Why? Is the title misleading? Is the article altogether unconcerned with the title? Does the author speak of matters indifferent to the titles content, not either in favor of, or in opposition to the purported subject?
Up to this point, Ive addressed myself only to the title. Up to this point, in their reply, no one has applied themselves to the title.
Read the article instead of jumping to any conclusion based on the title. The conclusions jumped to in your post are wrong.