Posted on 08/17/2003 8:29:26 PM PDT by marktwain
Phoenix, Ariz. The results of a six-year study of Supreme Court gun cases will be released in September and has uncovered scores of forgotten decisions that affect the highly contested Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Co-written by an attorney who has won three cases before the High Court, along with the research director of a prominent think tank, and a nationally recognized gun-law expert, the researchers conclude from the evidence that the Supreme Court has recognized an individual right to arms for most of the past two centuries.
Among the key findings in "Supreme Court Gun Cases," being released next month by Phoenix-based Bloomfield Press:
- The Court has not been quiet on this subject as previously thought, using some form of the word "gun" in its decisions 2,910 times (gun, rifle, pistol, shotgun, firearm, etc., even Winchester five times) in 92 cases. Three dozen of the cases quote or mention the Second Amendment directly.
- Armed self defense with personally owned firearms is recognized and supported in more than a dozen cases, is a distinct right of American citizens, and an ancient "duty to retreat" is not obligatory.
- The often-cited Miller case from 1939 is inconclusive, which is why gun-rights and gun-control advocates both claim it supports their position. The record shows that the Court actually remanded this case back to the lower court for retrial and a hearing on the evidence, since there was no evidence presented. Because Miller had been murdered by that time and his co-defendant had taken a plea agreement, no retrial or evidentiary hearing was ever held.
- All 92 cases are reproduced to show what the Court has actually said. More than 1,000 interesting quotations are highlighted, and each case includes a plain-English description. A special "descriptive index" reduces each case to the firearms-related question(s) it answers.
Advanced review copies of "Supreme Court Gun Cases" are available to the news media on request. Contact Bloomfield Press at 1-800-707-4020 or SCGC@gunlaws.com.
---------------------
Note: Bloomfield Press publishes "Gun Laws of America," the unabridged guide to federal gun law, and is the largest publisher of gun-law books in the country, founded in 1988. Copies of "Supreme Court Gun Cases" for media review are free on request, call 1-800-707-4020. The authors (Attorney David Kopel, Attorney Stephen Halbrook, Alan Korwin) are available for interview, call us, or email interview@gunlaws.com. Download high-resolution mini-cover art and more info from our website, click Media Services.
John, I assume you're aware of this book, and want to ride it into the Supreme Court like John Wayne chasing the bad guy into a saloon on horseback.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Texans for Sale or Rent" posted on FR, other publication to come.
I'm sure the NYTimes will...they will just leave out all the cases which don't agree with their position.
You're right, my mistake.
The very FIRST thing I learned in Law School...AFTER: "You teach yourself the LAW, we teach you how to think like a LAWYER"...was something about how the US Supreme Court is the only institution on the planet which visibly demonstrates that change is bad. Showing these cases in a brief to the court is going to be a persuasive element as a reminder of earlier binding precedent. I begin to be cheered just a wee bit more...at least the outlook isn't quite as gloomy as before.
That should make for a VERY brief review of the book...
BTW, even the Wisconsin Supremes have found that the right to self-defense exists in the State (partially due to the hard work of the NRA and its people in Wisconsin.)
As a result of the decision, issued a couple of weeks ago, Wisconsin NOW has a 'right-to-carry-concealed' WITHOUT A PERMIT situation.
Thousands of innocent children have been butchered by wild-eyed gun-carrying white Christian family men...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.