Skip to comments.
Mysterious Shift in Earth's Gravity Suggests Equator is Bulging
space.com ^
| 1 Aug 02
| Robert Roy Britt
Posted on 08/01/2002 3:13:16 PM PDT by RightWhale
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
The oceans are rising near the equator and some of the islanders blame the industrialized West. But maybe their case is weakening as the earth gets less round.
To: RightWhale
Mysterious Shift in Earth's Gravity Suggests Equator is Bulging Heck, my midsection is bulging as well, but I can only blame it on beer, not cosmic changes...
2
posted on
08/01/2002 3:15:25 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
Earth changes are coming.
To: RightWhale
It's from all the fat people.
4
posted on
08/01/2002 3:17:31 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: RightWhale
On a more practical note, I'm wondering what the net effect is on gravity models.
Some space missions won't care much, but others such as GPS, and various black- and white-world earth observation missions, will probably care whole a lot.
5
posted on
08/01/2002 3:17:31 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: RightWhale
"The result is it looks as if post-glacial rebound has reversed itself. But, we do not have any reason to think that post-glacial rebound has in any way stopped or changed." Hell no. We can't possibly challenge the religion of global warming.
6
posted on
08/01/2002 3:19:05 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: RightWhale
I bet Algore or some other enviromentalist wacko comes out in a few days and attributes this to global warming caused by mean and evil humans.
7
posted on
08/01/2002 3:21:24 PM PDT
by
twntaipan
To: RightWhale
Isostatic resonance?
8
posted on
08/01/2002 3:21:46 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: r9etb
As far as GPS is concerned, they have picked a limited selection of spheroids and insist you use them. Some spheroids, they claim, are closer to the actual shape of the earth than the one you were using, which means you have to adjust their data to match your maps. Earth is very lumpy and the gravity field also, but if it is changing all the time in new ways, we have a lot of remodelling work ahead.
To: RightWhale
The polar weightloss due to glacial melting has been offset by the gradual move away from the equator of Hillary Clinton.
10
posted on
08/01/2002 3:21:57 PM PDT
by
dead
To: RightWhale
I'm not knocking you or the article, but I do get amused when scientist release findings like these. It is interesting but all too often the perception of a need to extrapolate meaning from the data, means that we'll be hearing some hair-brained sky is falling tripe within the next few months. Either this will be tied to El Nino, La Nina, global warming, emissions or some new phenom that portends dire problems for the children. Can't we all just enjoy the data and "Get along"?
To: dirtboy
all "outies" are gradually turning to "innies".
To: RightWhale
The more I think about it, the more interesting it gets.
There hasn't been a leap second for four years, and none scheduled for December, either. That's more than twice as long as any other gap (they can be applied as often as every 6 months).
This phenomenon probably explains some of it. (As it likely explains the sudden flurry of symposia being held by the Earth Rotation and "fluid loading" geeks.)
13
posted on
08/01/2002 3:25:33 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: RightWhale
We know what this means, a whole new theory industry will rise that will attribute all the world's problems to the fact it's flattening out. Scientists will now have something new to sit around and pontificate about for decades.
And of course, you know they'll find a way to blame it all on the US.
To: mewzilla
Well, all that water runoff from global warming melting the arctic is flowing underground and collecting at the equator ;)
To: dirtboy
To: RightWhale
Just like Wilhelm the Fornicator and Ted Kennedy, the earth is getting rounder.
To: DoughtyOne
Not that they won't try, but I really think the enviro idiots are going to have a hard time blaming the reshaping of the globe's magnetic fields on man's burning of fossil fuels.
I mean the science editors at the NY Times will buy it, but not most thinking people.
18
posted on
08/01/2002 3:27:56 PM PDT
by
dead
To: dirtboy
On second thought, maybe this one is better. Resembles Gore, doesnt it?
To: dead
One plus for those who live in high latitudes, is that targeting of GPS guided bombs is very precise, but not at all accurate. They will miss your bunker by 420.04 feet. Those who are typing in coordinates for Saddam's cubicle are probably going slowly mad with the constant and variable shifts in random directions as the earth's gravity field meanders.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson