There's no difference in one false teaching than the other.
Posted on 11/15/2019 6:36:46 PM PST by marshmallow
The Holy Spirit will deliver His Church from this evil heretic.
That wipes out a great deal of Roman Catholic theology.
Pope Stupid the First speaketh.
There's no difference in one false teaching than the other.
‘In the synod’s final document, bishops defined ecological sin as a sin against God and future generations that “manifests itself in acts and habits of pollution and destruction of the harmony of the environment.”’
Yeah, no thanks - Will wait for a reference to Scripture, and/or a quote from a saint...
Forgive me Father for I have sinned. Last Tuesday I used a plastic straw in my super size soda.
Can a Pope be impeached?
This man is a trial.
And lost as lost can be.
*****
6I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel;
7which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.
8But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!
9As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!
Galatians 1:6-9 NASB
That man, along with the leadership is leading the catholic church down the wrong road......time to choose which side of the road folks want to be on....
There's a reason world Leaders meet with Pope in Rome...and it isn't for religious purposes.
Per Summa
I answer that, There is no sin in using a thing for the purpose for which it is. Now the order of things is such that the imperfect are for the perfect, even as in the process of generation nature proceeds from imperfection to perfection. Hence it is that just as in the generation of a man there is first a living thing, then an animal, and lastly a man, so too things, like the plants, which merely have life, are all alike for animals, and all animals are for man. Wherefore it is not unlawful if man use plants for the good of animals, and animals for the good of man, as the Philosopher states (Polit. i, 3).
Now the most necessary use would seem to consist in the fact that animals use plants, and men use animals, for food, and this cannot be done unless these be deprived of life: wherefore it is lawful both to take life from plants for the use of animals, and from animals for the use of men. On fact this is in keeping with the commandment of God Himself: for it is written (Genesis 1:29-30): "Behold I have given you every herb . . . and all trees . . . to be your meat, and to all beasts of the earth": and again (Genesis 9:3): "Everything that moveth and liveth shall be meat to you."
Reply to Objection 1. According to the Divine ordinance the life of animals and plants is preserved not for themselves but for man. Hence, as Augustine says (De Civ. Dei i, 20), "by a most just ordinance of the Creator, both their life and their death are subject to our use."
Reply to Objection 2. Dumb animals and plants are devoid of the life of reason whereby to set themselves in motion; they are moved, as it were by another, by a kind of natural impulse, a sign of which is that they are naturally enslaved and accommodated to the uses of others.
That’s Pagan
Did the Vatican $99 iPhone app come with the hellfire insurance clause too?
“Is the Pope Catholic?” is no longer a rhetorical question.
Enter Martin Luther, Stage Left.
No, that’d be the apparition promoting the false message of the brown scapular some Roman Catholics have fallen for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.