Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

Toward the end of the debate, HH must have realized he had lost the debate. About all he had left in his bag of tricks was to snarl at Mark Hitchcock for saying he was a Preterist.

Amazingly, he argues for Preterism throughout the debate then turns around and denies that is what he is; acting highly offended when he is asked “If you claim you are not a Preterist, what then are you?” His answer, “I’m an investigative eschatologist” is cowardly... and hilarious. Preterists, I’ve noticed, are like that, very shy about admitting that is what they are.


7 posted on 03/03/2014 1:04:22 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sasportas

Correction:
when HH denied he was a Preterist, he said he was a “Exegetical Eschatologist.” What a cop out.


8 posted on 03/03/2014 1:22:30 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: sasportas

Right after the debate, HH said that the debate would have destroyed his ministry .... I guees HH has ‘recovered” since, because his show is still on the air....

every time I hear his voice, i turn the dial.


9 posted on 03/03/2014 1:47:18 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson