    CNS News ^ | December 6, 2016 | Amy Furr
    The 17th Amendment, which allowed the popular election of U.S. senators, “disenfranchised” state legislatures and altered the U.S. Constitution's checks and balances, Chapman University Law Professor John Eastman told an audience of state legislators in Washington, D.C. last week. The amendment made it easier for Congress to pass legislation, which eventually led to the massive growth in federal power that the states are still grappling with today... “What the founders did is come up with this counterintuitive notion that adding an extra layer of government would provide less government and greater liberty. And it only worked if those governments were...
  • Disgruntled Democrats Want A Constitutional Convention To Leave The Union

    12/06/2016 12:54:31 PM PST · by Red Badger · 149 replies ^ | December 6, 2016 1:57 pm | Staff
    On Tuesday, disgruntled Democrats held a forum to discuss the possibility of replacing the Electoral College. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) conceded that Democrats could not get rid of the Electoral College due to the way the United States Constitution is written. “I don’t think we can sustain our American democracy by having the majority ruled by the minority. And so the question is how to fix this since the Constitution is written in such a way that it’s almost impossible to amend,” Lofgren said. Lofgren went on to say she is open to a Constitutional Convention, “We are three states...
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Part IV

    12/05/2016 2:21:39 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 27 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 5th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle: Conspiracy Everywhere. Publius Huldah, “If we have a convention now, George Washington, James Madison, Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton won ‘t be there to protect you.” (Timeline: 24:00-30:20. View her speech.)Rodney Dodsworth Response. These leading soldiers, patriots, statesmen and others of equal caliber led the Continental Army, and served in the Confederation Congress and state governments. Yet, such men, the best of their times, were unable to keep, as per Article II of the Articles of Confederation (AC), “security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare.” The failure of the AC to achieve its ends, despite the enormous...
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Part II

    11/28/2016 2:07:16 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 16 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 28th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Publius Huldah. Alexander Hamilton wrote, “The people are the natural guardians of the Constitution.” Hamilton expected us, the people, to differentiate between lawful exercise and illegal usurpation of power. If the power is on ‘the list,’ (Article I § 8) congress may do it, otherwise, congress may not. She hammers Scotus for corrupting the commerce, general welfare, and necessary and proper clauses, . . . but the nation doesn’t need an Article V convention. “Just look it up in the federalist papers for original intent,” she says.Rodney Dodsworth Response. Ms. Huldah is well-educated, which leaves me at a loss to...
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Part III

    12/02/2016 1:21:52 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 11 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | December 2nd 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Subtitle – Article V to Avoid a General Convention.Publius Huldah. Upon declaring Independence in July of 1776, the states operated under the Articles of Confederation (AC). (Timeline: 22:00 – 24:00. View her speech.) Delegates to the federal convention of 1787 disobeyed congress and their states when they went beyond their orders to draft revisions of the AC. Ms. Huldah cites Article XIII of the AC as governing authority. As demonstrated in Philadelphia, convention delegates then as now have inherent authority to do as they please. Therefore, it will be impossible to stop similar antics at a future convention of states.Rodney...
  • The Real Electoral College Reform

    11/29/2016 7:57:42 AM PST · by Kaslin · 65 replies
    American Thinker ^ | November 29, 2016 | Bruce Walker
    The familiar whining about the popular vote in presidential elections and the implicit anachronism of the Electoral College ought to be turned on its head by constitutional conservatives. The greatest problem of politics and government in our country today is Washington, and the only answer to that problem is the restoration of true federalism, making state governments a vital player in national elections. The Constitution conferred three special powers on state legislatures to make sure that the federal government was held in check: enacting constitutional amendments, choosing members of the Senate, and choosing the method of selecting presidential electors. Until...
  • The States' Trump Card against the Fed

    11/29/2016 3:26:53 AM PST · by expat_panama · 24 replies
    The American Thinker ^ | November 29, 2016 | Fritz Pettyjohn
    A fourth branch of government was created by Article V of the Constitution, superior to the other three. It consists of 7,382 voting members, distributed in the 50 States. In order to act, this fourth branch, which I call the Federal Assembly, must organize itself into a two-thirds supermajority of the States in order to make a proposal. Majorities in both houses of a state legislature in 34 states must agree on the subject matter... ...three-fourths supermajority of states is required to adopt it. It's hard, and it's never been done in the 229 years we've had the Constitution –...
  • Publius Huldah vs Article V Part I

    11/23/2016 1:50:46 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 11 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 23rd 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    From the Introduction, Publius Huldah gave a lecture on October 29th in which she outlined her opposition to an Article V Convention of the States to propose amendments to our beloved Constitution. The link will take you to a YouTube hosted by the aptly named Patriot Coalition Against All Enemies. Over a fifty-minute span, followed by a Q&A, Ms. Huldah explains why she regards COS and Article V supporters not as misinformed, but rather, as conspiratorial enemies. Publius Huldah. She opened her speech with “The con-con lobby wants to get rid of our Constitution and impose a new one.” She...
  • Publius Huldah vs. Article V: Introduction

    11/21/2016 2:15:53 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 50 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 21st 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    In an October 29th speech to a small gathering, Publius Huldah discussed her perceptions of the dangers posed by an Article V Convention of the States to propose Constitutional amendments. After viewing the entire talk, I understand why the leading figures of the Convention of States movement (COS) haven’t responded in depth to her various accusations. Her conclusions are often at the fringes of reason and she carries a deep and personal animosity to the leaders of the COS. Since the COS leadership choose not to address most of her accusations, please allow me, your humble blogger, to take up...
  • Scotus and Societal Corruption

    11/11/2016 1:54:23 AM PST · by Jacquerie · 4 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 11th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    A common concern among Article V opponents is that society is too corrupt to be trusted with amending the Constitution. Perhaps they are right. If so, how did this corruption come about? Is it as bad as many believe? I say the corruption of our culture did not grow upward from the people; corruption rained downward from elites. I place the blame for societal corruption largely on scotus. Scotus not only regularly ignores or violates the written supreme law of the land, it often does the same with Natural Law, the Law of Reason. Scotus has normalized its judicial reach...
  • Just Take It

    11/04/2016 2:14:51 AM PDT · by Jacquerie · 14 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 4th 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Non-Resistance and Passive Obedience. The people who spout ‘diversity is our strength’ have cast a mind-dulling net of intellectual conformity across our nation. Thought police don’t just troll the halls of academe; they have infiltrated society so deeply that violence from those offended by supposedly hurtful thoughts or words is sanctioned by the highest levels of government and popular institutions. Trump supporters can find themselves beaten up. Municipal police in San Jose CA just watched and stood idly by as Trump rally attendees were assaulted. Since Trump is obviously a racist, then so are his followers. Opposition to racism is...
  • The New Americana vs. James Madison

    11/02/2016 2:01:39 AM PDT · by Jacquerie · 8 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | November 2nd 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    Raise your hand if you knew that James Madison opposed the second method in Article V to amend the Constitution. The New Americana (TNA) recently published a misleading and insult-laden column regarding the Article V state convention amendment process and Convention of States (COS) supporters. It illustrates how the most effective deceptions are built around an element of truth. The TNA shamelessly attempts to deceive the reader into believing the very opposite of the truth, that the man who shepherded the Virginia Plan to fruition as a new Constitution of government opposed taking appropriate measures to keep it. As a...
  • Freedom to Think

    10/31/2016 2:06:09 AM PDT · by Jacquerie · 8 replies
    Article V Blog ^ | October 31st 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth
    While one can read recent works by respected academics such as Victor Davis Hanson, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams regarding modern Leftist speech codes, thought police, white privilege and other assorted and dangerous nonsense, I want to make the effort here, at the risk of using a Leftist term, to likewise show how truly regressive the modern Left is when it comes to simple reason and our freedom to think. Background. During England’s tumultuous 17th Century, the freedom to use one’s reason to sort out man’s relationship to God and country emerged in a whirlwind. This freedom collided with Stuart...