Skip to comments.
FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN
judicialwatch ^
| 6/22/2002
| For Immediate Release
Posted on 06/20/2002 3:33:10 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 501-509 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Indeed, as the district court pointed out, the statute would appear to permit representation of private individuals as long as a government interest is at stake. Hall II, 143 F. Supp. 2d at 4 (citing Brawer v. Horowitz, 535 F.2d 830, 834 (3d Cir. 1976) (it "approaches the frivolous" to argue that "the Department of Justice possesses no statutory or regulatory authority [under section 517] to represent a non-government defendant in a civil case")). Therefore, even if Clinton were a purely private citizen at all times relevant to Hall's suit--and, arguably, she was not *fn4--it was well within the DOJ's discretion to determine that the United States has (and continues to have) an interest in representing the former First Lady in litigation based upon actions she allegedly undertook while at the White House.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
If you've got something to say to me, say it online; the last time I talked to you in private freepmail you told somebody I threatened you; I'm not taking that chance again.
202
posted on
06/20/2002 11:16:34 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
You know what? He is opening up an office in Chicago and others elsewhere in the future; Judicial Watch needs to prepare financially for these ventures.
Also, as with any other non-profit organization, if they expect to survive at all, their assets must exceed their liabilities.
To: Howlin
What I think is that some people are getting some bad information somewhere.Here's what I think: Some people are so eager and determined to fan the flames of hysteria and dissatisfaction with the Bush presidency that they spin nearly everything he does to make it into something negative. This bit with the DOJ is a perfect example. You'd think Bush ordered this personally and was doing it out of some secret love for The Beast. As if!
To: Howlin
You know what Howlin? I still have that Freepmail and made copies of it.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I have mine, too.
206
posted on
06/20/2002 11:23:26 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Which is fine. I never threatened you. You called me a shill in that letter and then claimed that you would pass my information along to the ACU, insinuating that you would make it hard for me to get a job. Good luck trying to defend that move on your part Howlin.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I stated a fact: you were slandering David Keene. And I told you you might want to rethink your position, since you told me you were interested in getting a job in D.C.
208
posted on
06/20/2002 11:28:54 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
You told me to re-think my position by telling me that you were going to pass my information along to the ACU, insinuating that you were going to make it hard for me to get a job. Like I said Howlin, when you wrote me that Freepmail, you sort of scared me, so I passed the letter on.
Howlin, believe it or not, you have absolutely zero control over what happens in my life.
To: Howlin
Well, David Keene is not the President of the ACU any longer. And I wasn't slandering David Keene, I was telling the other side of what went on at C-PAC.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Characterize it however you want; and if I scared you, it was because the things you posted were not true -- I believe I even told you that there were people on this site that actually were there and knew what happened so you might want to be careful about what you said, in the interest of your own credibility.
211
posted on
06/20/2002 11:34:52 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Fine and believe it or not, I was listening to you, until you threatened to turn in my information to the ACU.
Howlin, if you really want me to listen to you or to even believe what you say, you have to understand that you were not going about it the right way with those veiled threats. You, having been a mother, should know that.
Yes, I know that I am young and still have a lot to learn in life, but please understand my point of view for once.
To: Howlin
Obviously we do not agree on the David Keene subject, fine. I prefer to leave it at that. You respect your sources, I respect mine (Judicial Watch ad). Please understand that.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
That is the second time you have brought up my son and me "having been a mother."
You are not quite what you appear to be. And that is NOT discussing politics.
214
posted on
06/20/2002 11:42:07 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
There are many subjects on this forum that aren't necessarily political.
You always seem to have this notion that I am someone else, things aren't as complicated as they seem.
To: Howlin
You told me about your son, remember?
To: Howlin
I do not believe in playing the facade game Howlin, and I do not believe that you do either.
I just am who I am, perhaps that is what is so hard for you to believe.
To: FreedominJesusChrist; ned; VA Advogado
I did a "search" of this thread and cannot find the word "BeAChooser". Help?
To: FreedominJesusChrist; deport; ned
I don't think ANYONE is taking cheap SHOTS at anyone here.
Let's stay ON topic and not get into a PISSING match over something that NO ONE on this thread understands, including ME.
by the way, my name is RON BROWN.
Put that in your pipe and SMOKE it.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
I have dents in my montior from reading this thread.
RiDiCuLoUs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 501-509 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson