Posted on 09/08/2002 3:57:49 AM PDT by logic101.net
We probably all do that.
It's time for me to get off this and go try to do some constructive things around the house.
Thank you for the exchange.
It's illegal for cops to strike, so instead they get "blue flu". It was illegal for the air traffic controllers to strike. They did anyway, so Reagan fired all the strikers.
What would be more effective would be to make firing mandatory for striking government employees
What would be most effective would be to make it illegal for a governmental employer to withhold union dues. If the unions had to collect dues from each member, they would be much less powerful
MARK A SITY
MARK A SITY
MARK A SITY
Uh!...does that include the Gov't Workers Union that runs Washington ?.. If so, The Matrix(the movie) was'nt fiction but a allegorical documentary on the guys, behind the gals, behind the guys, behind the gays, behind the guys. I still laugh when considering that Al Gore and G.Bush was the best the U.S. could come up with as Presidential candidates...
A certified moron and a guy that looks almost exactly like Alfred E. Neuman(MaddMag). I thought then and think today that somebody somewhere is laughing at (us) the American voter.. and the near TIE between Bush/Gore... was just a little too convienent to me... voting machine fraud jumps to mind.. Geees, Dale these people are making me paraoid.... What people!.......
I dunno.... nevermind...
Uses
People
Severely
At over $20/hr they should be grateful to their employer! I know I am!
MARK A SITY
Poor management practices generate their own opposition as labor organizes to provide a system of checks and balances. Neither corporations nor unions are inherently "good" nor "evil". They merely exist as artificial entities representing the interests of their members/shareholders. Abusive misuse of the power that accompanies this representation exists on both sides of the issue.
Don't brag.
HistoryThe history of the Freightliner brand begins in 1929. That was the year that Leland James, a young trucker from Portland, Oregon, opened his own freight hauling company. It didn't take long for James and his Consolidated Freight Lines to prosper. James worked hard and was always on the lookout for new ways to boost business and increase profits. Trouble was, truck manufacturers of the day didn't share his enthusiasm for innovation. When James asked for lighter trucks that could carry more payload and stay within the 60-foot length in many western states, his suppliers ignored him.
So James adapted and began customizing stock trucks to fit his requirements.
I think any raise for public workers, at any level, should be put on the ballot and let the voters decide if they want to pay more. Heh of course that would take the power from the unions, which, IMO should'nt be in civil service to begin with since they are taxpayer funded.
MARK A SITY
Anyway, these two were milk haulers in the begining of the Great Depression. When the bubble burst, they weren't making any money hauling milk one way, and going home empty. They started taking back-loads of freight. It turned out that this was more profitable than hauling milk and eventually dropped the milk.
This was one of the very few sucessful businesses started in the depression. This is one of the reasons I am so sorry to see CF go. This post was in large part a tribute to it. I had a feeling one of the big union LTL companies was going to go under; but I was hoping for Overnight. I just don't like that company. Maybe that is because one of their drivers took off my side mirror while I was broken down trying to change an alternator belt on the side of the highway? Nahh! Couldn't have anything to do with that, could it?
MARK A SITY
They would not be, if the conservative view recognized that, the
working man is not the enemy. The working man it the consumer
no consumer, no need for products.
However, your proposal is not without some risk; work slow-downs and "blue flu"; etc. But then again; most of these guys, how much slower could they work? And as for the "blue flu", well; if we were allowed to defend ourselves that would not be a crisis!
MARK A SITY
The true enemy of the working man is the liberals. Why do so many families need 2 incomes? Is it because of greedy corporations? Nope, because of greedy politicians trying to buy votes! Before the "Welfare State" existed usually only one income was needed. Tax rates were low on workers. Also, before the welfare state families were strong, especially black families. Since the introduction of the left's agenda 2 parent black families are almost a rarity. Few families can afford to have the mother stay home and take care of the kids. Children are raised by unrelated 3rd parties.
Do I really need to go on here?
MARK A SITY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.