Free Republic

“What, in your opinion, constitutes ‘doing enough’?”

You didn’t ask me, but IMO, doing enough would encompass the excommunication of everyone connected with the production, sale, purchase, and use of that Satanic dreck.

“We will tolerate them as long as they are kept on a very short leash.”

After a hundred million innocent dead in the twentieth century, no liberal is entitled to the slightest consideration, courtesy, or civility. Liberals should be reviled, abominated, spat upon, even beaten, whenever they have the gall to show their faces in the presence of decent people.

Diversity is where nations go to die.

“Rush wasn’t quoted exactly correctly.”

Gee, wotta surprise. Rush misquoted. Whooda thunkit?

Thanks for the clarification.

You know, every time somebody tells me that Limbaugh said this or that stupid or false thing, it turns out that he didn’t say it.

“Every poll from both Republicans and Democrats say this is a tight race. But forget that. This thing is going to be a Romney landslide” Rush Limbaugh, Nov.6, 2012.

I Googled that, and the only thing other than this thread that popped up was this: http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2012/11/rush_limbaugh_says_romney_will.php

Even that mouth-frothing, brain-dead putz did not cite the quotation you offer. That screed did have a link to Newsmax: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Limbaugh-polls-Romney-landslide/2012/11/05/id/462891

That article didn’t cite your quotation either.

To sum up, you say Limbaugh said it, but haven’t yet provided a source.

Let’s review the action.

I said, “I just did a quick web search for that prediction. Could you point me to your source?”

To which you replied, “Um, who are you and why don’t you go away? Troll alert!”

No comment on that exchange is required. I would only point out that I have been here since 1998.

“Rush told them that Bambi was going to lose in a “landslide”

I just did a quick web search for that prediction. Could you point me to your source?

“Drudge is where Rush goes to get much of his daily news, which shows the limits of his time and research abilities...or that of his staff.”

Have *you* ever been to Drudge? It’s a collection of links, and the people who compile them miss very few if any significant matters. It doesn’t pretend to be a complete news source; it is a jumping-off place—and a very good one.

“tiresome”

Then don’t listen. There’s always Jon Stewart.

“Unwavering conviction that Bambi was going to lose in a landslide last November.”

Maybe he did. After all, Soros counted the votes.

“Both did harm to conservative causes.”

Nonsense.

“Drudge which is not a good source.”

Wossamatta U? Drudge is not a source. It is a place where links to sources are found.

“As opposed to the “relevant” Anderson Pooper who called patriotic men, women, and children “teabaggers”

Why is he able to walk the streets in safety? Are there no men left in America?

“Making fun of peoples’ names and physical appearance is just...counterproductive for our side.”

Sorry, but I disagree. I have seen the lunatic fringe become the ruling class in my lifetime, and making fun of people has been one of their most effective weapons—scurrilous though it may be.

“But he is an entertainer and that gives him license.”

Yes, that’s true. That’s why I think the appropriate response when leftards call his remarks “infamous” is a facepalm and a broad, long-suffering “FU, you ignorant POS,” with strong emphasis on the first “you” and the last word of the sentence.

I have said much worse about that wanton harlot Fluke. But then, I’m not Limbaugh, so who cares?

What about the testicle gap?

Opinion 1: These abuses will continue until the people put a stop to it.

Opinion 2: The people are excluded from the political process.

Draw your own conclusion.

“he infamously called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute”

Did he really? Or is this just another distortion?

“co-leader of an emerging conservative political party”

Conservative? Oh, you vile media slimebuckets.

The WWII militarists called themselves Nazis, but those who follow in their footsteps are “conservatives?”

Jailed? The limeys used to hang slavers.

“gay marriage”

Eh?

Oh, you mean sodomite play-pretend marriage.

Bless their hearts.

Thank you very much for your kind words. I must confess, though, that the work was not done three days ago, but over more than three decades.

“Seriously?”

Of course not seriously.

“get a damn life.”

Get a sense of humor...and stop ignoring the arguments in the post.

“Am I to be fined for daring to disagree Jim R. ?”

No, but you should be for ignoring post 634.

“She has become too polarizing”

What is meant by “polarizing?” It means only that a person of principle inspires opposition to the leftist agenda. That’s all. It is a bad thing only from the perspective of the left, and no one should have the slightest concern for their perspective. When a RINO uses the term, it just means that he is in a snit because principled opposition is interfering with his attempts to give the leftists their way.

We should be working for *more* polarization, not less. We should be drawing a line in the sand: “Demonrats and other scum please move to the other side of that line.”

The demonrats well know that it is polarization that wins elections, which is why they both practice it and try to convince their enemies that it is a bad thing. When one accepts that premise, one allows the demonrats to select Stupid Party candidates by eliminating all that the rats find “too polarizing.”

“A leader knows how to bring people together.”

A leader also knows how to recognize the enemy. A leader knows that Evil always attacks Good, because that is the nature of Evil. A leader knows that one must not bring Evil into the tent, and that one cannot bring people together with Evil without becoming evil.

All leftist thought, from the limousine liberalism of a George Clooney to the murderous horrors of Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot, is of and from Satan. Leftism is a contaminant in the human cognosphere, not a natural component of it.

Satan is smarter than we are, and he never sleeps. Those over whom he has the most influence are like maniacally evil energizer demons.

It is important to remember that this is a different “left” and “right” than that in common use today. This distinction is not between monarchists and advocates of mob rule, nor even between idiots taken in by socialist drivel and those who know better. It is a distinction between “closer to God” and “closer to the Earl of Hell,” and is independent of the personal beliefs of anyone concerned. A Stupid Party imbecile could fancy himself an atheist and still be to the right of a demon-ridden Evil Party Messalina who claimed the label of Catholic without holding or supporting Catholic beliefs.

Each member of the Evil Party is a loathsome, crawling, traitorous, congenitally dishonest, amoral, sociopathic, gun-fearing, pansy-assed, chicken-choking, Starbucks-sipping, godless, America-hating, degenerate, pickle-smooching, liberal-Nazi fool. At the very best, through stupidity or moral confusion, they are allied with and support such scoundrels.

There can be—there must be—no “bringing together.” The alternatives are victory or death, as has always been the case.

“Sarah Palin divides.”

Such discernment is one trait of a good leader. A good leader makes one thing perfectly clear: he does not stand with or even tolerate scumbags. If that means that the scumbags don’t vote for him, well, they weren’t going to vote for him anyway, so nothing lost—but much gained.

If a candidate doesn’t drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown “Exorcist” seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.

It is the leftards and their loathsome catamites in the media, academia, the judiciary, and almost every other walk of life who “divide.” Agree with them or you are their enemy, and they will stop at nothing to destroy you. Governor Palin has made it plain that she does not agree with them, that she gladly accepts that she is their enemy, and so they howl that she divides rather than unites (disagrees with them), that she is a hater (disagrees with them), that she is a charismatic pole around which their opposition can gather (disagrees with them), and that for all these reasons she is “unelectable.”

Really? We’re going to let the leftards disqualify her as a candidate because she disagrees with them?

If we do, we deserve to ride the boxcars to the death camps. And don’t think that isn’t what they have in mind.

“Not That There’s Anything Wrong With That”

Yes, there is.

“America is “exceptional.” We are exceptional because of our culture.”

This country is exceptional in that it is the only nation founded specifically on the assertion that people have rights that precede any government or law. These rights are conferred by God, and, therefore, any infringement of these rights by any human agency must always be illegitimate.

“The date on this was 2012 — so was it April of 2012?”

I thought so, and searched on that, but didn’t find it.

“Because he wanted to be boss.”

Maybe it was because he thought it reasonable that he should be able to ask a stewardess for a drink, as people always have on planes, and he felt like resisting a change for the worse.

What’s the name of the encyclical published in April?

So, how do you get one, and how do you get it annointed?

I like to tell them that I find whatever leftard drivel they have babbled to be “very offensive.”

“There is a very real “War on Women” in the world. The question is, why do Lesley Stahl and women on the Left keep carrying water for the wrong side? Time to wake up.”

Because leftism and mohammedism are both of and from Satan.

“There is a very real “War on Women” in the world. The question is, why do Lesley Stahl and women on the Left keep carrying water for the wrong side? Time to wake up.”

Because leftism and mohammedism are both of and from Satan.

For more on Chechnyans, search “Beslan.”

We must bring this to a halt.

What have I done? Precious little.

What can I do? Seriously. With Barack Hussein Outhouse elected, and elected again, what can I do?

Homophobic?

Oh, they must be referring to the entirely normal aversion that normal people feel for sexual perversion.

“There is a gigantic, ambitious, self-willed monster at the heart of the enlightenment glorification of the self”

Yes, his name is Lucifer.

“It is only with the assistance of the Holy Spirit and with full respect for the tradition and teaching of the church that the Scriptures’ true meaning can be understood.”

People who deny this have never enjoyed the assistance of the Holy Spirit.

My regrets to those who fancy themselves capable of understanding scripture correctly all by themselves, but YOPIO just doesn’t get it.

“Diversity is a handicap to be dealt with, not a source of strength. “

Diversity is where nations go to die.

“Diversity is a handicap to be dealt with, not a source of strength. “

Diversity is where nations go to die.

“And this girl, too...”

Were her attackers of the melanin-enriched persuasion?

“I think they are looking to use any excuse to deprive people of the right to gun ownership.”

Yes, they don’t want a lot of trouble loading us on the boxcars.

“Nazism and Islam were more closely aligned than most people realize”

Yes, indeedy.

It failed because Keynesian economics is wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

“God help me, but there are times when I think, why couldn’t they have directed their fury towards the Muslims instead?”

If we take the Nazis, the Jews, and the Muslims, which two were (and are) animated by Satan?

Sorry for my faulty memory, but was Dr. Raoul involved in the “Blood Trail” thread?

“I occasionally spend a moment puzzling about why homosexual men are so into abortion.”

Baby-killing and sodomy are Satan’s sacraments.

“We thought that diversity was about being tolerant, multi-cultural. But it was an innocent mistake. Diversity meant to be diverse from morality in society. It simply is another name for evil.”

Diversity is where nations go to die.

“There are rumors. Disturbing rumors.”

She defected to North Korea?

“Why are folks just NOW discovering the contempt that Starbucks has for Americans who have regard for morality?”

Haven’t been in one since I discovered, some years ago, that they give money to baby-killers.

Thanks for the interesting information.

“I predict much teeth gnashing ahead.”

I think (dern it) that you are right.

“I was lucky to be allowed to drive away.”

Were you stopped by these vigilantes, or just thugs?