Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mulder
Ridge did not say "domestic law enforcement". He said "the power to arrest" which in a domestic terrorist situation is very appropriate.
58 posted on 07/21/2002 10:54:14 AM PDT by NetValue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: NetValue
Ridge did not say "domestic law enforcement". He said "the power to arrest" which in a domestic terrorist situation is very appropriate.

I don't want them to have the "power to arrest" then. (Anyway, what is "domestic law enforcement" if it isn't the "power to arrest"? I don't see the difference).

Also, do you realize who the feds consider to be a "domestic terrorist"? I'll give you a hint-- it's not some murderous goblin from Iraq.

The "power to arrest" isn't going to do anything to stop foreign terrorists here. What we need is "power to stop", i.e., the recognition of the government that Free Americans have the Right to bear arms to defend ourselves.

If the government is truly interested in "stopping the terrorists", then enact a nationwide CCW law that protects the Rights of Free men and women to bear arms against any force that would do them harm.

But they aren't interested in preventing terrorism. They are only interested in instituting a totalitarian police state, using terrorism (which they allow to happen) as an excuse.

69 posted on 07/21/2002 11:04:30 AM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson