Why, I would be honored.
Posted on 12/02/2002 1:50:18 PM PST by Jean S
[CAPITALISM MAGAZINE.COM]
Given the unequivocal rout in the Nov. 5 election, there's been no shortage of friendly advice on how the Democratic Party can resuscitate itself.
From Sen. Zell Miller, a Georgia Democrat, looking at the prospect that Rep. Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco will become the new public face of the Democratic Party in the House of Representatives: "We've got the left turn signal on, and we're headed down another rabbit hole to political oblivion."
From Harold Ford Jr., a Democratic representative from Tennessee, arguing his case on why he should be Minority Leader in the House: "Last Tuesday, for the fifth election in a row, Democrats failed to win a majority in Congress." Ford made clear how he would lead the Democratic Party out of the wilderness. To stimulate the economy, he'd speed up the Bush tax cuts: "We would shift the tax cuts that do not take effect for several years into immediate tax relief for all Americans and businesses." On Osama and Iraq: "We now live in a post-9/11 world. If we want the American people to trust us to govern, we cannot take a dismissive or defeatist attitude toward issues of national security."
And from Joe Klein, a staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of The Natural: The Misunderstood Presidency of Bill Clinton: "The Democrats have to stop being so goddamned negative and pessimistic. No piece about the party should omit Dick Gephardt's famous retort to Ronald Reagan's 'Morning in America' ads: 'It's getting closer and closer to midnight.' (For that reason alone, Gephardt should be barred from further national political activity.) Why are Democrats always so downbeat and mopey about the most dynamic economy in the history of the world?"
As so, the big question: "On the mat looking up," as Peggy Noonan put it in The Wall Street Journal, which way does the Democratic Party go? More centrist? More mainstream? Stop acting like Bush is more dangerous than Saddam, recognize that bigger government and higher taxes aren't the ticket to a better tomorrow, acknowledge that Al Gore is a loser? Or does the party, in a country that's trending Right, go more Left? Does it go, as Sen. Zell Miller warns, "down another rabbit hole to political oblivion"?
Entering stage far-left, super-liberal Rep. Nancy Pelosi as Minority Leader in the House looks like the perfect choice to take the party down the rabbit hole at record speeds.
On the question of how much the government should grab out of our wallets, Pelosi voted against the Bush tax cut, voted in favor of the Clinton tax hikes, opposes any reduction in the marriage penalty, opposes the idea of allowing workers to invest all or part of their payroll taxes in stocks or bonds through personal retirement accounts, and opposes the repeal of the death tax.
On Iraq, Pelosi voted against the 1991 Gulf War and voted against authorizing the use of force against Iraq this year. In contrast, she's pushing for more gun control laws. Our Smith & Wesson pistols, it seems, cause Ms. Pelosi more nightmares than Saddam's super-sized vats of anthrax and aflatoxin.
When it comes to individual liberty versus dependency, Pelosi is opposed to school choice of any kind, even for poor kids in failing urban schools, against free trade, and against any expansion in medical savings accounts, IRA-like savings accounts that individuals can use to pay for medical care.
With welfare, Pelosi voted against the welfare-reform bill that Bill Clinton signed into law in 1996. Four years later, the number of people on welfare had decreased by more than 50 percent.
Last year, Pelosi's votes in Congress earned her a rating of 100 percent from Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), not exactly the type of outfit with positions that are likely to help the Democrats undo their downhill slide.
In foreign affairs, for instance, ADA says we should "end the trade embargo on Cuba," cancel the debts owed by "heavily indebted poor countries," and lay off Iraq: "An attack is certain to cause increased alienation of Arab and Muslim states to the United States."
On the domestic front, ADA is against drilling for oil in ANWAR (the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), against the deployment of a U.S. missile defense system, and against getting too tough with welfare recipients: "All coercion to establish a heterosexual marriage should be eliminated."
Plus there's this complaint from ADA about welfare reform: "Before welfare changes were enacted, beneficiaries --- mostly women --- were 13 percent more likely to attend college than poor women in general."
In addition, says ADA, the clock should be stopped on the five-year lifetime limit for receiving benefits if a welfare recipient has a problem with drug dependency. Do crack, in short, and get free money for more years.
And just to keep elections on the up-and-up, ADA "strongly supports federal legislation abolishing felony disenfranchisement laws nationwide." All told, reports ADA, "4.2 million felons and ex-felons are stripped of the vote today in the United States, constituting a full 2.1 percent of the American voting-age population." In a close election, that's a lot of Democrats.
About the Author: Ralph R. Reiland is the B. Kenneth Simon professor of free enterprise at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh.
Why, I would be honored.
"...got the left turn signal on, and...headed down another rabbit hole to political oblivion."Sounds more like Cassandra than Zell. I hope it is. Nobody believes Cassandra.
What with its commitment to treason, murdering third trimester babies, and corrupt lawyers...I would imagine straight to hell.
GRRRRRRollin'
 |
It's odd, but "Hell" was the first response that popped into my head... |
The Democrats are in effect the mirror image of where the Republicans were in 1950. The Democrats back then had all the issues. On foreign polity the Democrats had invented containment in a nuclear world. To offer a choice the Republicans could propose surrender or world war three. The Democrats today are in a similar quandary. The Democrats can propose do nothing about terrorism or go to war to fight a billion Muslims.
On the Domestic front the Democrats can propose doing nothing about the economy or propose raising taxes.. Bush has economic stimulus staked out and a sensible war on terror.
The Republicans solved that dilemma in 1952 by nominating a popular war hero who ran on the program of people saying "I Like IKE." The problem for the Democrats this time is they don't have an heroic popular war hero nice guy to run. They have Gore, Kerry or Edwards...did I mention Gephardt? The Democrats don't have an issue or a candidate. They are toast... until the Republicans screw up.
Jimmy Carter in 1976 had a chance to line up all the wining issues for the Democrats. Jimmah chose wrong on both the economy and the Iran hostages. That as much as anything gave issues to Reagan.
I think Kerry, Edwards and perhaps a few others are positioning themselves for 2008. But if Bush holds the center right and remembers how it is done, he can win and make a lot of progress one little step at a time. If he does we can hold all of government until at least 2012.
If a President moves the laws to the right without moving the voters first, the voters will elect someone to undo whatever he just did.
The party that stakes out the majority public opinion is just unbeatable.
When the public has a party and a president it agrees with it is next to impossible for the opposition party to win. They have to change the publics mind about a party, president and policies about which they all three agree.
Kerry was talking about having a better way on terrorism and the economy. He thinks the task is confined to convincing the pubic that Bush is wrong and he is right. But that is not his problem. People agree with bush. They hold the same opinions he does. Kerry must tell the American people the they are wrong and he is right. No one has ever accomplished that... or even come close.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.