Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24814559
Definitively vaccines do not cause and are not linked to autism. Period end of story.
So a 5 year old study is irrelevant, but Humphries citing a 50 year old study is legitimate?
This is how I know you are not serious, but just a hoodwinked drone endlessly repeating things that are not true while you determinedly refuse real science.
Because a 5 year old meta-study on all the prior studies done on a possible vaccination/autism link must just be wrong because of your beliefs.
Here’s the logic you are missing. If the brain inflammation you claim is causing autism (rather than being a symptom) was caused by vaccines, then basic math would show a strong correlative effect between being vaccinated and being diagnosed with autism, most especially if it were indeed a cumulative effect. But no study has ever found even a correlative relationship.
And no matter how I state the obvious, you circle back to your vaccinations cause autism belief with one lame invalidation of actual scientific fact in favor of your mere belief.
P.S. Saying you can’t read a study, doesn’t make it go away or invalidate the science. Right up there with the dog at my homework.