I would have loved to have heard the attorney's explanation for his conduct, in his own words.
1 posted on
07/16/2002 10:02:53 AM PDT by
wimpycat
To: one_particular_harbour; Constitution Day
I'm still trying to think of something clever to say about this, which is a shame because this story has so many possibilities.
2 posted on
07/16/2002 10:04:28 AM PDT by
wimpycat
To: wimpycat
What kind of 22 year old woman allows something like this to happen? There's more to this story........
4 posted on
07/16/2002 10:05:35 AM PDT by
basil
To: wimpycat
7 posted on
07/16/2002 10:07:05 AM PDT by
mikeb704
To: wimpycat
This guy watched too many Ally McBeal episodes.
8 posted on
07/16/2002 10:07:51 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
To: wimpycat
The difference being, hooker will do this for less and always stops screwing you when the hour is up.
11 posted on
07/16/2002 10:14:22 AM PDT by
Gumlegs
To: wimpycat
"The spanking was supposedly to prepare her for court testimony."And it was only when, after being sworn in at trial, she dropped her drawers and bent over the witness stand that she realized her attorney had not been entirely forthright.
To: wimpycat
"...Altschuler, who agreed to a $250,000 settlement...."I guess he settled instead of pursuing the, "Look how she was dressed - she deserved it!" defense.
13 posted on
07/16/2002 10:17:19 AM PDT by
ez2muz
To: wimpycat
Altschuler removed her panties, took her across his knee, and repeatedly slapped her bottom. Now I regret not going to law school.
14 posted on
07/16/2002 10:24:21 AM PDT by
Drango
To: wimpycat
From another article about the same case:
The lawyer then claimed he had no assets and the former client tried to collect from New York-based American Home Insurance Co., with whom the lawyer had a malpractice policy.
American Home refused to pay, persuading the judge the woman had not alleged the lawyer breached his duty to properly prepare her for trial but, rather, sought to recover claims for an assault that was not covered by the malpractice policy.
"The profession of the practice of law is hardly revered," American Home argued. "Sexual assault cannot be brought under the canopy of professional services. The perverted act of intentionally fondling the bare bottoms of female clients cannot and is not part of the practice of law."
Do you think Clinton would have fought to keep his bar license if he had known?
To: wimpycat
This is about the craziest thing I have read all day!!!! Just when I THOUGHT I had heard everything!!!!!
18 posted on
07/16/2002 10:47:05 AM PDT by
buffyt
To: wimpycat
"The spanking was supposedly to prepare her for court testimony. "
And it surely did!
20 posted on
07/16/2002 10:53:01 AM PDT by
APBaer
To: wimpycat
I say this lawyer will now reform.
Before you can turn your life around, you have to hit bottom first.
21 posted on
07/16/2002 10:55:57 AM PDT by
Ken H
To: wimpycat
She later sued Altschuler"Oldschooler", how appropriate!
To: wimpycat
Back in my lawyer days, I had a few clients I wanted to smack up side their heads, but never on their fannies. Ewwwww.
To: wimpycat
the term 'cramming for the bar' needs to be in there somewhere.
To: wimpycat
Did it get to the bottom of the case?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson