Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were Early Churches Ruled by Elders or a Single Bishop?
Canon Fodder ^ | 7/13/2015 | Michael J. Kruger

Posted on 07/15/2015 5:31:40 AM PDT by Gamecock

There is a (seemingly) never-ending debate amongst theologians and pastors about the proper form of government for the church.  For generations, Christians have disagreed about what leadership structure the church ought to use.  From the bishop-led Anglicans to the informal Brethren churches, there is great diversity.

And one of the fundamental flash points in this debate is the practice of the early church.  What form of government did the earliest Christians have?  Of course, early Christian polity is a vast and complex subject with many different issues in play.  But, I want to focus in upon a narrow one: Were the earliest churches ruled by a plurality of elders or a single bishop?

Now it needs to be noted from the outset that by the end of the second century, most churches were ruled by a single bishop. For whatever set of reasons, monepiscopacy had won the day. Many scholars attribute this development to Ignatius.

But, what about earlier? Was there a single-bishop structure in the first and early second century?

The New Testament evidence itself seems to favor a plurality of elders as the standard model. The book of Acts tells us that as the apostles planted churches, they appointed “elders” (from the Greek term πρεσβυτέρος) to oversee them (Acts 11:30; 14:23; 15:2; 20:17). Likewise, Titus is told to “appoint elders in every town” (Titus 1:5).

A very similar word, ἐπι,σκoπος (“bishop” or “overseer”), is used in other contexts to describe what appears to be the same ruling office (Phil 1:1; 1 Tim 3:1-7). The overlap between these two terms is evident in Acts 20:28 when Paul, while addressing the Ephesian “elders” (πρεσβυτέρους), declares that “The Holy Spirit has made you overseers (ἐπισκόπους).” Thus, the New Testament writings indicate that the office of elder/bishop is functionally one and the same.

But, what about the church after the New Testament?  Did they maintain the model of multiple elders?  Three quick examples suggest they maintained this structure at least for a little while:

1. At one point, the Didache addresses the issue of church government directly, “And so, elect for yourselves bishops (ἐπισκόπους) and deacons who are worthy of the Lord, gentle men who are not fond of money, who are true and approved” (15.1). It is noteworthy that the author mentions plural bishops—not a single ruling bishop—and that he places these bishops alongside the office of deacon, as Paul himself does (e.g., Phil 1:1; 1 Tim 3:1-13). Thus, as noted above, it appears that the bishops described here are essentially equivalent to the office of “elder.”

2. A letter known as 1 Clement (c.96) also has much to say about early church governance. This letter is attributed to a “Clement”—whose identity remains uncertain—who represents the church in Rome and writes to the church at Corinth to deal with the fallout of a recent turnover in leadership. The author is writing to convince (not command) the Corinthians to reinstate its bishops (elders) who were wrongly deposed. The letter affirms the testimony of the book of Acts when it tells us that the apostles initially appointed “bishops (ἐπισκόπους) and deacons” in the various churches they visited (42.4). After the time of the apostles, bishops were appointed “by other reputable men with the entire church giving its approval” (44.3). This is an echo of the Didache which indicated that bishops were elected by the church.

3. The Shepherd of Hermas (c.150) provides another confirmation of this governance structure in the second century. After Hermas writes down the angelic vision in a book, he is told, “you will read yours in this city, with the presbyters who lead the church” (Vis. 8.3).Here we are told that the church leadership structure is a plurality of “presbyters” (πρεσβυτέρων) or elders. The author also uses the term “bishop,” but always in the plural and often alongside the office of deacon (Vis. 13.1; Sim. 104.2).

In sum, the NT texts and texts from the early second century indicate that a plurality of elders was the standard structure in the earliest stages. But, as noted above, the idea of a singular bishop began to dominate by the end of the second century.

What led to this transition? Most scholars argue that it was the heretical battles fought by the church in the second century that led them to turn to key leaders to defend and represent the church.

This transition is described remarkably well by Jerome himself:

The presbyter is the same as the bishop, and before parties had been raised up in religion by the provocations of Satan, the churches were governed by the Senate of the presbyters. But as each one sought to appropriate to himself those whom he had baptized, instead of leading them to Christ, it was appointed that one of the presbyters, elected by his colleagues, should be set over all the others, and have chief supervision over the general well-being of the community. . . Without doubt it is the duty of the presbyters to bear in mind that by the discipline of the Church they are subordinated to him who has been given them as their head, but it is fitting that the bishops, on their side, do not forget that if they are set over the presbyters, it is the result of tradition, and not by the fact of a particular institution by the Lord (Comm. Tit. 1.7).

Jerome’s comments provide a great summary of this debate.  While the single-bishop model might have developed for practical reasons, the plurality of elders model seems to go back to the very beginning.


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: one Lord one faith one baptism
Hey, I love articles like this. Maybe some will be tempted to read the didache, clement of Rome, the Shepard and Jerome.

Ya know they may not say what you have been told they say...

61 posted on 07/15/2015 2:13:10 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

Amen - the flesh always wants a man to follow.

Jesus says, “Follow Me.”


62 posted on 07/15/2015 2:29:39 PM PDT by Arlis ( A "Sacred Cow" Tipping Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kandy Atz

Amen.

Did you know that Eph. 4:11 is the ONLY verse in ALL of the NT that contains the word translated “pastor” (English Bibles)?

AND IT’S PLURAL, NOT SINGULAR? Many say the correct translation is “pastor-teachers” as the two words appear to be linked.

AND whereever the Gr. word “poimen” (noun: pastor, shepherd) is found in the NT in it’s SINGULAR form - it is referring to the Lord Jesus? “The Good Shepherd..” “The Chief Shepherd...” etc.

AND whereever the VERB form of poimen is found, as something which is DONE, it refers TO THE ELDERS!

Incredible that a vast majority of “Bible believing” Christians have bought into a carnal religious system that places men where God never meant them to be with absolutely no scriptural basis for doing so. The arguments those who put forth who support this system are so weak and feeble, they’d themselves would thoroughly reject any other theological arguments by others wholeheartedly that had a similar foundation.

But the pastor system is an absolute necessity for the survival and promotion of any organization of man.


63 posted on 07/15/2015 2:42:23 PM PDT by Arlis ( A "Sacred Cow" Tipping Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism

“The Latin speaking bishops at Carthage may have had something to do with setting the canon, but happily in those years the Latins and Greeks were one.”

Indeed they did, though we always viewed that council at Carthage in 397 as a nice effort by our country cousins....except for the Revelations book. I hear we have a dusty copy of that one on a top shelf somewhere over at the church! :)

It was nice to be One. Maybe we will be again soon. Next Year in Constantinople?!


64 posted on 07/15/2015 2:53:23 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Elsie

Funny. That’s the way all the Catholics I know talked.


65 posted on 07/15/2015 2:55:38 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; one Lord one faith one baptism; Elsie; metmom

“Seeing the Church Fathers, had exactly the same scriptural base that we do today.”

Oh, but that’s not true at all. One of the greatest Fathers, +Athanasius of Alexandria, was dead before the nearest canon to what you folks use was even established. Same goes for +Justin Martyr, +Ireneaus of Lyon. +Basil the Great, +Gregory of Nyssa, the later two dying within just a few years from the date of the Council of carthage. The list is longer, btw.


66 posted on 07/15/2015 3:07:10 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism; Kolokotronis; avenir; RnMomof7; Gamecock
>>Maybe some will be tempted to read the didache, clement of Rome, the Shepard and Jerome.<<

Scripture will do. God's word trumps all of them. Besides, God said He would never tempt us so temptations do NOT come from God.

67 posted on 07/15/2015 3:08:58 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

The Scripture was still in existance and they had that whether it had the Catholic church stamp of approval or not.


68 posted on 07/15/2015 3:13:39 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism
Surely that is what the first and second century practice was. Right?

Let's ask the angel that told John to write to the 7 Catholic churches in Asia.

69 posted on 07/15/2015 3:46:11 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism
Maybe some will be tempted to read the didache, clement of Rome, the Shepard and Jerome.

While others ...

... will be tempted to read (and study) the Bible; like the NOBLE Bereans did.

70 posted on 07/15/2015 3:49:00 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism
Bravo, more Church Fathers please.

I'll give you some GOOD ones first:

As regards the oft-quoted Mt. 16:18

 

Augustine, sermon:

"Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter's confession. What is Peter's confession? 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' There's the rock for you, there's the foundation, there's where the Church has been built, which the gates of the underworld cannot conquer.John Rotelle, O.S.A., Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine , © 1993 New City Press, Sermons, Vol III/6, Sermon 229P.1, p. 327

Upon this rock, said the Lord, I will build my Church. Upon this confession, upon this that you said, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God,' I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not conquer her (Mt. 16:18). John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City, 1993) Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 236A.3, p. 48.

 

Augustine, sermon:

For petra (rock) is not derived from Peter, but Peter from petra; just as Christ is not called so from the Christian, but the Christian from Christ. For on this very account the Lord said, 'On this rock will I build my Church,' because Peter had said, 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.' On this rock, therefore, He said, which thou hast confessed, I will build my Church. For the Rock (Petra) was Christ; and on this foundation was Peter himself built. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Christ Jesus. The Church, therefore, which is founded in Christ received from Him the keys of the kingdom of heaven in the person of Peter, that is to say, the power of binding and loosing sins. For what the Church is essentially in Christ, such representatively is Peter in the rock (petra); and in this representation Christ is to be understood as the Rock, Peter as the Church. — Augustine Tractate CXXIV; Philip Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: First Series, Volume VII Tractate CXXIV (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf107.iii.cxxv.html)

 

Augustine, sermon:

And Peter, one speaking for the rest of them, one for all, said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God (Mt 16:15-16)...And I tell you: you are Peter; because I am the rock, you are Rocky, Peter-I mean, rock doesn't come from Rocky, but Rocky from rock, just as Christ doesn't come from Christian, but Christian from Christ; and upon this rock I will build my Church (Mt 16:17-18); not upon Peter, or Rocky, which is what you are, but upon the rock which you have confessed. I will build my Church though; I will build you, because in this answer of yours you represent the Church. — John Rotelle, O.S.A. Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1993), Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 270.2, p. 289

 

Augustine, sermon:

Peter had already said to him, 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.' He had already heard, 'Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona, because flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the underworld shall not conquer her' (Mt 16:16-18)...Christ himself was the rock, while Peter, Rocky, was only named from the rock. That's why the rock rose again, to make Peter solid and strong; because Peter would have perished, if the rock hadn't lived. — John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City, 1993) Sermons, Volume III/7, Sermon 244.1, p. 95

 

Augustine, sermon:

...because on this rock, he said, I will build my Church, and the gates of the underworld shall not overcome it (Mt. 16:18). Now the rock was Christ (1 Cor. 10:4). Was it Paul that was crucified for you? Hold on to these texts, love these texts, repeat them in a fraternal and peaceful manner. — John Rotelle, Ed., The Works of Saint Augustine (New Rochelle: New City Press, 1995), Sermons, Volume III/10, Sermon 358.5, p. 193

 

Augustine, Psalm LXI:

Let us call to mind the Gospel: 'Upon this Rock I will build My Church.' Therefore She crieth from the ends of the earth, whom He hath willed to build upon a Rock. But in order that the Church might be builded upon the Rock, who was made the Rock? Hear Paul saying: 'But the Rock was Christ.' On Him therefore builded we have been. — Philip Schaff, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), Volume VIII, Saint Augustin, Exposition on the Book of Psalms, Psalm LXI.3, p. 249. (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf108.ii.LXI.html)

 

• Augustine, in “Retractions,”

In a passage in this book, I said about the Apostle Peter: 'On him as on a rock the Church was built.'...But I know that very frequently at a later time, I so explained what the Lord said: 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church,' that it be understood as built upon Him whom Peter confessed saying: 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,' and so Peter, called after this rock, represented the person of the Church which is built upon this rock, and has received 'the keys of the kingdom of heaven.' For, 'Thou art Peter' and not 'Thou art the rock' was said to him. But 'the rock was Christ,' in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called Peter. But let the reader decide which of these two opinions is the more probable. — The Fathers of the Church (Washington D.C., Catholic University, 1968), Saint Augustine, The Retractations Chapter 20.1:.

 


71 posted on 07/15/2015 3:50:37 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism
and then wait for terycarl to appear here before posting the BAD ones.
72 posted on 07/15/2015 3:51:29 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; Elsie
Cor;4 6 Now, brothers and sisters, I have applied these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, “Do not go beyond what is written.” Then you will not be puffed up in being a follower of one of us over against the other.
73 posted on 07/15/2015 3:52:39 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
Oh, but that’s not true at all

The scriptures were written and available

E html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">


The New Testament Canon

New Testament Books Treated as Traditional Scripture by Early Writers

Italic type indicates that the writer either does not mention the book or expressed some doubt about the status of the book.


Athanasius
(b. 296)

Origen
(b. 185)

Irenaeus
(b. 130)

Marcion*
(b. 85)

Matthew Matthew Matthew
Mark Mark Mark
Luke Luke Luke Luke
John John John
Acts Acts Acts
Romans Romans Romans Romans
1 Corinthians 1 Corinthians 1 Corinthians 1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians 2 Corinthians 2 Corinthians 2 Corinthians
Galatians Galatians Galatians Galatians
Ephesians Ephesians Ephesians Ephesians
Philippians Philippians Philippians Philippians
Colossians Colossians Colossians Colossians
1 Thessalonians 1 Thessalonians 1 Thessalonians 1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy 1 Timothy 1 Timothy
2 Timothy 2 Timothy 2 Timothy
Titus Titus Titus
Philemon Philemon Philemon Philemon
Hebrews Hebrews Hebrews
James James James
1 Peter 1 Peter 1 Peter
2 Peter 2 Peter 2 Peter
1 John 1 John 1 John
2 John 2 John 2 John
3 John 3 John 3 John
Jude Jude Jude
Revelation** Revelation Revelation


* Marcion's views were peculiar to his sect. He was aware of the fact that many of the other books were read as scripture in most churches.

** The Revelation of John was first received and then rejected by many churches in Asia Minor.





74 posted on 07/15/2015 3:57:14 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: metmom
"The Scripture was still in existance and they had that whether it had the Catholic church stamp of approval or not.

Yup, hundreds of them. BTW, I'm not a Latin, but I most certainly am a member of the One, Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, as my family has been for at least 1800 years!

75 posted on 07/15/2015 4:02:21 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Where did your list come from? The links don’t work.


76 posted on 07/15/2015 4:07:34 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

http://www.bible-researcher.com/canon3.html


77 posted on 07/15/2015 4:09:36 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

You may like this one well

http://www.bible.ca/b-canon-apostolic-fathers-apologists.htm’’';


78 posted on 07/15/2015 4:17:58 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

There is no “proper form,” that’s why the New Testament and the apostles are so vague on the subject. The church adapts itself to differing cultures, adaptability is one of the great things about christianity.

If it was such a critical question to have a single form, it would have been addressed. The early church saw two influences in this issue. One was the more “elder” oriented Jewish tradition of the Beth Knesset, the other the hierarchical traditions and lesser educated state of the gentile world.

As the church moved into the gentile world an episcopal form was probably an excellent choice. At that point, the church was drawing millions of illiterate believers (which also explains the rise of icons as educational tools which morphed later into worship materials, which in turn evolved into objects which unfortunately became widely misunderstood as having inherent powers).

But we don’t live in that world, the pattern of a single or a small handful of educated specialists implies that the general populations do not have the Holy Spirit informing them, that they have no easy access to the scriptures or scholarship and that their understanding is irrelevant. Now that the laity is often well informed, often can be well inform, the culture of the church is different.

Some people grow in faith through the Orthodox or Catholic or Anglican forms, others thrive in Presbyterian environments, and still others in Congregational forms.

Being one in Christ does not mean being one in style. Variety can be our friend.


79 posted on 07/15/2015 4:18:31 PM PDT by cookcounty ("I was a Democrat until I learned to count" --Maine Gov. Paul LePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Thank-you. So as you can see, it was GREEKS who determined the canon of scripture....

The story behind Hebrews and Revelations being part of the Canon is an interesting one. Apparently it came about as part of a deal between the Latin Church and the Eastern, Greek speaking Churches, one for the other.


80 posted on 07/15/2015 4:18:45 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson