Posted on 09/01/2002 6:01:01 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow
I fail to see why he considers her more of a "hater" for what she says about conservatives than Molly Ivins or Deb McMurtrie (local columnist) say about the left. StopGlobalWhining had posted a Deb McMurtrie column awhile back about how conservatives don't care about starving children etc. Why didn't Unger consider that hating??? Only because they didn't name examples and painted all conservatives as meanspirited?
The funny thing about this is these liberals act like THEY are civilized.
Paper publications are becoming increasingly meaningless. No one who wants to read Coulter will be denied.
Disagree.
Editor means 'dictator' to Socialists.
Destroy Liberalism wherever you find it - every thing you do helps.
How this so-called editor comes to the decision to pull Ann Coulter's column yet continues to run Molly Ivans, is beyond me.
Actually, you have a point. LOL! Missed that. He can't fire her, he can only stop purchasing her product.
A liberal Canadian!
Your two cents is worthless.
Because calling conservatives "haters" is a conscious lie. Unger uses words to further the cause, and regards "truth" and "lie" as specious bourgeois categories, too base and concrete to capture the lofty thoughts that occur to the revolutionary vanguard.
You cannot debate with these people, it will drive you insane ( I mean really, literally psychotic.)
Nice job of equating Ms. Coulter to the 9/11 terrorists.
Given the fact that this came from a town where a University exists, this "firing" should surprise no one.
This guy is trying to start a propaganda campaign against Coulter in the hope that others will follow and kill her column. The liberals understand that they control the editorial rooms. However, Coulter as a personality has hit a critical mass beyond which she can't be muzzled.
What is doubly amusing is the hypocrisy herein. Liberals have been peddling hatred of conservatives, Republicans, and in the case of black liberals, white Conservatives, for at least a decade and a half. The fact is that this is a liberal editor who is upset that Coulter so thoroughly gores his side's oxen. That is all. His accusations of "hatred" are merely his rationalizations for censorship.
That is all that there is to this column. A neat and tidy moral corruption is clothed by a tawdry wardrobe of wounded self-righteousness.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
And the problem here is .... ?
Like he really has to worry about his sales numbers...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.