Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

If it was my bakery, I would make the cake tor them and hand them two brides and two grooms for the cake. Let them put them on the cake.

Actually, I would have just baked the cake.

What’s next? I won’t be able to take a six pack to a certain check out line because it is alcohol is against domeone’s religion. This couplre is trying to impose their religious beliefs on others and now they have cost themselves $135,000. Stupid.


24 posted on 03/05/2017 6:11:42 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gunsequalfreedom
What’s next? I won’t be able to take a six pack to a certain check out line because it is alcohol is against domeone’s religion.

So what? You simply shop elsewhere, meanwhile the guy who owns his business gets to run his business freely without the government forcing him to run it the government's way. That's called "freedom."

This couplre is trying to impose their religious beliefs on others and now they have cost themselves $135,000. Stupid.

Nonsense. They didn't impose themselves on anyone, the "customer" did, by darkening their door, and when being informed that they would not meet the customer's expectations, the customer chose to impose his religious views on them and took them to court. It just so happens that the customer's god is the customer's self interest.

In order for the bakers to "impose their religious beliefs on others" they would have to chase down people, force them to enter their store, hogtie them so they can't leave, and force them to admit Jesus is their savior while threatening them with a plate full of hot cross buns.

31 posted on 03/05/2017 6:23:37 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gunsequalfreedom
What’s next? I won’t be able to take a six pack to a certain check out line because it is alcohol is against domeone’s religion. This couplre is trying to impose their religious beliefs on others and now they have cost themselves $135,000. Stupid.

No. What's stupid is thinking that the government should be in the business of deciding how you and I should be able to run our own lives.

There are countries, and forums, better suited for thinking like yours.

Have you tried DU lately. They'd clearly be much more to your liking.

34 posted on 03/05/2017 6:33:34 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gunsequalfreedom

No...you are not thinking...it’s kinda like employers/companies saying you are not as a CC owner able to bring your gun inside their business. They can say that and suffer the consequences. Here the GOVT is mandating something...not the biz,


37 posted on 03/05/2017 6:54:56 PM PST by goodnesswins (Say hello to President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gunsequalfreedom; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; kinsman redeemer; BlueDragon; metmom; ...
If it was my bakery, I would make the cake tor them and hand them two brides and two grooms for the cake. Let them put them on the cake.

That would still be construed as discriminatory, for the "crime" is not creating the work of art requested, which normally would be done. Which is akin to a black or Jewish business refusing to create a special cake (which Muslim bakeries apparently also refused to do ) , or make a sign for a KKK event. Except in this case the KKK is politically favored.

What’s next? I won’t be able to take a six pack to a certain check out line because it is alcohol is against domeone’s religion. This couplre is trying to impose their religious beliefs on others and now they have cost themselves $135,000. Stupid.

That is simply not analogous, as this was not a case of not serving someone at all, for as Klein said , she was happy to serve the couple in the past and would have been happy to do so again, but added that she simply did not want to be compelled to participate in their wedding, which she said “goes against” her beliefs.

For the sodomite couple was not simply asking to but a cake, or even a standard wedding cake, but for the bakery to make a unique work of art, which specifically celebrated a homosexual union.

My cakes were my canvas,” she said. “My bakery wasn’t just called ‘Sweet Cakes Bakery,’ it was ‘Sweet Cakes by Melissa’ because I pour my passion and heart into each cake I make. My faith is a part of that.”

While liberal rock groups even claim the right to decide who uses their songs, and i am sure such would support the refusal of a Muslim bakery to create a special cake for a celebration of the founding of the modern state of Israel, the Kleins were driven out of business and fine an exorbitant penalty for essentially refusing to salute the flag of Sodom. Which requirement is likely coming to a work place near you.

The problem of course is that SCOTUS basically mandated all 50 states to do the same, and thus they can punish those who did not.

Woe to such a nation.

41 posted on 03/05/2017 7:15:53 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Hey stupid, you don’t have that choice.


49 posted on 03/05/2017 8:46:58 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gunsequalfreedom

What is stupid? Basically you are saying that Christians cannot own businesses. Maybe you don’t believe in God, but these people do. When man’s law contradicts God’s law, a man must follow God’s law.


55 posted on 03/06/2017 2:41:49 AM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson