Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of president's military order (re-post)
UPI ^ | Thursday, November 15, 2001

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:40 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Text of president's military order

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 (UPI) -- Text of President Bush's Nov. 13 military order:
MILITARY ORDER DETENTION, TREATMENT, AND TRIAL
OF CERTAIN NON-CITIZENS IN THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM

By the authority vested in me as President and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Authorization for Use of Military Force Joint Resolution (Public Law 107-40, 115 Stat. 224) and sections 821 and 836 of title 10, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Findings.
(a) International terrorists, including members of al Qaida, have carried out attacks on United States diplomatic and military personnel and facilities abroad and on citizens and property within the United States on a scale that has created a state of armed conflict that requires the use of the United States Armed Forces.
(b) In light of grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism, including the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, on the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense in the national capital region, on the World Trade Center in New York, and on civilian aircraft such as in Pennsylvania, I proclaimed a national emergency on September 14, 2001 (Proc. 7463, Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks).
(c) Individuals acting alone and in concert involved in international terrorism possess both the capability and the intention to undertake further terrorist attacks against the United States that, if not detected and prevented, will cause mass deaths, mass injuries, and massive destruction of property, and may place at risk the continuity of the operations of the United States Government.
(d) The ability of the United States to protect the United States and its citizens, and to help its allies and other cooperating nations protect their nations and their citizens, from such further terrorist attacks depends in significant part upon using the United States Armed Forces to identify terrorists and those who support them, to disrupt their activities, and to eliminate their ability to conduct or support such attacks.
(e) To protect the United States and its citizens, and for the effective conduct of military operations and prevention of terrorist attacks, it is necessary for individuals subject to this order pursuant to section 2 hereof to be detained, and, when tried, to be tried for violations of the laws of war and other applicable laws by military tribunals.
(f) Given the danger to the safety of the United States and the nature of international terrorism, and to the extent provided by and under this order, I find consistent with section 836 of title 10, United States Code, that it is not practicable to apply in military commissions under this order the principles of law and the rules of evidence generally recognized in the trial of criminal cases in the United States district courts.
(g) Having fully considered the magnitude of the potential deaths, injuries, and property destruction that would result from potential acts of terrorism against the United States, and the probability that such acts will occur, I have determined that an extraordinary emergency exists for national defense purposes, that this emergency constitutes an urgent and compelling govern-ment interest, and that issuance of this order is necessary to meet the emergency.
Sec. 2. Definition and Policy.
(a) The term “individual subject to this order” shall mean any individual who is not a United States citizen with respect to whom I determine from time to time in writing that:
(1) there is reason to believe that such individual, at the relevant times,
(i) is or was a member of the organization known as al Qaida;
(ii) has engaged in, aided or abetted, or conspired to commit, acts of international terrorism, or acts in preparation therefor, that have caused, threaten to cause, or have as their aim to cause, injury to or adverse effects on the United States, its citizens, national security, foreign policy, or economy; or
(iii) has knowingly harbored one or more individuals described in subparagraphs (i) or (ii) of subsection 2(a)(1) of this order; and
(2) it is in the interest of the United States that such individual be subject to this order.
(b) It is the policy of the United States that the Secretary of Defense shall take all necessary measures to ensure that any individual subject to this order is detained in accordance with section 3, and, if the individual is to be tried, that such individual is tried only in accordance with section 4.
(c) It is further the policy of the United States that any individual subject to this order who is not already under the control of the Secretary of Defense but who is under the control of any other officer or agent of the United States or any State shall, upon delivery of a copy of such written determination to such officer or agent, forthwith be placed under the control of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 3. Detention Authority of the Secretary of Defense.
Any individual subject to this order shall be—
(a) detained at an appropriate location designated by the Secretary of
Defense outside or within the United States;
(b) treated humanely, without any adverse distinction based on race, color, religion, gender, birth, wealth, or any similar criteria;
(c) afforded adequate food, drinking water, shelter, clothing, and medical treatment;
(d) allowed the free exercise of religion consistent with the requirements of such detention; and
(e) detained in accordance with such other conditions as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe.
Sec. 4. Authority of the Secretary of Defense Regarding Trials of Individuals Subject to this Order.
(a) Any individual subject to this order shall, when tried, be tried by military commission for any and all offenses triable by military commission that such individual is alleged to have committed, and may be punished in accordance with the penalties provided under applicable law, including life imprisonment or death.
(b) As a military function and in light of the findings in section 1, including subsection (f) thereof, the Secretary of Defense shall issue such orders and regulations, including orders for the appointment of one or more military commissions, as may be necessary to carry out subsection (a) of this section.
(c) Orders and regulations issued under subsection (b) of this section shall include, but not be limited to, rules for the conduct of the proceedings of military commissions, including pretrial, trial, and post-trial procedures, modes of proof, issuance of process, and qualifications of attorneys, which shall at a minimum provide for—
(1) military commissions to sit at any time and any place, consistent with such guidance regarding time and place as the Secretary of Defense may provide;
(2) a full and fair trial, with the military commission sitting as the triers of both fact and law;
(3) admission of such evidence as would, in the opinion of the presiding officer of the military commission (or instead, if any other member of the commission so requests at the time the presiding officer renders that opinion, the opinion of the commission rendered at that time by a majority of the commission), have probative value to a reasonable person;
(4) in a manner consistent with the protection of information classified or classifiable under Executive Order 12958 of April 17, 1995, as amended, or any successor Executive Order, protected by statute or rule from unauthorized disclosure, or otherwise protected by law, (A) the handling of, admission into evidence of, and access to materials and information, and (B) the conduct, closure of, and access to proceedings;
(5) conduct of the prosecution by one or more attorneys designated by the Secretary of Defense and conduct of the defense by attorneys for the individual subject to this order;
(6) conviction only upon the concurrence of two-thirds of the members of the commission present at the time of the vote, a majority being present;
(7) sentencing only upon the concurrence of two-thirds of the members of the commission present at the time of the vote, a majority being present; and
(8) submission of the record of the trial, including any conviction or sentence, for review and final decision by me or by the Secretary of Defense if so designated by me for that purpose.
Sec. 5. Obligation of Other Agencies to Assist the Secretary of Defense.
Departments, agencies, entities, and officers of the United States shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, provide to the Secretary of Defense such assistance as he may request to implement this order.
Sec. 6. Additional Authorities of the Secretary of Defense.
(a) As a military function and in light of the findings in section 1, the
Secretary of Defense shall issue such orders and regulations as may be necessary to carry out any of the provisions of this order.
(b) The Secretary of Defense may perform any of his functions or duties, and may exercise any of the powers provided to him under this order (other than under section 4©(8) hereof) in accordance with section 113(d) of title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 7. Relationship to Other Law and Forums.
(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to—
(1) authorize the disclosure of state secrets to any person not otherwise authorized to have access to them;
(2) limit the authority of the President as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces or the power of the President to grant reprieves and pardons; or
(3) limit the lawful authority of the Secretary of Defense, any military commander, or any other officer or agent of the United States or of any State to detain or try any person who is not an individual subject to this order.
(b) With respect to any individual subject to this order—
(1) military tribunals shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to offenses by the individual; and
(2) the individual shall not be privileged to seek any remedy or maintain any proceeding, directly or indirectly, or to have any such remedy or proceeding sought on the individual's behalf, in (i) any court of the United States, or any State thereof, (ii) any court of any foreign nation, or (iii) any international tribunal.
(c) This order is not intended to and does not create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity by any party, against the United States, its departments, agencies, or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
(d) For purposes of this order, the term “State” includes any State, district, territory, or possession of the United States.
(e) I reserve the authority to direct the Secretary of Defense, at any time hereafter, to transfer to a governmental authority control of any individual subject to this order. Nothing in this order shall be construed to limit the authority of any such governmental authority to prosecute any individual for whom control is transferred.
Sec. 8. Publication.
This order shall be published in the Federal Register.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
November 13, 2001.




--
Copyright 2001 by United Press International.
All rights reserved.
--


Message: WWN-UPI-1-20011113-20503100-bc-us-bush-militaryorder-text-Text
Content: SRV_INTNEWS SRV_USNEWS SRV_UPIWASH
Content: LEGAL POL
Content: 02002000 02006000 02007000 02008000 11001000 11006000 11007000



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Quote of the Day by Faraday
1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Havisham
Ping...
2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Havisham
Per your request.
3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; dennisw; FITZ; harpseal; Squantos; Lent; rebdov; Manny Festo; maica; Freee-dame
bttt
4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:41 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Private trials are ok by me for these guys.

I'm interested in seeing; 1. Arrests and 2. Executions.

5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Private trials are ok by me for these guys

Hear, hear. No O.J. trials for these rat bastards.

6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; CheneyChick; vikingchick; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; Victoria Delsoul...
The bad news...

Section 1. Findings.
(g) Having fully considered the magnitude of the potential deaths, injuries, and property destruction that would result from potential acts of terrorism against the United States, and the probability that such acts will occur, I have determined that an extraordinary emergency exists for national defense purposes, that this emergency constitutes an urgent and compelling govern-ment interest, and that issuance of this order is necessary to meet the emergency.

The good news...

Sec. 2. Definition and Policy.
(a) The term “individual subject to this order” shall mean any individual who is not a United States citizen with respect to whom I determine from time to time in writing that...


7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
What are the latest totals on arab moslem "students" who have suddenly departed the mean old USA, unable to stand the scorn....or who have an even better reason for leaving?
8 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Hear, hear. No O.J. trials for these rat bastards."

Amen to that John!
9 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: amom; Alamo-Girl; Yellow Rose of Texas
FYI
10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:43 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
is the founder of the ACLU dead?
i hope so, and that he's spinning in his grave!
anybody know the commie/moron's name?

'RULE # .303'!!!

11 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:44 PM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
"is the founder of the ACLU dead? i hope so, and that he's spinning in his grave! anybody know the commie/moron's name?"

I think his name was John Howard.

The United Way used to conceal its contributions to the ACLU by listing it as the John Howard Foundation in its list of donees.

12 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:47 PM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the flag!

I don't understand the concern by some of the lawyers and judges since this applies only to non-US citizens!

13 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:47 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't understand the concern by some of the lawyers and judges since this applies only to non-US citizens!

It concerns me, even though I support it in principle, because there has been no formal declaration of war.


14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:54 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Not necessarily in that order!
15 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:54 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; JohnHuang2
Thanks for the ping and the post!
16 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:55 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't understand the concern by some of the lawyers and judges since this applies only to non-US citizens!

The SCOTUS has ruled that even non-citizens have due process rights because the 5th amendment applies to "persons" and not "citizens".

17 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:55 PM PST by ICU812
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ICU812
The SCOTUS has ruled that even non-citizens have due process rights because the 5th amendment applies to "persons" and not "citizens."

But I thought the Constitution was a "living" document. Who cares what it said 200 years ago?

18 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:55 PM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ICU812
The SCOTUS has ruled that even non-citizens have due process rights because the 5th amendment applies to "persons" and not "citizens".

Not when subject to military justice by being combatants in a "network" that has declared Jihad/War on us. If a non-citizen, robs a bank he has protection under our constitution, if a Non-citizen acts in the capacity of a combatant at war with this country he is subject to military justice.

19 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:56 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ICU812
I wonder, since all ammendments refer to the people as a whole... if the right to keep and bear arms extends to all persons... and if noncitizens can then be considered part of the militia?

Would the same people claiming non-citizens are protected under the fifth agree that they are protected under the second as well?

By what logic would the second ammendment refer to noncitizens- since it provides for a militia which can be called up for common defense and for domestic insurrections? How would our founders justify calling up noncitizens to fight? Would that not be akin to the old impressment of sailors on the high seas, which the US so vociferously opposed? And if the second truly does refer only to citizens, why would the same not be true of the other ammendments?

20 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:57 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson