Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Quintessence of the Middle East Conflict – Who Owns Jerusalem's Holy Sites?
Neue Zürcher Zeitung ^ | November 12, 2001 (in English) | Victor Kocher

Posted on 11/13/2001 10:22:48 AM PST by CommiesOut

The Quintessence of the Middle East Conflict

Who Owns Jerusalem's Holy Sites?

Victor Kocher

The unsuccessful search for a peaceful settlement has spotlighted irreconcilable claims by Israel and the Palestinians, that is, Jews and Muslims, to the holy sites on al-Aqsa/Moriah (the Temple Mount). Faced with Israel's forcible expansion, the Palestinians are refusing any compromise on the issue.

"The Haram ash-Sharif is the core of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." This laconic observation in a Hamas document on the importance of the mosques on the al-Aqsa plateau and the suspected ruins of Jewish temples in the ground beneath the sacred Muslim precinct must serve as a guideline for future efforts to achieve a political settlement for East Jerusalem. It explains the essence of conflicting Israeli and Palestinian claims to sovereignty over and access to the holy sites. Seen in this light, a profound point of weakness is revealed in the otherwise highly successful creation of a modern Jewish state: by political and military means, Israel has succeeded in bringing a large part of the Holy Land under its control, but not the historic Temple in Jerusalem. That is why it seems persuasive that, during the negotiations at Camp David and Taba, former Prime Minister Barak tried to achieve a final settlement which would include some manner of Jewish shrine on what Jews call the Temple Mount. In his mediation proposals prior to the Taba meeting, President Clinton offered the Israelis the temple's "Holy of Holies" – that is, an as yet undefined piece of the Mount – and assigned the remainder to the Palestinians.

Restricted Access

The Temple in Jerusalem constitutes the spiritual center of Judaism, and its restoration is one of the Talmud's precepts. To Muslims, on the basis of the Koran's Sura 17.1, the al-Aqsa Mosque is the spot from which Muhammad began his night journey up to heaven, and prior to the shift to Mecca it was the first qiblah, or mandatory direction for Muslim prayer. Since its military occupation of East Jerusalem in 1967, in the Aqsa precinct Israel has respected the Jordanian rules which were in force before.

The administration and prayer services throughout the 14-hectare plateau are under the jurisdiction of the Awqaf authorities, which administer Muslim religious institutions (awqaf, which is the plural form of the more familiar term waqf). The Awqaf in turn are under Jordanian sovereignty, although in 1988 Jordan relinquished all other administrative relations with the West Bank territories it had lost to Israel in 1967. The Awqaf have their own security forces, which supervise prayers and tourist visits on the plateau; Israel, which has annexed East Jerusalem, reserves to itself the right to maintain armed security and has used that right to bloody effect on a number of occasions when Arab demonstrations have gotten out of hand. Though it is not always exercised directly at the gateways to the Aqsa precinct, the Israeli army indirectly controls access to the holy sites through its road blocks between the city boundaries and the rest of the West Bank.

In the wake of the blockades and security precautions which have been imposed by Israel since the outbreak of the second Intifada, access to the Haram ash-Sharif is frequently blocked to non-Jerusalemites. And the Awqaf have banned all tourist circuits of the Aqsa precinct since the fateful visit there of Ariel Sharon in September 2000. This means that Jews, too, are now blocked from visiting their Temple Mount. Organized Jewish prayers in the Aqsa precinct have never been permitted by the Awqaf. The Israeli government has respected that ban, basing its stance on the rabbinic injunction that Jews should not step upon the precinct's grounds before the precise location of the ancient Holy of Holies has been determined, in order not to inadvertently defile it.

On the other hand, immediately after its 1967 victory Israel made the Western (or Wailing) Wall accessible to Jews. To do so, the authorities demolished part of the Old City's Maghariba Quarter in order to create access from the south and a huge plaza in front of the Wall. The al-Aqsa Mosque is situated on the plateau or terrace above the Wall. Archeologists have so far been unable to find any definitive remnants of Solomon's Temple (also known as the First Temple), which many Jews suspect was also located on this site, and some prominent researchers now maintain that no such finds are to be expected in future. In Jerusalem's Israel Museum, an inscription declares that similarly, nothing remains of the Second (Herodian) Temple since its destruction by the Romans, except for the (western) supporting wall of the Temple Mount. Opposite the Western Wall, near the Porat Yosef Synagogue, stand models of the Israelite temples, at which Orthodox Jews come to pray. In the Israel Museum, too, there is a sketch of the destroyed Temple showing two large structures where today the al-Aqsa Mosque and the Mosque of Omar (or Dome of the Rock) are situated, the latter containing the stone on which, according to scriptures, Abraham was prepared to sacrifice his son Isaac.

Fears of an Organized Disaster

In the view of the Muslim clergy, the Aqsa plateau constitutes a religious precinct no part of which may be sold, leased, deeded away or in any way alienated from its present status. The Koran mentions a special blessing of God "all around al-Aqsa," and according to a saying of the Prophet, one prayer said in al-Aqsa counts for 5,000 prayers elsewhere. The chairman of the Palestine National Authority, Arafat, uses political arguments to buttress the same position, and he is regularly deputed by the heads of the Arab League and the Islamic Conference Organization to defend the Aqsa precinct against alleged attempts at Judaization. Says one archeological official of the Awqaf: "We do not doubt an earlier Jewish presence. But now there are no synagogues in the Aqsa, only mosques. And it was not we, the Muslims, who destroyed the last Jewish temple." That destruction, in the year 70, was the handiwork of troops of the Roman Emperor Titus. During the Byzantine era, Jews were not permitted any closer to the Temple Mount than nearby Mount Herzl, from which they had to view the ruins of their holy site, which had been deliberately left standing.

In view of the Muslim holy sites now there, the Awqaf administration insists that public prayers in the Aqsa precinct must be in accordance with Muslim rites or else consist only of silent prayer. It points out that it would hardly be conceivable to permit heathen rites to be held in Christian churches again, just because those houses of worship are in many cases built on the foundations of ancient Roman temples. During the Camp David negotiations, one Israeli delegate posed the question: If an earthquake were to destroy the al-Aqsa Mosque, could only Muslim houses of worship be built on the site? Islamic propaganda insists that Jewish extremists could synthetically cause such a catastrophe in order to make room for construction of a Third Temple. In 1967 there was an arson attack against al-Aqsa, and four attempted bombings there were frustrated between 1980 and 1985.

A Final Settlement with Room for Jews?

Why shouldn't Jews be permitted to pray at their most sacred site in Jerusalem? As it has done in the past, so too in the modern conflict situation, this claim comes up against Islam's arrogant certainty that it has brought divine revelation to its ultimate completion and thereby fulfilled the promise of monotheism. But during their mediation efforts at Camp David, the Americans apparently considered Jewish claims to the Temple Mount as among those things which must be permitted as part of a final guarantee for the security of the modern Jewish state.

Various media carried reports of those closed-door negotiations based on statements by American officials and representatives of both parties to the conflict. According to an article in France's Le Monde dated December 29, 2000, and an article by a Palestinian author in Internationale Politik of August 2000, Israeli negotiators demanded the right to build a synagogue on the Temple Mount. An Israeli journalist writing in the New York Review of Books on October 18, 2001, reported that Barak had demanded space for Jewish prayers on the Haram ash-Sharif, and the Israeli daily Haaretz reported on September 18 and December 14 of last year that Barak at Camp David had called for a "Jewish religious presence," by which the journalist understood him to mean a synagogue. On another occasion, according to Haaretz, Barak actually promised Rabbi Itzhak Levy of the National Religious Party that a synagogue would be built on the Temple Mount. As a compromise – though itself somewhat explosive – President Clinton put forward for the Taba talks the idea of the Aqsa precinct under Palestinian sovereignty, but ceding the Holy of Holies located there to Israel.

Shared Holy Site in Hebron

Today, an official spokesman for Arafat claims to know nothing about a demand for a synagogue, and the Awqaf denies ever having been confronted with such an idea. In August of last year, Israel's chief rabbinate considered a project for a synagogue on the Temple Mount, but because of the issue's delicacy handed the matter to a committee for long-term study. A majority of rabbis continues to insist on the taboo against Jews walking in the precinct on the grounds of purity. Knowledgeable observers of the debate say that creation of a space for Jewish prayer would be possible on the lower level beneath the Aqsa plateau, possibly in the rock vaults known as Solomon's Stables in the southeastern corner, with access from outside the walls. These spaces were originally residential quarters during the Omayyad era and were later used as stables by the Crusaders. A Waqf expert points out that, because of increased numbers of visitors, Muslim prayer rooms have been created in those vaults in recent years and given the name the Marwan Mosque.

Why can't Muslims and Jews both pray to the same God on the Haram of al-Quds? Experience in the shared sanctuary at the Grave of the Patriarchs in Hebron does not allow for much optimism over the idea. No Jews had been permitted inside what came to be known as the Ibrahim Mosque since the days of the 13th-century Mameluk Sultan Baibar, who wanted to eradicate everything non-Muslim along with the last of the Crusaders. Jews were compelled to say their prayers on the seventh step of the outdoor staircase, at the level of Abraham's Grotto. It was only with the occupation of 1967 that the Israeli army restored Jewish access to this shrine, reserving part of the prayer hall for Jewish worshippers. The shrine became a symbol of the city, in which the presence of Jewish settlers was enforced by armed might, and in the 1997 Wye Agreement Hebron was divided into an autonomous Palestinian section and an Israeli-occupied sector. Today people heading for the Islamic part of the shrine must pass through metal detectors and careful identity checks. During my own visit just a short time ago, a troop of fully armed Israeli soldiers tramped through the space as we, in keeping with custom, walked barefoot toward the graves of the Patriarchs.

During a subsequent conversation, the superintendant of the mosque emphasized that no structural remains of a synagogue are to be found there. Then he showed us the bullet holes made by the weapon of settler activist Baruch Goldstein, who in 1994 massacred 30 defenseless Muslim worshippers as they were praying. The singsong of Jewish prayers penetrated the barrier separating the Muslim and Jewish sections. The shrine has a separate entrance for settlers from nearby Kiryat Arba who, unlike Palestinians, are permitted to park their cars directly below the staircase. The Muslim part of the shrine is generally empty; according to a local guide, Arab residents of Hebron now tend to do their praying at other mosques, because conditions here have become unpleasant. The Israeli security measures are also obstacles to important occasions, such as funerals.

These observations explain Palestinian rigidity with respect to Jerusalem's Haram ash-Sharif. The Awqaf and the Palestinian Authority are creating as many "facts on the ground" as possible in order to prevent a Jewish presence. Access for Jews seems unlikely just now, even behind thick walls or deep underground, because Israel's behavior to date has made the Palestinians suspect that it would only serve as a bridgehead for further expansion at Arab expense.

November 12, 2001 / First published in German, November 7, 2001



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 11/13/2001 10:22:48 AM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madrussian; malarski; Askel5; GROUCHOTWO; Zviadist; kristinn; Free the USA; struwwelpeter...
-
2 posted on 11/13/2001 10:23:18 AM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
The Dome of the Rock belongs to the Palestinians. The old Jewish Temple on which the Dome is built on belongs to the Jews.

So lets get a bloody huge crane and lift the dome off of the Jewish Temple and relocate it.

Makes ya wonder why the Palestinians built the Dome on top of the Jewish Temple.

3 posted on 11/13/2001 10:29:36 AM PST by klee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
It belongs to God of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob.

Mohammed is a liar, a false prophet, and a cult leader.

4 posted on 11/13/2001 10:38:57 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Moslem Arabs are constantly opressing and killing their christian minorities. Therefore, just like the Jews, these Christians deserve a refuge away from the constant harrasement. I suggest that, we can create a Palestenian state next to Israel. This state will ONLY allow Christian Palestenians, and Christian Arab refugees. The Moslem palestenians, including their chief terrorist Arafat, should go and live in Saudi Arabia or Egypt. Once the world is sold on this idea. Ethnic cleansing of Palestine from Moslems, and ethnically cleanse the Arab countries from the Christians! Then the hate may stop. Israel will live in peace, the christians will live in peace, even the Arab counties can choose to live in peace, or can go down with the Talibans!
5 posted on 11/13/2001 10:39:18 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klee
Moslems did that throughout history, they build mosques on top of churches all over the world. The temple mount gets a lot of press because it is a jewish thing. You never here any thing about Haj-Sophia, the biggest church ever in Istanboul?
6 posted on 11/13/2001 10:43:42 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
He who protects the Holy sites and the peaceful democratic worship and freedom of expression there, as well as the preservation of their history without revisionism, is who deserves to control the Holy sites. This issue is in effect much more important than the Palestinian state, because the Palestinian state should not be a priority overshadowing the all important freedom of worship and speech that has been denied by muslims to Jews and Christians there.

Palestinian Child intifada like Khmer Rouge are simply not a viable option. Let adults make treaties, not children. In addition Palestinians have proven time and again their historical revisionism, destruction of Jewish and Christian sites, forced conversions of Christians to the muslim religion and a host of other acts of agression against a state that you and I perfectly know was always open for peaceful and reasonable negociations under the guarrantee of security and self defense.

7 posted on 11/13/2001 10:49:35 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123; klee
You never here any thing about Haj-Sophia, the biggest church ever in Istanboul?

Let us not turn muslim oppression reality into a martyr score card between Jews and Christians. Like we hear about the gazillion synaguogues destroyed in Iraq, Iran, Medina and Mecca and what not.

Jews are not seeking to rebuild at Mecca and Medina like you seek to rebuild in Istanbul. They only want to preserve what little they have left. Get a grip.

8 posted on 11/13/2001 10:52:43 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
No, I have never heard of the Haj-Sophia...
9 posted on 11/13/2001 11:04:45 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
It is this giant magnificent church in Turkey. When The Moslems took over Costantinople, now it is Istanboul, they converted that church into a mosque. They grafitied Arabic words on the walls, took away the cross from the top of the church and put in a cresent....
10 posted on 11/13/2001 11:16:31 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
People may be surprised to know that the ownership title to the Temple Mount, to the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron, to the Garden of Gethsemane was held by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), and as head of that Church, the last owner was Tsar Nicholas II. Related to Queen Victoria, he was in his time the wealthiest and most powerful ruler in the world and was devoutly Christian and had inherited the Church of Constantine. His last words before his murder were "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do."

An interesting piece of history is that the ROC fled Russia and became known as the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR). Many relatives of the Tsar including Saint Elizabeth who was Queen Victoria's granddaughter, took refuge in the vast network of ROCOR churches, monasteries and convents around the world, form Palestine to France to Australia, every continent. Elizabeth became a nun, later canonized by the Church for her role in helping smuggle so many out of Russia during the murderous era of the Bolsheviks. She traveled throughout the ROCOR network and was later captured by the Bolsheviks who murdered her by throwing her down a mineshaft.

ROCOR installed their East Catholic Metropolitain (equivalent to Roman Catholic Pope) and the Synod in Manhattan near Central Park. There one finds a grand Orthodox Cathedral, There is also a magnificent ROCOR cathedral in San Francisco.

The Slavic people are very pious and desirous of recovering their past religion and culture. Unfortunately, the "Metropolitain" Aleksi in Moscow, a former KGB agent and scoundrel is not willing to give up his power to ROCOR which is the rightful line of descent in the ROC.

A few years ago, Aleksi cut a deal with Arafat and with the brutal force of Arafat's soldiers, seized the ROCOR Church by the Tomb of the Patriarchs, throwing the ROCOR nuns out.

Perhaps one of the most touching of the Tsar's family of Churches is found by the Garden of Gethsemane, the Church of Mary Magdalene, which houses a convent. The roof is in need if repair and they will gladly accept your donation of money or materials. These Church people are some of the most gentle and kind people you could ever meet.

11 posted on 11/13/2001 11:17:13 AM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
The Koran mentions a special blessing of God "all around al-Aqsa," and according to a saying of the Prophet, one prayer said in al-Aqsa counts for 5,000 prayers elsewhere.

This comic book religion gets curioser and curioser.

The Koran, in its entirety was revealed through the prophet Mohamed, right?

As a result of this revelation, Islam came into existence. Now I can't help wondering... is the al Aqsa mosque really described in the Koran? If so where?
Was this mosque, whatever it was originally called, actually built before Mohamed died?

And if it is so important, why was it falling apart when Mark Twain visited the area at the turn of the century?

12 posted on 11/13/2001 11:31:59 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klee
Makes ya wonder why the Palestinians built the Dome on top of the Jewish Temple.

It shouldn't.
That is standard Muslim SOP everywhere they have ever conquered and occupied, including Sofia in Constantinople.

13 posted on 11/13/2001 11:34:01 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Jerusalem is not mentioned even once in the Koran, and there is no evidence at all that Mohammed ever visited the place.

The myth of Mohammed departing the earth on his horse from the Temple Mount is just that, a myth, and it is a relatively modern one at that. I believe it was invented by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin Husseini, Yasser Arafat's uncle (Arafat was born with the last name of Husseini).

14 posted on 11/13/2001 11:48:26 AM PST by Magician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump
15 posted on 11/13/2001 11:51:57 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
And your facts to back this up are...?
16 posted on 11/13/2001 11:59:56 AM PST by Lejes Rimul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
So we should trust a German to explain the holy sites of Jews? Pardon me if I LOL....

This article is full of inflammatory speculation and conjecture, and no factual assertions whatsoever, that Israeli leaders have ever actually planned to build a Third Temple. IMO, this is another myth the Palestinians and their sympathizers in Europe have invented out of whole cloth to further inflame Muslims. Orthodox Jews hold the construction of the Third Temple as the final sign of the coming of the Messiah, and believe that only the Messiah can rebuild the Temple. It is ridiculous to think that any Israeli leader would ever suggest that a secular Israeli government would rebuild it. This would be an affront to the orthodox.

However, it is very useful for the Palestinians and their sympathizers, including clearly the author of this article, to trot out this myth as somehow "balancing out" the more unreasonable demands of the Palestinians. But it doesn't wash.

17 posted on 11/13/2001 12:10:26 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
I am disturbed by this author's question in an otherwise informative piece of work:

"Why can't Muslims and Jews both pray to the same God on the Haram of al-Quds?

They do not share the same God. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Yahweh, is a jealous God. He does not tolerate the worship of other gods before Him. Back to Genesis. Read the Book, all ye who have eyes to see and ears to listen. It tells where all this is going. There is one God and all men will have to choose and be accountable.

18 posted on 11/13/2001 12:11:53 PM PST by justabig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
It shouldn't.That is standard Muslim SOP everywhere they have ever conquered and occupied, including Sofia in Constantinople.

I think what I was trying to point out was that if this was a religion intent on peace they would not have done such a thing as build something of importance on such a valued site of another culture. If peace is their intent why would they do it?

19 posted on 11/13/2001 12:27:12 PM PST by klee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
I am aware that Muslims do that sort of thing everywhere they go. I dont think however, we hear so much about the Temple Mount simply because its a 'Jewish thing'. I think its because this is one of the very few sites that they have. Jews only have one homeland and a few sites. While Muslims have many homelands and many holy sites in comparison.
20 posted on 11/13/2001 12:33:14 PM PST by klee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson