Skip to comments.
Skeletal Remains May Be 11,000 Years Old (Lake Jackson, Texas)
Houston Chronicle ^
| 8-9-2002
| Terry Kliewer
Posted on 08/09/2002 11:17:39 AM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: blam
Yes, and Kennewick Man was apparently a Caucasian. Bad news for the multicultural nazis on the Left, it seems.
He didn't last long and was erased from American history (that is, he was given a proper Indian burial).
To: Reactionary
"He didn't last long and was erased from American history (that is, he was given a proper Indian burial)." Nope. He is not buried yet, still in the courts. (The site where he was found was completely destroyed by the Corps Of Engineers on orders from 'higher ups' in the Clinton Administration.)
22
posted on
08/09/2002 12:09:11 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
I thought that they had decided to hand him over to an Indian tribe. My error.
To: Reactionary
"I thought that they had decided to hand him over to an Indian tribe. My error." When the Smithsonian Institute joined the fray on the side of the scientists who want further testing, the tone/politics changed dramatically.
24
posted on
08/09/2002 12:18:39 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Far Right Of Left
LOL!
By the way, does anyone doubt that the tree huggers and other urban sprawl riff raff will be out in force to claim that there should be no construction within a thousand square miles of the dig.
25
posted on
08/09/2002 12:22:29 PM PDT
by
wildbill
To: blam
Captain Picard!!
To: blam
This is a 3 year old discovery and we get to hear about it now, thanks to the federal bureaucracy. I wonder when we'll get to see a clay re-creation of the Lake Jackson girl?
To: austingirl
"This is a 3 year old discovery and we get to hear about it now, thanks to the federal bureaucracy. I wonder when we'll get to see a clay re-creation of the Lake Jackson girl?" Girl?
28
posted on
08/09/2002 2:22:46 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
D'Aigle said experts who examined the remains believe they are from an adolescent female who was about 4 feet tallGirl.
To: blam
Thanks for another informative article.
To: petuniasevan
"D'Aigle said experts who examined the remains believe they are from an adolescent female who was about 4 feet tall" Thanks. LOL. How could I have missed that. (could I blame this on old age?)
31
posted on
08/09/2002 3:20:23 PM PDT
by
blam
To: JudyB1938; ruoflaw; #3Fan; d4now
FYI.
32
posted on
08/09/2002 3:22:54 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam; MeeknMing; Dog Gone
MeeknMing can prolly give you a Texas Freeper ping.....
33
posted on
08/09/2002 3:30:40 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport; blam; Squantos; GeronL; Billie; Slyfox; San Jacinto; SpookBrat; FITZ; COB1; DainBramage; ...
Skeletal Remains May Be 11,000 Years Old
(Lake Jackson, Texas) Excerpt:
D'Aigle sent an ear bone and a sample of soil from within the skull to the Stafford Research Laboratories for analysis. Stafford said that, while his own radiocarbon testing was inconclusive, other signs, such as the soil in which the bones were found, point to the remains being at least 11,000 years old.
Stafford also said the importance of d'Aigle's find is not necessarily that it is the oldest human skeleton on the continent, but that it is one of so very few.
As such, he termed it "a pretty incredible discovery" on par with two other 10,000- to 11,000-year-old specimens, one from Montana and the other from California.
"Our population of prehistoric skeletons is pretty small."
Besides, he said, the University of Arizona has a "spectacular" lab and is capable of reliable radiocarbon testing. However, he too said more testing by other labs is needed to determine the age of the remains.
As for the discovery's importance, he said, "I'd give a very enthusiastic but qualified 'yes.'
"I think we're in the right ballpark for age. I think it really may be what Bob (d'Aigle) thinks it is."
If there are any Anthropology/Scientific/Technical types that have expertise here please comment? Thanks....
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas ping list!. . .don't be shy.
No, you don't HAVE to be a Texan to get on this list!
To: MeeknMing; crystalk
"Our population of prehistoric skeletons is pretty small." Yes. I have named most of the 8,000+ year old on this thread already. There is one skeleton found on an island off the coast of California that (I've read) is expected to exceed the 10,500 year old Luzia date. That was before this announcement. There are a number of human sites (artifacts) that are pushing the 20,000 year old date. (This excludes the controversial 200,000 year old Calico site in California)
35
posted on
08/09/2002 5:30:09 PM PDT
by
blam
To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the ping. Don't the Mormons believe that there was a caucasian tribe in America a long time ago?
To: MeeknMing
37
posted on
08/09/2002 5:35:18 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
The scary thing is that the skeleton is still a registered, voting Democrat.
To: advocate10; BossyRoofer; brigette; byu-fan; CaliforniaOkie; crystalk; CubicleGuy; Dan(9698); ...
The find comes as scientists are rethinking the long-held theory that North and South America were populated by prehistoric tribes that crossed from Asia via a Bering Strait land bridge. Even those who don't question the migration aren't sure about its timing.
***JAREDITE PING!!!!***
39
posted on
08/09/2002 5:38:24 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: BJClinton
40
posted on
08/09/2002 5:38:43 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson