Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Security Council to debate International Criminal Court immunity issue
sg.news.yahoo.com/ ^ | Tuesday July 9 | news.yahoo.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 1:00:45 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate

UN Security Council to debate International Criminal Court immunity issue

The UN Security Council is to discuss in open session Wednesday US demands for immunity for its citizens from prosecution by the International Criminal Court, diplomatic sources said.

The date for the open debate, requested last Wednesday by Canada, was set Monday in closed Security Council discussions, the sources said.

"It is difficult to imagine an issue on which the appropriately of the Council's hearing the views of the memberships is more compelling," said Canadian Ambassador Paul Heinbecker. The United States is threatening to oppose the renewal of UN peacekeeping operations unless UN personnel, including the so-called "blue helmet" soldiers, are exempted from prosecution in the court, which came into being on July 1.

The first permanent court to try war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, the ICC is expected to start work in The Hague in about a year.

"The US delegation are going to have to spend a day listening to the criticisms of their position on the International Criminal Court and their threats to United Nation's peace keeping operations," said a diplomat on the condition of anonymity.

The US opposition to the courts, created by the treaty of Rome and ratified by 76 countries to date, is a lonely stance, with most of its traditionally allies lining up behind the courts.

In an attempt to illustrate Washington's point of view, the US delegation vetoed a renewal of the Bosnian peacekeeping forces, before accepting two extensions. The United States contributes personnel, including "blue helmet" soldiers to the mission in Bosnia.

The second extension, which came late Wednesday, extended the peacekeeping mission by two weeks just five hours before its mandate ran out.

The US position risks the closure of all 15 peacekeeping missions as each mandate comes to term and expires. Currently the United Nations helps to keep the peace in: Bosnia; the Democratic Republic of Congo; Ethiopia/Eritrea; Sierra Leone; Western Sahara; East Timor; India/Pakistan (Kashmir); Cyprus, Georgia; Kosovo; Prevlaka Peninsula (Croatia/Yugoslavia); Golan Heights (Israel); Iraq/Kuwait; Lebanon; in addition to a general Middle East force.

The United States contributes 25 percent of the UN peacekeeping budget, and has also threatened to withdraw some or all of that funding over the ICC.

The missions employ 45,000 people including 700 US nationals.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: icc; nwo; unlist; worldcourt

1 posted on 07/10/2002 1:00:45 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
"The US delegation are going to have to spend a day listening to the criticisms of their position on the International Criminal Court and their threats to United Nation's peace keeping operations," said a diplomat on the condition of anonymity.

And after we spend the day "listening to the criticisms" we'll veto the peacekeeping missions. Sorry guys, we're not going to blink on this one.

2 posted on 07/10/2002 1:09:55 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
This is a typical UN issue. The UN takes positions solely to give third world UN managers and UN politicians an opportunity to attract bribes, kickbacks, and payoffs. Every time they put some 1st world, especially, US asset or concept in jeopardy, it represents the likelihood that cash will pass under the table.

"Our judge on the panel will certainly absolve the US soldier if the US agrees to fund the dam on the xxx River (which members of my tribe will pay me a cut to build)."

When will some media type or think tank do a study of the clintonian corruption in the UN? The NYT is right there and the evidence is obvious to anyone who cares to see. Just start with the DPL limos who drop off kids at the pricey schools on the bluff up above Van Cortland Park. How do they afford that kind of tuition for their kids and the children of their mistresses?

3 posted on 07/10/2002 1:09:59 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
The Europeans and other critics should feel free to step in and pay for and man these peacekeeping missions themselves if they want to expose their people to the courts. Anyone? Anyone?
4 posted on 07/10/2002 1:12:09 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
"The US delegation are going to have to spend a day listening to the criticisms of their position on the International Criminal Court and their threats to United Nation's peace keeping operations," said a diplomat on the condition of anonymity.

Sounds like a good day to walk out.

5 posted on 07/10/2002 1:14:25 PM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
I agree. It's not the US taxpayers job to fund a world police system anyway. Bring em all home and let the third world sort out their own political/economic issues.
6 posted on 07/10/2002 1:16:44 PM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steve50
No U.S.A. = No U.N. unless France is going to fill in the gap.

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Yea sure they will.

7 posted on 07/10/2002 1:21:41 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
The ICC is a joke no matter what happens. If Americans can't be prosecuted, then the court loses all credibility as a fair and impartial instrument of justice. If Americans can be prosecuted, then we will be subjected to an endlest number of fraudulent charges stemming from fine, upstanding international citizens, such as Saddam Hussein, and an endless number of Euroweenies getting their ugly faces in the paper by prosecuting evil agents of the Imperialist Hegemonist American Hyperpower. Basically, we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. Staying as far away from this scam as possible is our best option.

If Europe new how to grant their colonies independence or draw borders during peace negotiations, we wouldn't have anywhere near as much of a mess to clean up for them.

8 posted on 07/10/2002 1:39:59 PM PDT by ConservativeNewsNetwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *UN_List; *"NWO"; madfly
Index Bump and fyi
9 posted on 07/10/2002 1:43:47 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsNetwork; 24Karet
Your post bears repeating. Reasoned analysis bump.
10 posted on 07/10/2002 4:43:53 PM PDT by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
The U.S. position on the ICC shouldn't even be fodder for debate. The U.S. administration said it does not recognize its authority. Americans who know what it's all about do not recognize its authority. No ICC. Not today, not tomorrow, not ever.
11 posted on 07/10/2002 5:28:01 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson