“markomalley posted the errors a few days after it first came out.”
Then the Vatican has corrected their mistranslation by now?
The only ‘proof of mistranslation’ I’ve seen was an article postulating a Spanish original, that then constructed the hypothetical Spanish by making a Spanish translation of the posted English version, which it then retranslated back into English.
They then argued the new English translation was better than the original English translation that their hypothetical Spanish version came from.
Do you see any flaws in that approach? I do!