Time for new reformation re: understanding of Biblical priesthood, sainthood, & ordination [Vanity]

Colofornian | June 26, 2014 | Colofornian

[BlueDragon]

Wait a second.

First things first.

I'm not here to be interviewed.

No questions. I'm not here to be "inspected" or to face your own version of Inquisition.

I was writing to you to show you how what you have been doing here, doesn't work.

If you want any answers out of me -- you have to deal with what I'm telling you -- first.

[af_vet_1981]

Wait a second. First things first. I'm not here to be interviewed. No questions. I'm not here to be "inspected" or to face your own version of Inquisition. I was writing to you ...

Simple; then don't write to me, and I will not respond to you.

[BlueDragon]

No deal.

I will not be silenced.

Not by you.

Now that that is out of the way, are you going to deal with how you put words in another's mouth -- or not?

[Elsie]

His intending meaning in #16, has yet to be established.

Usually; I do NOT lay the eggs; I merely color them.

This time; I just tossed the eggs onto the ground, and the egg suckers went to work.

[Elsie]

It is about the ordination of women, divorce, abortion, and contraception in the Wesleyan Church.

???

[Elsie]

Simple; then don't write to me, and I will not respond to you.

I still love ya, AF.

I'll respond to your stuff, even if you don't write back.

[af_vet_1981]

Your post 16 is on this thread.

[BlueDragon]

Usually; I do NOT lay the eggs; I merely color them.

This time; I just tossed the eggs onto the ground, and the egg suckers went to work.

I tried to warn them, but it was off to the races. With scissors in their hands?

Edward had an excuse. It was just a movie?

[Elsie]

Your post 16 is on this thread.

Ya just GOTTA keep the threads straight when you are replying!

---

---

---

 

 

To: Springfield Reformer

Bottom line, I still hold your charge against Elsie is baseless. He did NOT write what you said he wrote. You interpreted first,

Of course I interpreted it. If I quote him directly I'll indicate so. afsnco post 12, Elsie post 16, clear as day; He clearly rejected the authority of the apostle Paul in this matter, and the clear teaching of the holy catholic apostolic church for almost two millenia, to uphold the doctrine of the Wesleyan Church.

938 posted on ‎7‎/‎4‎/‎2014‎ ‎10‎:‎41‎:‎22‎ ‎PM by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

---

---

---

Bottom line, I still hold your charge against Elsie is baseless. He did NOT write what you said he wrote. You interpreted first,

[Elsie]

Your post 16 is on this thread.

 

 

 

 

To: afsnco

Every denomination that has engaged in the apostasy of women clergy has inevitably, inexorably thereafter engaged in the further apostasies of love for abortion and love for homosexuality.

The bible PLAINILY says it's PAUL that won't allow women to teach: NOT Christ!!

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

 

16 posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2014‎ ‎6‎:‎27‎:‎10‎ ‎PM by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

 

[Elsie]

Are you saying that one or both of them are lying?
HMMMmmm...

What did I type?

Your parser ring broken?

[verga]

What did I type?

Your parser ring broken?

I am parsing nothing, I asked a question and you have yet to answer it. Here is what I asked: Just so I am clear: Are you saying that one or both of them are lying?

Simple question. Either A) Colton did see Mary in heaven and his father wrote the truth, which makes you mistaken/ in error. Or B) one or both of them is lying and you are correct.

So which is it? Are they telling the truth and you are wrong or are you correct and at least one of them is a liar?

We have all seen you make the statement that "Mary is dead." repeatedly. Now there is someone of your own faith, and ordained minister no less contradicting you. We have all seen the patented smarmy wise acre answer, now give us the straight answer with our dodging, like you usually do.

[Salvation]

LOL! I don’t even know what it said.

But I forgive him for whatever it was.

[NKP_Vet]

“It’s in the catechism. All someone has to do is read it.

Then it is impossible for someone to be poorly ‘catechized’.

Everything NEEDED is in the bible.

All someone has to do is read it”.

Then you need to get away from your Jimmy Swaggart Expositor Study Bible or any of the other thousands and thousands of study guides on the market to help protestants understand the Bible.

[Elsie]

Only two choices?

[Elsie]

i do???

[verga]

Yes: There are only two, please quit dodging.

[narses]

Simple question. Either A) Colton did see Mary in heaven and his father wrote the truth, which makes you mistaken/ in error. Or B) one or both of them is lying and you are correct.

[verga]

Elsie I am feeling bad for asking you such a difficult question. Let me ask a slightly different one that might be easier for you to answer.

Is Colton going to hell for engaging in necromancy. We know that he spoke to his unborn sister and the woman's dead Marine son. IIRC he also spoke to his great grand father that Todd was never sure was "saved" until Colton told him he was in heaven.

So how about it big guy. Is this kid going to hell for speaking to the dead? We know for a fact he claims to have spoken to a minimum of four "dead" people (Yeah I am going to count Mary). And if it is okay for him to do this, how is it different from Catholics and the Saints?

[Elsie]

Since I’m always correct, it has to be B.