Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is Life/Non-life in Nature?
self | June 23, 2008 | Vanity

Posted on 06/23/2008 3:05:46 PM PDT by betty boop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-725 next last
To: betty boop
Certainly it has no theory of Man, who is a biological organism. I keep harping on that; but to me it's important. Because it doesn't, fools are led to believe that Man is "only" just the "smartest animal" on the block. At the same time, may your deity help you if you should ever suggest that Man is the culmination of the Tree of Life!

LOLOL!

Thank you so very much for your encouragements, dearest sister in Christ!

61 posted on 06/28/2008 11:59:32 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
This is an example of something I drew your attention to earlier, that man displays a facility for transforming the evolutionary space in which he himself evolves. Darwin's theory does not address this question. Therefore, I maintain that it is an incomplete theory.

How could you possibly be more clear?!

Indeed, man's proclivity for transforming the evolutionary space in which he evolves sets him apart. Although many animals are known to chose their mates and thus affect "certain features" of their offspring by "intelligent cause" - man imagines things, intends things, willfully does things which effects the entire biosphere.

How long before another Wimmer invents an "information sequence" and then brings a new virus into the biosphere for good or ill?

Thank you so very much for all of your insights, dearest sister in Christ!

62 posted on 06/28/2008 12:06:06 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
You're quite welcome, dear brother in Christ, I'm glad you like it!
63 posted on 06/28/2008 12:07:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Pair bonding is quite common among social animals. Humans have not created a space wherein they are immune from selective pressure. Sickle cell anemia is common where malaria was endemic. Dark skin is common where sunlight as a mutagen is a problem. Light skin is common where vitamin D synthesis is a problem due to lack of sunlight. Lactose persistence is common in populations that traditionally kept cattle. Sexual selection happens every day. There is genetic drift and founder effects. There is antagonistic pleotropy weighing in the balance the prevalence of certain traits.

Our intelligence in no way has made us immune to selective pressure. Indeed intelligence is something that people mate assortivly for along with a host of other traits including (interestingly enough) mid digital hair and incisor length. Strangely enough I have never said “look at the incisor's on that babe!”. ;)

64 posted on 06/28/2008 12:14:00 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

“If there were no resonance in the three-helium reaction at the precise thermal energy of a star’s core, there would be no life at all.” Watch out, Lady Bird, Al Gore will charge you ‘carbon’ credits on that ...


65 posted on 06/28/2008 12:52:24 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop
[ On your other point about what energy "is" etc - I must demur because, like our previous attempts to discuss dimensionality, I tend to speak in classic terms and our conversation would be confusing to lurkers. ]

True.... dimensions, realms, multi realities are quite beyond a humans speculation.. as a human.. Any speculation or view of reality is just that.. a view.. an observation.. John ch 10 seems to indicate humans have particular view(s) or realities, not always homogeneous except within certain intellectual and/or spiritual comfort zones.. called sheep pens.. And that is where they are SUPPOSED to be.. Self sorting realities.. Is one better than another?.. Probably not..

What a lovely plan God has, where humans can self sort themselves into sheep pens.. inditing themselves on one hand and satisfying themselves on the other.. What energy IS can probably be a lot of things.. as well as matter.. Water can possibly be a metaphor or object lesson for humans to understand energy/matter.. Water is indeed some strange stuff.. gaseous, solid or liquid or even oxygen merged with helium.. and ice floats.. so lakes/oceans don't freeze over.. Human bodies are mostly water operating much as the planet itself does.. Pure wonder is this earthly eco-system.. An accident?.. chance?.. it takes arrogance to say yes.. The human body is wondrous but the very planets mechanics are even more wondrous.. possibly, probably, even unique in the universe..

The leap to a spiritual dimension is not hard to make..

66 posted on 06/28/2008 7:32:08 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl
[ to believe that Man is "only" just the "smartest animal" on the block ]

No animal ever existed that worshipped anything.. If man were an animal then they finally evolved to invent God(s).. then that scared them, then some of them un-invented "him".. and became mammals again..

67 posted on 06/28/2008 7:39:53 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Wow, Pipe, I didn’t take you to be such a mystik. You’d like my quiet porch at three AM on a summer’s evening.


68 posted on 06/28/2008 8:30:14 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
LOLOL!
69 posted on 06/28/2008 9:46:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

Pure wonder is this earthly eco-system.. An accident?.. chance?.. it takes arrogance to say yes..

Indeed.

70 posted on 06/28/2008 9:52:31 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
"Consider also that the universe itself seems to be “informed,” in the sense of displaying evidence of some remarkable “fine-tuning” that guides its evolution. Physical chemistry itself rests on, is informed by, deeper principles: the physical laws, which in turn depend on certain ubiquitous universal constants — the speed of light; the value of pi; Plank’s constant; Plank time; the resonance precision required for the existence of carbon (a necessary element for life); the explosive power of the Big Bang precisely matched to the power of gravity (its density precisely matched with the critical density of the universe); the delicate balance in the strong nuclear force; the precise balancing of gravitational force and electromagnetic force; the meticulous balance between the number of electrons and protons; the precision in electromagnetic force and the ratio of proton mass to electron mass and neutron mass to proton mass; the Big Bang’s defiance of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and gravity’s cumulative effect; etc., for examples." [excerpt, bold emphasis mine]

I see Evolution, The Big Bang, etc, all grouped with things like the speed of light, The constant π and the laws of physics, etc, and so it leaves me wondering, do you consider them equal?

Has the Big Bang ever been observed to defy the second law of thermodynamics?

It appears that your are stating as fact things that have not been observed.

Care to clarify?

Thanks.
71 posted on 06/29/2008 12:05:19 AM PDT by Fichori (Primitive goat herder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
"oxygen merged with helium"

Errrr... Did you mean, "hydrogen"?

72 posted on 06/29/2008 6:02:34 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

I think he is right, the oxygen/helium mix is being used for deep sea diving. It’s called HeliOx. It is used a lot by University of Miami School of Marine Science located on Biscayne Bay (which can be visited by the public).


73 posted on 06/29/2008 6:11:38 AM PDT by FORTRUTHONLY (Easy as 3.14159265358979323846...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
[ "oxygen merged with helium" / Errrr... Did you mean, "hydrogen"? ]

Yes.. but could've been a Freudian slip?... LoL..
Water THATS FLOATS...

74 posted on 06/29/2008 7:04:01 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Humans have not created a space wherein they are immune from selective pressure.

I didn't say that human beings were "immune" to selective pressure. What I said is they are (evidently) capable of modifying the evolutionary space in which selection occurs (for good or ill). The higher social animals have not been observed to do this.

75 posted on 06/29/2008 9:02:59 AM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Many animals “modify the evolutionary space in which selection occurs” by their behaviors, culture, learning, etc. We are not unique in that regards. Moreover just because we more intelligently interact with our environment in no way means that the environment is not applying selective pressure. Indeed the intelligent way we interact with our environment leads to selective pressure all the time, such as putting ourselves inside a moving metal box going 60 mph with other sentient beings negotiating the same spaces at high speed. Which is what I am about to do.
76 posted on 06/29/2008 11:02:14 AM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Many animals “modify the evolutionary space in which selection occurs” by their behaviors, culture, learning, etc. We are not unique in that regards.

Just a question, allmendream. When you say animals have "culture," would you say they have "culture" in the sense in which human beings have "culture?"

Or has "culture" become some sort of "leveling" term, by which one might say: "Well both man and animals have culture; and thus there's no substantive difference between man and animals"?

77 posted on 06/30/2008 10:47:45 AM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Not at all. Animals capacity for culture is not nearly as much as with humans. By “culture” among animals I mean learned traits like washing food, fishing, utilizing non-conventional food sources, locations of water holes, and anything else that Social animals can learn or teach.

There is very substantive differences between Humans and other animals, the most critical being that we were given a soul by God. But Biology isn't something that separates us from other animals, the differences in our Biology is one of degree not one of kind. We are, after all, about 94% the same as a chimp over our entire genome and 98% the same as a chimp in our genetic DNA.

78 posted on 06/30/2008 10:53:22 AM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
...the differences in our Biology is one of degree not one of kind.

But it seems the differences in our cultural aptitudes are differences of kind, not of degree.

Are you suggesting that if chimps could share, not just 94 percent of "our" genome, or 98 percent of our genetic DNA, but 100% of both, then chimps and humans would be culturally as well as biologically indistinguishable from each other?

IOW, do you believe "culture" is a function of DNA?

79 posted on 06/30/2008 11:48:59 AM PDT by betty boop (This country was founded on religious principles. Without God, there is no America. -- Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Say what?

How could culture be the function of DNA? Culture is the language, customs, practices, religion, etc that are taught to someone. Two identical twins raised in separate environments would have different cultures despite having exactly the same DNA.

80 posted on 06/30/2008 11:55:33 AM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-725 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson