Skip to comments.
Is It Ever OK to Lie?
Archdiocese of Washington ^
| 02-02-16
| Msgr. Charles Pope
Posted on 02/03/2016 6:37:39 AM PST by Salvation
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Salvation
My pastor once preached a sermon with an upshot of, "God is truth, therefor anything other than absolute truth is an intrinsic contradiction of God's will."
That said, should people who were hiding Jews during the Holocaust have said, "Why yes, mr. gestapo agent, I do have some Jews in here, right this way..." Of course not.
The difference between lying and not telling the truth is, IMHO, the same difference as the one between murder and self-defense.
To: Salvation
Exodus 5:1
Afterward Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: ‘Let my people go, so that they may hold a festival to me in the wilderness.’”
Hmmm.
22
posted on
02/03/2016 7:02:28 AM PST
by
ThomasThomas
(Veritaphobia The true sign of a liberal.)
To: Salvation
Remember the Commandment, though: "Thou shalt not bear false witness." The commandment is "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor".
23
posted on
02/03/2016 7:03:58 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: ShadowAce
In the example of Anne Frank, given in the OP, the proper response would be no response. The Gestapo would not have accepted silence as a response. A modern-day equivalent in this country won't accept silence either.
24
posted on
02/03/2016 7:06:23 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: NorthMountain
What they accept is their decision. What you provide is yours.
25
posted on
02/03/2016 7:08:01 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Why is it wrong to lie? It is wrong to lie because you are causing harm to your neighbor.
Your silence could be the same as admitting that you’re hiding someone and you would be guilty of sin because of the harm you would have caused.
26
posted on
02/03/2016 7:09:31 AM PST
by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
To: ShadowAce
What they accept is their decision. And their decision is to shoot you between the eyes, right there, tear your house apart, and find the Jewish family you were hiding in your attic, and haul them off to Bergen-Belsen.
27
posted on
02/03/2016 7:10:50 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: Salvation
Did Jesus ever lie? Did He not just keep His mouth shut?
28
posted on
02/03/2016 7:10:59 AM PST
by
Just mythoughts
(Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
To: NorthMountain
Could be. Could be that God would not allow that.
Doesn't matter. I am not God to make that decision. I am His creation to follow His decision to not allow lying.
29
posted on
02/03/2016 7:13:24 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Salvation
How would one then conduct an election?
30
posted on
02/03/2016 7:14:45 AM PST
by
aquila48
To: Salvation
How would one then conduct an election?
31
posted on
02/03/2016 7:14:47 AM PST
by
aquila48
To: MNDude
Your silence could be the same as admitting that youâre hiding someone and you would be guilty of sin because of the harm you would have caused. Silence is admitting nothing. How they interpret your silence is on them.
32
posted on
02/03/2016 7:15:15 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Salvation; NYer; zot; xzins
In the “Anne Frank” example, I’d rather trust Jesus to forgive me for lying to protect a person(s) from being killed by a tyrannical State or a criminal.
I also hope and pray that I will be forgiven for the times I’ve told my mother, who is in hospice, that I’m ok and her grandchildren are in good health. She has always been a worrier, and I see it merciful in saving her from other worries.
These are the only two exceptions I have in my rejection of what was called “situational ethics” back in college philosophical discussions in the late 60s.
33
posted on
02/03/2016 7:16:07 AM PST
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: ShadowAce
May you never be faced with such a decision.
34
posted on
02/03/2016 7:17:43 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: Salvation
Like everything else we do, we have to exercise good judgment and think of the consequences.
Think of the damage you do when you lie, think of the damage you would cause if you tell the truth to the wrong person.
There are people who seek to harm us and we have no obligation to share information they could use to do so.
Lying is wrong but sometimes we have an even larger DUTY to conceal private or confidential information we may have.
The nature of some secrets is such that even evading the question gives away too much information. Then a lie is necessary.
35
posted on
02/03/2016 7:18:20 AM PST
by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: NorthMountain
I hope not. It would be very difficult. I won’t even say I would behave properly in that situation, given the circumstances. But I know what’s right.
36
posted on
02/03/2016 7:20:06 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: All
If someone has an ugly wife, you NEVER say so.
To: Salvation
I think God is more concerned with the motive than the act. So if one lies — admittedly a sin, as the good Monsignor demonstrates — but with a pure heart, then I suspect the Almighty will consider that when passing His awful judgment.
38
posted on
02/03/2016 7:23:56 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: IronJack
I think God is more concerned with the motive than the act. Sorry--the two are always tied together. Sinning means you believe you know better than God. Doesn't matter what you tell yourself.
39
posted on
02/03/2016 7:26:10 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Salvation
WE have choices between good and evil.
Sometimes we must choose between evils, and choose the lesser evil, such as political candidates.
There was a general rule about lying for your own benefit was wrong, but lying (or not telling the truth) to protect others was acceptable.
40
posted on
02/03/2016 7:27:41 AM PST
by
ADSUM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson