Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Era of Big Government Has Just Begun
TechCentralStation.com ^ | 09/23/2002 | James Pinkerton

Posted on 09/23/2002 7:18:00 PM PDT by billybudd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-247 next last
To: Chancellor Palpatine
You don't see propaganda when you see it, do you? You'd probably willfully give up your God-given American rights for "security"? Check out Missileboy's comment. Furthermore, give a rebuttal for the pro-UN arguments that Bush has made. If he's against the UN, why would he make such statements?
61 posted on 09/23/2002 9:24:23 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Are you sure that you're not the liberal? You're the one who seems not to care about the loss of rights, the trashing of the U.S. Constitution, and the promotion of the UN via President Bush.
62 posted on 09/23/2002 9:25:31 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
I'm sorry - I'm still trying to figure out how you're going to safeguard the lives and property of American citizens based on the goofy definitions you are applying to the Constitution.

Give us an answer, boy. Tell us what you would do if you were responsible.

63 posted on 09/23/2002 9:28:50 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I want to understand the way you and your buddies think. I really do. You say that you're a conservative, but any liberal legislation supported and promoted by the Bush administration doesn't seem to phase you. The obvious trashing of the Constitution and Bill of Rights via the Patriot act doesn't even phase you. What about CFR? What about "Homeland Security" that sets a dangerous precedent of which to carry out the Patriot Act against those Christian, Constitutional, NRA "terrorists"? What about wide-open borders, and Bush referring to the Mexican border as the New Frontier. What about Bush's promotion of the UN (even in this article), the environmentalist agenda, the EU, as well as support for an illegal alien amnesty. What about the massive increases in the federal budget? What about Bush wanting a War resolution that will give him complete autonomy of the War effort without Congress? What about the Separation of Powers. Aren't they important?

What is it going to take. I really don't get it.

64 posted on 09/23/2002 9:30:26 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
He would recite the Preamble as Osama wiped us out
65 posted on 09/23/2002 9:31:03 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Vidalia
You seem to like and enjoy big powerfull government. I hope you are in a position to enjoy some protection from the big governments power.
If by chance you are a misguided citizen of the United States, I ask you to think about the Colorado National Guard soldiers that are being accused of shipping Illegal weapons into the United States. If the National Guard is not covered under the 2nd Ammendment as being the Militia. What are you?
I vote Libertarian.
66 posted on 09/23/2002 9:32:19 PM PDT by earplug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
To be honest, I see more propaganda and fear tactics than anything.
67 posted on 09/23/2002 9:33:58 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Art Five

68 posted on 09/23/2002 9:38:15 PM PDT by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
Hop on a plane, fly to New York and look at the propaganda and fear tactics down around the battery. Then fly to DC and look at the propaganda and fear tactics at the Pentagon. You're the moron who, just a few days ago, stated your belief that the Administration may have been responsible for the attacks on 9/11.

Now tell me - who is using propaganda and fear tactics, eh?

69 posted on 09/23/2002 9:39:50 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
"I really don't get it"

You never will, You shroud yourself in your self proclaimed knowledge of the Constitution as if it was a suicide pact for all conservatives. What the mentally challenged bottom dwelleres like yourself will never figure out is...... How to win an election and take back the country the same way we lost it..... SLOWLY.

The major problem with you and the other narrow minded constipated libertarians around here is you will NEVER GET IT. You and your Special Olympic equalevant scholars of the Constitution expect this president to ignore popular opinion and strickly follow the very same agenda that your candidate couldn't get 1% of the population to vote for. And you wonder why the majority of FReepers here think you have your haed and your @ss wired together?

Get a life

70 posted on 09/23/2002 9:43:26 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Waco, Ruby Ridge
71 posted on 09/23/2002 9:43:42 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
For everyone's benefit, I'll repeat this again:

I'm sorry - I'm still trying to figure out how you're going to safeguard the lives and property of American citizens based on the goofy definitions you are applying to the Constitution.

Give us an answer, boy. Tell us what you would do if you were responsible.

72 posted on 09/23/2002 9:45:05 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Answer the questions. Is that acceptable?

By the way, I'm not a Libertarian, for I'm not for drug legalization, wide-open borders (that some advocate), and "free trade"

73 posted on 09/23/2002 9:45:56 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
I would uphold the US Constitution. I would not sacrifice liberties for "security". Anyone who sacrifices liberty for "security" deserves neither liberty nor security.
74 posted on 09/23/2002 9:47:02 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: earplug

75 posted on 09/23/2002 9:47:53 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
I know what you are, Your posting history speaks volumes of your ignorance. I wouldn't be suprised if you don't have one of those Colonial Wigs on while you post your mindless drivel
76 posted on 09/23/2002 9:48:04 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
Jim Pinkerton is a pseudo conservative who picks and chooses the midrange.

If he ever retained the mental or physical gonads to speak with the real residents of the country and maybe a few hundred of those who have chosen to put their asses on the line for life and death in the military, then maybe little Jimmy would change his tune, and it would be obvious on the only outlet he sits on, thanks to Fox News.

Pinkerton's fear of the exponential growth of the worthless bureaucracy is about 9 years late.

On a problem with bastards attempting to kill you and me, whether in bunches or individually, GW Bush is attempting to put together a sourced and reliable group that is competent from the core and can be trusted.

The bullshit leaker(s) from those outside of his core planners have already showed their hands.

That should be plenty of concern for you and Jim Pinkerton.

Lunatics, hiding behind an old and sometimes ambiguous religion are trying to kill you, your family and anyone in your vicinity, where ever you may live, from Florida to Oregon, from El Paso to all points Maine.

Get it through your head that after over 30 years...

They are here to kill you, and if you have to ask who "they "are, then you are either illiterate, naive, ignorant or "one of 'em".

If Jim Pinkerton was ever introduced to the "Mare of Steel", he would have to be thrown onto it, since he shows he has "nothing to lose", much like Trent Lott, and the other cheerleaders of nothingness.
77 posted on 09/23/2002 9:48:16 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; Sir Gawain
BEST ONE YET!
78 posted on 09/23/2002 9:48:36 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; Sir Gawain
BEST ONE YET!
79 posted on 09/23/2002 9:49:04 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger; biffalobull; 2Trievers
ping
80 posted on 09/23/2002 9:53:50 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson