Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oxford Professor who Blasts America as Racist Responds to my Email
The Guardian - UK ^ | November 17, 2001 | Self

Posted on 11/17/2001 4:49:23 PM PST by BamaCharm

Last night, Pokey78 posted this article from The Guardian (UK). It is an OPED from an Oxford professor who blasts America for slavery and racism. It included his email address and, on a whim, I emailed him attaching an article from the NY Daily News that refuted his opinion.

His OPEDWhat Next? Alabama

Article I emailed to him Facing Facts About Africa and Slavery - NY Daily News

This is the email response I received from him today.

FROM: Jonathan David Farley
11/17/2001

I haven't bothered to display most of these images. Your story obviously has a right wing bias (meaning it contains concrete falsehoods)---the blacks who have been "exposing" so-called "race hustlers" can be counted on one hand or two, are invariably deranged (clear in the case of Clarence Thomas and his Coke bottle; Glenn Lowry used to be an abusive cokehead; etc.). In fact, the Black conservatives are usually pretty obvious opportunists and race hustlers---they invariably shoot to the top of the bestsellers lists, get invited on all the shows (like Republican NAACP leader Shannon Reeves on Politically Incorrect---you've never seen a Black Panther on that show, because their ideology really IS "politically incorrect").

Now to the charges. I imagine there is slavery in Africa today. There is also war, famine, AIDS. Of course, this didn't just happen all of a sudden. Just today a report came out (I only saw the headlines) that the King of Belgium knew of the plot to kill Lumumba. Of course, it came nowhere close to American slavery.

I thought some of you would appreciate my response back to him.

Sir, I am surprised by your response.

All I did was email you an article. Your retort was "Your story obviously has a right wing bias (meaning it contains concrete falsehoods)". Then, you launch into a personal assault against African-Americans with whom you disagree philosophically. I'm not attacking you but I need to ask...isn't it quite possible that you are the one with a bias?

Sir, you are an intelligent man. You are a professor. Is it NOT your calling to research, separate fact from fiction, and espouse the truth regardless of your predisposition? Since I took the time to read your recent article in The Guardian and have taken the time to write you, will you not give me the same courtesy?

The U.S. was a slave holding nation, true enough. However, America's slavery sins were not unique in the world and America accounted for less than 5% of the slaves sent to the western hemisphere. The U.S. has however, been the subject of the most criticism for slavery. Consider these facts.

Arabs were involved in the African slave trade long before Europeans

African Heritage Extends Across the Arab World and

The Role of Islam in African Slavery

Europeans began the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and were overwhelmingly responsible for perpetuating it into the western hemisphere.

The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and

Origins of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade

Britain, where you now reside, was the primary culprit. Remember America was a British colony up until 85 years prior to America's Emancipation Proclamation.

The overwhelming majority (95.4%) of African slaves introduced into the western hemisphere during the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, were transported to South America and the Caribbean. Brazil alone accounts for 35.4% of the African slaves introduced into the western hemisphere. The number of Africans transported as slaves to the British West Indies alone is 4 times the total introduced into the United States.

Slavery was NOT practiced in all of America. Americans fought a war with slavery as the dominant issue. Nevertheless, you seem to single out America alone as the scapegoat for African slavery while allowing the rest of the world, who is far more culpable, off the hook.

Reparations for Slavery?

I'm sure there are British students at Oxford who applaud your condemnation of America for its slavery past, totally ignorant that their country was the primary supplier of African slaves to their former colony and to a larger degree to their colonies in the Caribbean.

Sir, one more thing, slavery is alive and well. It is being practiced around the world but primarily in Africa and Asia.

Global Slavery Resource Center and

Anti-Slavery.org

Thank you for your response and I hope that you will consider mine.

Darrell Baker, USA



TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Fighting emotion with facts.
1 posted on 11/17/2001 4:49:23 PM PST by BamaCharm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
All I know about Oxford Clerks I read in Chaucer. Horny dudes; but not too intellectual.
2 posted on 11/17/2001 4:57:30 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Touche'. Nicely done.
3 posted on 11/17/2001 4:58:11 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
How dare you respond to his emotional and ignorant tirade with facts. Have you no shame?
4 posted on 11/17/2001 5:03:40 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Very thorough and thought provoking post. What a shame that this self-identified 'American of African descent' has a totally closed mind. He probably portrays himself as the voice of black America. As they say over there: "Pity, really."
5 posted on 11/17/2001 5:07:02 PM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Sir, you are an intelligent man. You are a professor.

Your response is slightly flawed. ;-)

6 posted on 11/17/2001 5:08:27 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Your story obviously has a right wing bias (meaning it contains concrete falsehoods)

Well . . . we know where his bias is from this statement, don't we--i.e., if you're a conservative, you must be a certified liar.

You did a great job with your response. And you have done a good service for the cause. Every time we call these pointy-headed leftists on the carpet, is one less time we don't let them get away with their outrageous commentary unchallenged.

7 posted on 11/17/2001 5:08:56 PM PST by calmseas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Wasting your breath.
8 posted on 11/17/2001 5:11:36 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Thats impressive. You nailed it.
I doubt he will answer you ..you have too many facts.
9 posted on 11/17/2001 5:13:32 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Your response is brilliant. His e-mail to you is evidence that he is a toad and a dishonorable toad at that.
10 posted on 11/17/2001 5:13:36 PM PST by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
^5's

Great job :)

11 posted on 11/17/2001 5:15:26 PM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
I have seen leftist blacks on PI many many times, at MSU, the wife of Eldridge Cleaver just got tons of press for appearingat a Black Power Rally ...this person sees what he wants to see. In Universities, they call thinking like his "critical thinking"...I'm NOT joking.
12 posted on 11/17/2001 5:18:51 PM PST by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
GREAT JOB BC..after I collect my thoughts here, I have a few comments to add.
13 posted on 11/17/2001 5:19:47 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Like you, I have found one sure way to get both intellectuals AND media people "snippy": challenge them on their statements. As you have found, they resort to name calling or ending of discussion, rather than discuss facts.

Some years ago, a member of the editorial staff of the Inquirer ran a hit piece on Jerry Falwell. I responded to him and asked him to support his arguments. All he did was refer me to People for the American Way (!!). Later I called this person, and started talking. Somehow the subject came to churches. When I asked him what church he attended, he all of a sudden stopped the conversation and hung up!!.

14 posted on 11/17/2001 5:20:39 PM PST by calvin sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
bravo!
15 posted on 11/17/2001 5:21:23 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Yes, but you had to resort to reason and logic. What a cop out. Reason! Logic! You wimp, you will not even fight fair. You need to get in touch with your feelings and stop this disgraceful habit of hiding behind reasonable, documented, well thought out arguments.
16 posted on 11/17/2001 5:21:50 PM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
I really, truly doubt he is an intelligent man. I read the article, and I saw no sign the author possesses brains, learning, or common sense (which is so rare, one wonders why it's called common).

The author, had he been born white, would never have become a professor (or much of anything else, I suspect). He's another Lionel Jeffries ...a person who was handed a professorship on the basis of race and nothing else, certainly not intelligence or achievement.

The author is also a loathsome POS. That comes through quite clearly in both his article and his e mail.

17 posted on 11/17/2001 5:23:02 PM PST by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
Farley probably hasn't heard of any black conservatives beyond the two he disparages. What's with the Coke bottle? Feminist Icon Anita Hill talked about a Coke can.

Before he starts citing Belgians as authorities, Farley should read Newt Gingrich's dissertation about Belgian educational policy in the Congo (geared strictly towards Belgium's interests, not to prepare the Congo for future independence). An earlier king of Belgium, Leopold II, was guilty of extreme exploitation of the natives of the Congo...former Confederate soldier Samuel L. Clemens (Mark Twain) was among those denouncing the atrocities.

18 posted on 11/17/2001 5:27:11 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaCharm
A thoughtful and courteous response. You are to be commended for your perseverance in the face of what appears to be, for all intents and purposes, a hopeless task.

Stay with it! And keep us abreast of further developments. I will be very surprised if your last response is answered...

19 posted on 11/17/2001 5:27:32 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson