So, this anti-technocracy site is against “Chiliastic-evolution,” “Chiliast” meaning the millennial kingdom of Rev. 20. They are against Chiliasm, yet they never say what millennial view they espouse.
I commend the author for being against Communism and Evolutionism, and the false “millennial” that the globalists are working towards, but that doesn’t mean the millennial kingdom of Christ in Rev. 20 is false. Only that their interpretation of it is false.
That satan would hijack something from the Bible for himself, is nothing new.
The author of this piece sounds like he is Amillennial, Preterist, or Postmillennial. If so, he is as guilty of false interpretation as the globalists are.
I am not Dispensational premill, by the way. I am Historic Premill.
The author of this piece sounds like he is Amillennial, Preterist, or Postmillennial. If so, he is as guilty of false interpretation as the globalists are.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linda Kimball, the author, is not espousing any of these in the article. Instead, she is pointing out as you do that Satan is hijacking something from the Bible. That’s what Satan is all about, as you well know - perverting and twisting that which is good into something that is wicked and evil.
And the more of us he can deceive into thinking evil is good, then the less lonely he will be and the more he will yell “I TOLD YOU SO!” to the Father on Judgment Day.
The mention of a belief in a millennium in the article means the belief in a man-made heaven, not in anything initiated or presided over by Christ.
The New Apostolic Reformation is claiming that it is bringing in the millennial kingdom and they, of course, are the apostles that God is giving back to the church to do the job.