Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calvin And American Exceptionalism (Protestant Caucus)
newrepublic.com ^ | July 9, 2009 | Damon Linker

Posted on 10/31/2014 10:52:35 AM PDT by Gamecock

Once an idea is unleashed upon the world, there's no telling where it will lead. That is one lesson to be drawn from studying the astonishing influence of John Calvin's theology on the subsequent history of the world.

Born five hundred years ago today, Calvin deepened the Protestant Reformation by building on Martin Luther's break from Rome, formulating a sternly ascetic version of Christian piety that, as Max Weber powerfully argued more than a century ago, inadvertently laid the psychological groundwork for the development of capitalism.

Others have noted the surprising ways that Calvinist ideas helped to legitimize representative political institutions. Less widely acknowledged, though no less historically significant, is the profound impact of Calvinist assumptions on the formation of American patriotism -- and in particular on the country's sense of itself as an exceptional nation empowered by providence to bring democracy, liberty, and Christian redemption to the world.

It is this persistent theological self-confidence (some would say over-confidence) that distinguishes American patriotism from expressions of communal feeling in any other modern nation -- and that demonstrates our nation's unexpected but nonetheless decisive debt to John Calvin.

Early modern Christians in the Calvinist tradition strongly emphasized the absolute sovereignty of God, insisting that God ultimately controls all events in the natural world and human history. In the exacting language of the Presbyterian Church's Westminster Confession of Faith (1649), "God, the great Creator of all things, doth uphold, direct, dispose, and govern all creatures, actions, and things, from the greatest to the least, by his most wise and holy providence."

The various Protestant groups that affirmed these and other similarly austere Calvinist doctrines longed to establish a purified Christian church independent of existing ecclesiastical institutions. In England, this desire placed these "Puritans" and other Christian separatists at odds with both the Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches, resulting at several points during the late-sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries in civil unrest and violent persecution.

Many of the radical Calvinists who resolved to leave England to establish colonies in the newly discovered continent of North America believed themselves to be reenacting the exodus of the Hebrews from bondage in ancient Egypt. Having freely joined in a covenant with God and resolved to build a purified church and holy city in the New World, the Puritans boarded their ships confident that the Lord would guide and protect them on their "errand into the wilderness." When William Bradford stepped off the Mayflower in 1620, he quoted Jeremiah: "Come let us declare in Zion the word of God." Ten years later, John Winthrop wrote in the midst of his voyage to America, "The work we have in hand, it is by mutual consent through a special overruling providence . . . to seek out a place of cohabitation and consorting under a due form of government both civil and ecclesiastical."

Once they established the New England colonies, many of the leading Puritans became more convinced than ever that it was within their communities that the Lord would "create a new heaven, and a new earth, new churches, and a new commonwealth together.

"It didn't turn out that way, of course, as conflicts and dissention within the colonies led to numerous schisms, expulsions, and the eventual dilution of the strenuous Puritan ethic. Yet the idea that the original colonists had come, with God's aid and assistance, to establish a new Israel on American shores managed to persist.

Late in the seventeenth century, Cotton Mather claimed that John Winthrop had been "picked out for the work" of founding New England "by the provident hand of the most high," while William Bradford was a "Moses" who happily served as "an instrument" of the Almighty in establishing "Israel in America."

Minister Thomas Thacher of Boston's Old South Church concurred with the judgment, boldly asserting that "we are the people that do succeed Israel." Clergyman and historian Thomas Prince nicely summed up the theological consensus on the topic when he observed in 1730 that "there never was any people on earth so parallel in their general history to that of the ancient Israelites as this of New England." (This was, of course, more than two centuries before the nefarious "Israel Lobby" set up shop in the nation's capital.)Having made the basic analogy between Puritan New England and ancient Israel, some extended the comparison even further, to speculate about the perhaps decisive place of the American colonies in sacred history.

In Calvinist interpretations of the Hebrew Bible, Israel was usually portrayed as a nation chosen by God to preserve his law until His Son arrived to purify and promulgate it throughout the world. Israel was thus a divine crucible and a providential conduit for the gospels. And so, it seemed, was America -- a nation chosen by God to proclaim the repristinized Christianity of the Protestant Reformation to all peoples.Early in the eighteenth century, the vision of America as a new Israel specially chosen by God to perform a divine mission was primarily limited to the Puritan and post-Puritan elite of New England.

But by the middle of the century, the more modest views of providence that until that time had dominated throughout the mid-Atlantic and Southern colonies had been supplanted by the stringent Calvinism of Massachusetts and Connecticut.

America was New Englandized. According to historian John F. Berens, the motor behind this extraordinary transformation was the Great Awakening of the 1740s, which helped to spread theological concepts throughout the colonies. In the electrifying sermons of George Whitefield, Jonathan Edwards, Gilbert Tennent, Samuel Davies, and many other preachers, colonists from New York to South Carolina encountered for the first time the potent providential ideas that had previously transfixed the minds of the Puritan settlers of New England.

Not that these ideas were identical to the ones that originally inspired John Winthrop, Cotton Mather, and other seventeenth-century writers. On the contrary, American providential thinking evolved dramatically as it circulated throughout the colonies. As Berens notes, the French and Indian War (1754-1763), which followed immediately on the heels of the Great Awakening, contributed decisively to the transformation. For the first time, Americans began to define themselves in contrast to a vision of tyranny -- namely, the (political and religious) absolutism of Catholic France.

Unlike France, they concluded, the American colonies were a bastion of political and religious freedom. This freedom had been won, moreover, with the help of God's providence, which would continue to protect the colonies in times of danger, provided the colonists proved themselves worthy of it by maintaining their divinely favored civil and religious institutions. In Berens's words, by 1763 -- a full thirteen years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the outbreak of war with Great Britain over the supposedly tyrannical usurpations of King George III -- the "ever-increasing intercolonial conviction that America was the New Israel" had come to mean that the colonies "had been assigned a providential mission somehow connected to the advancement of civil and religious freedom.

"Through the Revolutionary War, the years surrounding the ratification of the federal Constitution, and the early national period, pastors and presidents repeatedly praised the "great design of providence" that had led to the creation of a country dedicated to protecting and preserving political and religious liberty.

Call it the consolidation of America's Calvinist consensus. What were once the rather extreme theological convictions dominating a handful of rustic outposts on the edge of a wholly undeveloped continent were now the unifying and motivating ideology of a rapidly expanding and industrializing nation.

Whatever difficulties the new nation faced -- from the traumas of the War of 1812 to the gradual escalation of regional hostilities that ultimately issued in the Civil War -- Americans remained remarkably confident that God was committed to the survival and success of its experiment in free government and would continue to intervene providentially in its affairs to ensure that outcome.

This confidence received an additional boost from the Second Great Awakening that swept through wide swaths of the new nation in the early decades of the nineteenth century. Many of those caught up in the intense revivalistic fervor of the time became convinced that they were living through the last days of human history prior to the advent of a thousand-year reign of Christian peace and prosperity on earth.

Millennial hopes and fears left long-lasting marks on older Protestant sects (like the Baptists and Methodists) and inspired the founding of eccentric new ones (like the Mormons and Seventh-Day Adventists). But they also added an eschatological dimension to American thinking about providence. What if God had created the United States to serve as the model for millennial perfection that would prefigure the second coming of Christ? Such questions had titillated the minds of American Christians since the time of the Puritans, but they began to be posed with renewed vigor as millennial passions reached unprecedented heights in the 1810s and ‘20s.

The ideology of "manifest destiny" that emerged in the 1840s and inspired the policy of westward expansion through the remainder of the century was an outgrowth of this newly millenarian form of Calvinist providentialism. The man who coined the term, journalist John L. O'Sullivan, insisted that it was "by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which providence has given us for the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government." Decades later, after the closing of the frontier, writer Robert Ellis Thompson penned a study of The Hand of God in American History, which likewise proclaimed that from the time of the first settlements to the Spanish-American War God had "shaped the course of our national history for his own ends."

It was a sentiment amplified by statesman-historian Albert J. Beveridge in a speech before the U.S. Senate in which he voiced unambiguous support for American annexation of the Philippines. As far as Senator Beveridge was concerned, God

has given us the spirit of progress to overwhelm the forces of reaction throughout the earth. He has made us adept at government that we may administer government among savage and senile peoples. Were it not for such a force as this the world would relapse into barbarism and night. And of all our race he has marked the American people as his chosen nation to finally lead in the redemption of the world.

Economic and scientific progress directed by God and actualized by Americans, divinely ordained political accomplishments issuing in divinely sanctioned global hegemony by the United States, and God's election of America to redeem the world -- these were the essential elements of American providence at the dawn of the twentieth century.

Over subsequent decades, as the political, economic, military, and cultural power of the United States expanded beyond anyone's expectations, providential thinking continued to play an important role in defining American national identity and in setting the terms of public debate.

Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy outlook, including his proposal for a League of Nations that would make possible an era of global perpetual peace, grew out of his strong faith America's providential role in the world. The World War II propaganda campaign frequently appealed to identical convictions. And politicians from both political parties regularly cast the Cold War as a quasi-eschatological conflict between forces of darkness and light -- with God clearly standing on America's side of the battle.

Even Adlai Stevenson, the Democratic Party's answer to the "anti-intellectualism" of Dwight D. Eisenhower, spoke unapologetically in 1952 about the "awesome mission" that "God has set for us," which was nothing less than "the leadership of the free world."

In more recent years, the cadences of the Calvinist consensus could be heard in Ronald Reagan's rhetorical evocations of America as a "city on a hill" and George W. Bush's frequent assurances that history moves in a "visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of liberty." No commemoration of John Calvin's birth can be complete without recognizing this momentous American legacy. Whatever our views of American exceptionalism and its complicated human consequences, it is Calvin who deserves to be recognized as its unintended instigator.


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/31/2014 10:52:35 AM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

In the past you, or one of your predecessors, said that other faith groups can be mentioned in a Caucus as long as was of historical nature and not a doctrinal issue.

I believe this article does just that. If I am wrong please remove the caucus status.


2 posted on 10/31/2014 10:54:32 AM PDT by Gamecock (USA, Ret. 27 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
May I borrow this?


3 posted on 10/31/2014 10:56:12 AM PDT by Gamecock (USA, Ret. 27 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Calvin founded capitalism?

If capitalism is supposed to be something above and beyond ordinary market freedom, I’d be really interested in what that extra dimension is. It sounds so much like giving glory to dollars rather than the Deity. I’m not sure even Calvin would go for that.


4 posted on 10/31/2014 10:57:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Diet of Worms?
5 posted on 10/31/2014 10:59:38 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
As far as Senator Beveridge was concerned, God "has given us the spirit of progress to overwhelm the forces of reaction throughout the earth. He has made us adept at government that we may administer government among savage and senile peoples."

Being a Democrat mouthpiece, the New Republic just couldn't resist equating past expansion of liberties to religion, racism and classism.

6 posted on 10/31/2014 11:05:48 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is better to offend a human being than to offend God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Calvin!


7 posted on 10/31/2014 11:13:34 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Not all Muslims are terrorists but all Muslims are potential terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

8 posted on 10/31/2014 11:20:03 AM PDT by Gamecock (USA, Ret. 27 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

LOL!


9 posted on 10/31/2014 11:40:43 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Not all Muslims are terrorists but all Muslims are potential terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Market freedom is slightly different because a free market doesn't result in everyone being a capitalist. Some will squander in a free market environment, but others will save and/or invest the capital they've formed.

The use of capital to expand wealth or power does not detract from deity in itself. In fact, many times it will reflect the glory of God as others are benefited through the investment through charity, jobs, civic improvement etc. Jesus talked about loving your fellow man. We've heard that a rising tide lifts all boats. Doesn't God like to see all boats lifted?

10 posted on 10/31/2014 11:55:32 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

For those of us with Calvinist settler roots, this is the truth of America which a determined group of newcomers have worked hard for the past century or so to extinguish.

America is the expression of the Reformation and the Englightenment, buttressed by the political evolution of Britain especially.

We are now far away from that, and just in the last 50 years as the determined assault on our basic beliefs and culture came to fruition.

At some point, those of us who remember the old America need to ask: are we bound by the attitudes and initiatives of the newcomers? Those who came to disestablish our egalitarian and morally driven nation?

We are told repeatedly that we should extend tolerance to all because that is our creed too. Maybe so, but when the legal and social aspects of our creed are simply snuffed out by their votes, their judicial decrees, their cultural and legal norms....are we still in our nation?

Are we powerless to re-establish that success which attracted them here, only to undermine it?

This is the ascendant question for the Americans...whether our land and nation is still ours...or simply vanished. And do we simply shrug and live with that?


11 posted on 10/31/2014 11:56:24 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Both sides of my family settled here in the 1660’s. We have fought in every war in this nation’s history. We have lived and died by the decree that we are free and independent people capable of setting our own course. We have been farmers, laborers, ministers, doctors, politicians, teachers, business makers and more.
We offer our way of life for those willing to accept and build on what we have created. We do not accede to those who wish to come and destroy what we have built. We will fight them as we have fought every despot who has tried to take away what we have created.
This current cabal of louts and desperados ruining our country will be stopped. They have no place here and will be thrown out if they continue to insist that we owe them anything more than opportunity to work and build for themselves their own homestead.
Our churches, schools, businesses and government are threatened by interlopers seeking to steal and conscript for themselves. This will not stand. We will do what is necessary to restore the opportunity our fathers and mothers lived and died to secure.


12 posted on 10/31/2014 12:13:43 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: sasportas

Before somebody dings me on this, Bradford and the early Calvinists, at this point in history, may have been postmillennial not Amillennial. An example would be George Whitfield and Jonathan Edwards, they were both postmill.


14 posted on 10/31/2014 2:09:36 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Man, it would be nice to have a real friend like you. It’s tough to be upbeat living in lost territory here in Broward county FL, home of dws and my “rep” alcee hastings the zombies elected.


15 posted on 10/31/2014 3:31:10 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (Linux rocks. TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

A lot of good friends here in Venice, Fl. Move on up.


16 posted on 10/31/2014 3:35:30 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson