Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Conservative - Libertarian Schism: Freedom and Confidence
FreeRepublic ^ | July 31, 2002 | Francis W. Porretto

Posted on 07/31/2002 5:20:31 AM PDT by fporretto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-479 next last
To: tpaine
I've never given the man a kind word. - Nor he, me.

Hell Tpaine I doubt you ever gave your own mother a kind word.

441 posted on 08/04/2002 8:28:09 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
What a demetedly roscoe-arian statement.
442 posted on 08/04/2002 8:28:16 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

Comment #443 Removed by Moderator

To: tpaine
And your only agenda here at FR is creating a disruption. -You're a very weird fella.

Irony thy face is Tpaine. LOL

444 posted on 08/04/2002 8:40:54 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
You are a LIAR ! This is NOT an " opinion "; but, a staement of fact.

I am NOT a " RINO ". I am also NOT a " neocon "; which you have called me in the past. I am NOT a CINO ( Conservative in name only ); however, YOU are.

As to Jim 's new group,which you now keep touting : 1) it has NO name recognition, outside of this forum and not all that much here ! 2) it has absolutely NO track record ( because it's new ), so claiming any sort of power for it, is absurd . 3) since Jim Robinso has repeatedly come onto this , his very own forum, and claimed that he is supporting President Bush, as well as other GOP candidayes and is working to insure that the president has the majority in both Houses, one can infer , from these statements, of his, as well as from many others, that the constant Bushbashing and the continually nasty trashing of " regular " GOP supporters, by the fringers, are things which you are now purposefully leaving out of the equation., because it doesn't suit your agenda.

The rest of your juvenile and delusional little tirade, is beneath contempt, spurious libel, and doesn't deserve to be answered. So, why did I ? Because lurkers, who don't know any better, need to be told the truth. As for you ? You deserve to be ignored; nothing more. :-)

445 posted on 08/04/2002 11:34:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
As to Jim 's new group,which you now keep touting :
1) it has NO name recognition, outside of this forum and not all that much here !

Exactly. It needs more exposure, thats why I'm 'touting' it. - You're helping here, - so thanks!

2) it has absolutely NO track record ( because it's new ), so claiming any sort of power for it, is absurd.

Wrong. -- The RLC has been part of the Republican Party for 10 years or so, maybe more. In any case, who claimed power? - You're just being absurd.

3) since Jim Robinson has repeatedly come onto this , his very own forum, and claimed that he is supporting President Bush, as well as other GOP candidayes and is working to insure that the president has the majority in both Houses, one can infer , from these statements, of his, as well as from many others, that the constant Bushbashing and the continually nasty trashing of " regular " GOP supporters, by the fringers, are things which you are now purposefully leaving out of the equation., because it doesn't suit your agenda.

My 'agenda' is getting government to obey the constitution. -- The RLC could help that happen. -- Your tired old 'politics as usual' stance is STOPPING that from happening, imo. -- I suspect JR may be coming around to that type of conclusion himself, thus, his support of the RLC and a new forum. You don't like it? -- Tell it to JR.

446 posted on 08/05/2002 8:37:58 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

Comment #447 Removed by Moderator

Comment #448 Removed by Moderator

To: Scorpio
Free Republic is a place for people to discuss our common goals regarding the restoration of our constitutionally limited republican form of government. If people have other agendas for FR, I really wish they would take them elsewhere.
Thanks, Jim
226 posted on 2/7/02 4:01 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson


My 'agenda' is getting government to obey the constitution - tpaine


That is like a preacher trying to get Christians to obey the Bible. How well does that work? Not well.
The politicians will listen to whomever has the most money.
Reason has nothing to do with it.

Oh, and next time you may want to capitalize the Constitution. It is a proper noun


You don't like the agenda here?
- Tell JR.

And please, --- save your pontification about capitalization for a brother pedant who cares.
449 posted on 08/05/2002 11:28:39 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The federal government began taxing the output of whiskey stills within the boundaries of individual states when George Washington was president. Deliberate ignorance of history is a necessary prerequisite for the Libertarian faith.

The federal government routinely violates the 2nd amendment which says that the government cannot regulate private firearm ownership (obviously doesn't apply to people in jail/prison). The federal government routinely violates the first amendment with its passage of copyright legislation that restricts academic publishing rights (even though the first amendment, having been passed after the copyright clause is supreme over the IP clause in the Constitution). Get real, the US Government routinely violates the Constitution. That doesn't mean that it is acceptable.

450 posted on 08/05/2002 5:23:53 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
The federal government began Constitutionally taxing the output of whiskey stills within the boundaries of individual states when George Washington was president. Deliberate ignorance of history is a necessary prerequisite for the Libertarian faith.
451 posted on 08/06/2002 1:07:43 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I guess that some people just never learned about " THE WHISKEY REBELLION ", in school, so it doesn't exist , as historical fact, to them. Those, who went to school in Pa., had to learn about that, as high school freshmen; whether they attended public, parochial, or ;private school. It was required, by law, to be taught. I can also attest to the fact, that it used to be taught in college American History classes in other states. Oh well, dumbed down education has been around for a while, and perhaps that is no longer required to be taught.
452 posted on 08/06/2002 1:22:24 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I guess that some people just never learned about " THE WHISKEY REBELLION ", in school, so it doesn't exist , as historical fact, to them.

Willful ignorance is the bread and butter of Libertarianism.

453 posted on 08/06/2002 1:27:18 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Satadru
"For starters, Paul couldn't get elected as a Libertarian, so he masquerades as a Republican. He sometimes votes with the Liberal Dems and against Conservative positions. There's far too long a list and this is a boring / not on topic dodge, so, just go do some real research, on this matter."
Source


TOP "TEN" CONSERVATIVE LIST based on 2001 Conservative Index scores published in The New American magazine:

US House
1. Rep. Tancredo (R-CO) 95%
2. Rep. Paul (R-TX) (former Libertarian) 92%
3. Rep. Schaefer (R-CO) 90%
4. Rep. Hostettler (R-IN) 88%
5. Rep. Royce (R-CA) 84%
6. Rep. Rohrbacher (R-CA) 83%
7. Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-WI) 81%
8. Rep. Duncan (R-TN) 79%
9. Rep. Barr (R-GA) Rep. Goode (R-VA) (former Democrat) Rep. Pombo (R-CA) all tied for 9th place with a 78% conservative rating.

US Senate

1. Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) 74%
2. Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) 72%
3. Sen. Robert Smith (R-NH), Sen. James Inhofe & Sen Voinovich (R-OH) 70%
4. Sen. Strom Thurmond 69% (former Democrat)
5. Sen Phil Gramm (R-TX), Sen. Campbell (R-CO) (both former Democrats) & Sen. Frank Murkowski at 67%
6. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) & Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT) at 65%


To provide context, as a general rule conservatives are anyone that has a Conservative Index score around 65% or better. Moderate conservatives fall into the 50-65% range, moderates in the 40s and liberals in the 30s and below so the listing of conservative Senators above is fairly comprehensive while the more numerous House of Reps scores above omits many good conservatives of which there tend to be around 35-40, in this case all of whom are probably Republicans.

Ron Paul almost always scores as the top conservative followed by Dana Rohrabacher and Bob Barr in the House. In the Senate, Bob Smith (a personal hero of mine) usually scores as the top conservative and Don Nickles who is running against Trent Lott for Senate Minority Leader usually scores in the top ten. The Senate conservative numbers were unusually low presumably due to the fact that the GOP supported more liberal "bipartisan" legislation than normal. The other surprising thing is the fact that Rep. Tancredo (R-CO) scored #1 conservative in the house besting even traditional conservative champion, Ron Paul. If I am correct in assuming that this is the same Rep. Tancredo that has been leading the charge against Bush on Bush's indefensible support of open-borders immigration, then we have got a new veritable conservative hero/icon on our hands in the House of Reps!!

39 posted on 4/26/02 2:30 PM Pacific by rightwing2
SOURCE

HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?

454 posted on 08/06/2002 1:30:30 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
The New American magazine

Bircher bunk.

455 posted on 08/06/2002 1:33:00 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
More name calling. Nothing more.
456 posted on 08/06/2002 1:39:16 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Yes, the examples of that , here, are legion.
457 posted on 08/06/2002 1:40:58 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Boy is it HOT in here...
458 posted on 08/06/2002 1:42:40 AM PDT by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
If The New American magazine published an Extremist Crank Index it would be more plausible.
459 posted on 08/06/2002 1:46:40 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
More name calling.
460 posted on 08/06/2002 1:47:45 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-479 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson