[ebb tide]

“There is more than what we published,” Ratzinger said. He also told Dollinger that the published part of the Secret is authentic and that the unpublished part of the Secret speaks about “a bad council and a bad Mass” that was to come in the near future.

[Eagles6]

Save

[piusv]

All these actions of Pope Benedict XVI show that he must have known, in his conscience, that he somehow had to correct certain injustices and confusing ambiguities of the recent past. He defended the traditional Mass, he gave back dignity to the SSPX, and he re-inserted the importance of the Fatima message. Additionally, he also tried to deal with the mystery of Vatican II, although, it seems, in too vague of a manner.

And by "dealing" with Vatican II in a "too vague manner" (there's that word vague again!) he too remains part of the problem. This is exactly how the highly touted "conservative" bishops are dealing with it today as well: Burke, Schneider, etc.

[piusv]

From the Fatima Center Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153362412391442&id=95998926441&substory_index=0&hc_location=ufi

It seems Fr Kramer is confirming this.

Why doesn’t Benedict tell the truth to the world? He’s still got time.