To: JohnHuang2
Part of me suspects that her crime was, to paraphrase the movie "Network", disrupting the primal forces of nature. And for that she must atone. Somehow, effectively prosecuting someone for proclaiming their innocence seems to me to be an abuse of prosecutorial discretion.
3 posted on
06/06/2003 2:56:47 AM PDT by
garbanzo
(Free people will set the course of history)
To: garbanzo
BUT...............
"..if we can get HER for lying, then we can return to that sumbag, Clinton, and get him too!"
(No, wait... he's been given a pass..... Hum.... well..... I guess we'll just have to lean on MS harder, to assuage our conscious'.)
4 posted on
06/06/2003 4:28:14 AM PDT by
Elsie
(If the STATE giveth: the STATE can take away!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: garbanzo
Somehow, effectively prosecuting someone for proclaiming their innocence seems to me to be an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. It seems way over the line to me, too. In fact, it makes the whole case look dubious.
5 posted on
06/06/2003 4:44:15 AM PDT by
livius
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson