Skip to comments.
NEW ZEALAND legalises prostitution
The Press [Christchurch, New Zealand] ^
| June 26 2002
Posted on 06/25/2003 1:16:35 PM PDT by shaggy eel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: shaggy eel
A thought: HAMAS translates as ZEAL.
A question: How does a hooker kick back and celebrate?
A forecast: The Islamists' Sharia will repeal this act, and stone to death those who voted for it among the fornicators, male and female. But killing the girls is the fun part of Islam.
41
posted on
06/25/2003 1:59:01 PM PDT
by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: Onelifetogive
true... to a point. There is no product in question when you purchase your lady friend dinner, or a BMW, if she wants to enjoy a special time with you, she can and will.
Purchasing a female body part for your use for a short period of time is not the same. In one you haven't bought her, you've bought her dinner. In the other, you've bought a few inches of her anatomy for temporary pleasure.
demeaning... yes.
42
posted on
06/25/2003 1:59:04 PM PDT
by
bedolido
(please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
To: shaggy eel
Didn't New Zealand just ban cow farts??
43
posted on
06/25/2003 1:59:11 PM PDT
by
EggsAckley
( "Aspire to Mediocracy"..........new motto for publik skools....)
To: adam_az
Maybe you should offer another $150? ;)If you had seen her, you would have thought $50 was high....
To: EggsAckley
Didn't New Zealand just ban cow farts??Methane expressing may be illegal. Bovine Methane is sometimes released during cow-tipping parties.
45
posted on
06/25/2003 2:01:14 PM PDT
by
bedolido
(please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
To: shaggy eel
Does this mean NZ will reinstate the Whore house of the South Pacific label it once had? Hehe.
46
posted on
06/25/2003 2:02:12 PM PDT
by
spitz
To: shaggy eel
I'm curious about this fellow Ashraf Choudhary. It's not really true that he "opposed the bill," as the article states, or he would have voted against it. Also, is he a Muslim, as this article says? I know several Chaudherys and Choudharys, and they are Indians of Sikh extraction. That doesn't necessarily mean that this one is, of course.
Did the Labour whip refuse to release party members to vote their consciences on this? It seems a very curious bill for the party to take that kind of approach to. Normally it's only done on really important bills, budgets and the like.
47
posted on
06/25/2003 2:04:21 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: bedolido
Purchasing a female body part for your use for a short period of time is not the same. Like the hands of a chiropractor. Can't allow that! My chiropractor can exchange dinner for an adjustment, but shouldn't do it for cash?
To: bedolido
In one you haven't bought her, you've bought her dinner. In the other, you've bought a few inches of her anatomy for temporary pleasure. No one buys prostitutes. If they did, they'd own them after the fact. / painfully obvious
One pays a prostitute for services in the same way they'd pay a message therapist or a chiropractor.
49
posted on
06/25/2003 2:04:22 PM PDT
by
freeeee
To: bedolido
Purchasing a female body part for your use for a short period of time is not the same. Like the hands of a chiropractor. Can't allow that! My chiropractor can exchange dinner for an adjustment, but shouldn't do it for cash?
To: freeeee; Hodar
And that differs from other jobs in what way.... ,,, none. Very few of us do what we actually want to do for a job. I'm not forced to do what I do for a job, but responsibilities and committments mean I'm stuck with it. If being on the streets is the only work some women can get easily, that's the scenario for them.
To: Onelifetogive
Sex is special and it should not be for sale.
>Should it be legal to give it away free!
>Is it too special even for that?
It is special because it is OK to do it from human, personal motives. That's what special means... not hard. You sound like a person who sends his wife to the streets every night... What's so special about that huh?
52
posted on
06/25/2003 2:06:02 PM PDT
by
singsong
To: freeeee; Onelifetogive
One pays a prostitute for services in the same way they'd pay a message therapist or a chiropractor.Keep lowering the bar until everyone steps over it. We will never agree on this. But thanks for your input.
53
posted on
06/25/2003 2:07:50 PM PDT
by
bedolido
(please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
To: freeeee
No one buys prostitutes. If they did, they'd own them after the fact. / painfully obvious And the upkeep would be prohibitively expensive. Much better to rent!
To: EggsAckley
Didn't New Zealand just ban cow farts??,,, yeah, but that can be repealed if farmers vote Labour in 2004.
To: spitz
Does this mean NZ will reinstate the Whore house of the South Pacific label it once had? Hehe.,,, you don't live in Russell, Bay of Islands do you?
To: singsong
It is special because it is OK to do it from human, personal motives.Paying one's bill's is not a "human, personal" motive??
You sound like a person who sends his wife to the streets every night...
That is a HORRIBLE thing to say. I would never send her to the streets. I take her to the streets. What kind of cad do you think I am?
To: Cicero
Did the Labour whip refuse to release party members to vote their consciences on this? It seems a very curious bill for the party to take that kind of approach to. Normally it's only done on really important bills, budgets and the like.
,,, you've got me there. Couldn't even guess. As for Ashraf Choudhary, he is our only Muslim MP. In abstaining, he gave them the count they needed. If he had voted against it, the Bill would have been dead in the water.
To: shaggy eel
INTREP
To: bedolido
Keep lowering the bar until everyone steps over it. Hmmm. 'lowering the bar'... I still think prostitution is demeaning and of low character. It's just that I get to make that determination, not the state. If the state says for example eating dog turds is legal, it doesn't make it a good idea, or moral. If we rely on government for moral guidance, we might decide that being married while getting oral sex from an intern at work is a good idea and moral. We need to use our own brains, our own moral institutions such as family and church to determine our morality, that's what we have them for.
We will never agree on this. But thanks for your input.
I love civility! Thanks.
60
posted on
06/25/2003 2:17:57 PM PDT
by
freeeee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson