Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Algore (Say's Rush Limbaugh, Political issue for leftists)
rushlimbaugh ^ | 6/3/2002 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/03/2002 5:08:19 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Dane
Come on Dane who has enacted more liberalism?

George W

or

Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Hillary Clinton combined?

It's a simple question, even you should be able to answer it.

21 posted on 06/03/2002 5:39:30 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
The rat plan is to depress turnout by rightist voters, by inducing apathy through disillusion. Don't get hooked by their net. SEND THE DEMOCRATS PACKING IN NOVEMBER!
22 posted on 06/03/2002 5:41:48 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rintense
There's joy in Mudville today, my dear.
23 posted on 06/03/2002 5:42:56 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Go to Rush's links and you will find that the report is not there. Rush didn't read the actual report, but relied on the Times article for his bushwhacking. Here it is: http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/publications/car

This report is not a policy document, but is bureaucratic exercise required by the Rio treaty where our bureaucracy reports to the UN bureaucracy on global warming. This report supports Bush's present policy, rejects the Kyoto Protocal and reiterates that the science has not been able to tell us if the warming is due primarily to man-made versus natural causes, if the warming is a problem at all or what the magnitude of that problem might be. There is no flip-flop.

The Times piece is a hit-piece spinning the report as some kind of admission the left has been correct on global warming, which it is not, in the hopes of changing policy.

I think Rush spent Sunday on the golf course and relied completely on the Times story for his prep. But it makes good radio - spawned one column today already and who knows how many FR threads.

24 posted on 06/03/2002 5:43:40 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
This is where some conservatives want to stop being logical and prudent, and start being evangelical. You oppose Bush saying "The Saudis are our friends." Saudi Arabia has been a crucial part of our Middle East strategy for DECADES. We have bases there. We have used those bases a lot. There are tensions and you might like to bomb them, but that is not rational. Reaffirming our friendship with Saudi Arabia was a rational thing for the President to do.
25 posted on 06/03/2002 5:44:00 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Nonetheless, I intend to vote on November, but if the strategerie doesn't change after that, I'm not going to the polls in '04

There will always be enough voters that will take this approach. Remember the "Reagan Revolution?" Open up an Almanac and check out the "Budget." Look at where it was when Reagan was elected and look where it is now.

How many more "victories" can conservatives afford?

26 posted on 06/03/2002 5:45:38 PM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What does Say's mean? It belongs to Say? Say is?
27 posted on 06/03/2002 5:46:42 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
And considering that O'Reilly just ripped Rush in his talking points, this is becoming more and more about ratings, not conservative ideas.

How absurd. The man is defending conservatism, nothing more nothing kless (he did it when Daddy Bush was there too didn't he? Or did you forget?

O'reilly hasn't got squat to do with it. Your silly red herrings only make you look foolish.

28 posted on 06/03/2002 5:46:47 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
SEND THE DEMOCRATS PACKING IN NOVEMBER!

When the Democrats were in power, the Republicans were very effective obstuctionists for a while. Unfortunately asn stupidly they boasted about how weak-willed Bill the Waffler was. Then he grew some stones and whipped the Congress over the next few years.

Now we have a Republican in the White House who is advancing the Democratic agenda faster than the Dems did and those of us tha tdon't like it get yelled at for being disloyal!

I think I like it better the other way, the Democrats taking credit for the Republican's accomplishments instead of the Republicans enacting the Democratic agenda.

Me vote Republican? Why?

29 posted on 06/03/2002 5:48:00 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
"He's turned his broken glass conservative base into a mess. Many, many of us are truly pissed off and feel betrayed."

Huh? No he hasn't. Bush's base is solid and behind him. Many, many of us are truly grateful he's our president.

As for Rush...I caught his show today for the first time in a long while...and he was so flat, boring and self serving I could only bear the first hour.

30 posted on 06/03/2002 5:48:05 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You have been right on target with this as the Klassless attacks by the KKKKKKers started:

TLB's right on target insight: The rat plan is to depress turnout by rightist voters, by inducing apathy through disillusion. Don't get hooked by their net. The rat plan is to depress turnout by rightist voters, by inducing apathy through disillusion. Don't get hooked by their net. SEND THE DEMOCRATS PACKING IN NOVEMBER!

It is obvious this is the Rat goal and the KKKKKK Klassless Klowns are doing their job to depress conservatives.

Ignore them and SEND THE DEMOCRATS PACKING IN NOVEMBER!

31 posted on 06/03/2002 5:50:39 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
O'reilly hasn't got squat to do with it. Your silly red herrings only make you look foolish.

Sorry, but it is Drudge's irresponsible headlines and his obvious trumping of Rush to support his own lack of reporting skills that makes them both look foolish. Funny, seems Bush supports are called bots. Seems like we have a new bot in town. Rushbots.

32 posted on 06/03/2002 5:50:46 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What is the real truth behind this whole story. I think it is the democrats plan to do this non-stop hits on Bush like the NYtimes story

Sorry to say but I am dissapointed (again) with GWB. If the story is wrong he could have sent someone out to contradict it. He has not done that.

33 posted on 06/03/2002 5:51:55 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Reaffirming our friendship with Saudi Arabia was a rational thing for the President to do.

"We shall make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them"--who said that????

34 posted on 06/03/2002 5:52:12 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
Like all mortal non scientists I have to form opinions over time by gleaningh trends from various sources. Some of the reported phenomena are cyclical, like Antarctic ice collapsing. But others appear to be changes in long term conditions, such as Alpine glaciers melting, measurements of average earth temperature, plants blooming earlier in the year. Even as I write this I am thinking I could be wrong, but again it's not a political issue with me.
35 posted on 06/03/2002 5:56:26 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Most definitely Rush is right. Here is the Bush EPA's words in their own report:

"Greenhouse gases are accumulating in the Earth's atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing global mean surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise," the administration said in its report.

"The changes observed over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a reflection of natural variability," the report says.

"Human-induced warming and associated sea level rises are expected to continue through the 21st century," it says. "Secondary effects...include increases in rainfall rates and increased susceptibility of semi-arid regions to drought."

36 posted on 06/03/2002 5:59:22 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I'll second that. Rush has shown a tremendous amount of principle and his show truly is one of the few outposts left for conservatism.
37 posted on 06/03/2002 6:02:02 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
OK, because the terrorists are in 60 countries, have fun attacking them all. It is not our policy to attack them all. It is our policy to give them a chance to cooperate with us. So far we have attacked one country, and we can only hope Saudi Arabia doesn't have to be the next one on our list.
38 posted on 06/03/2002 6:05:23 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rintense
"Rushbots."

GOOD one ;)

39 posted on 06/03/2002 6:08:25 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
O'Reilly's radio will be lucky to outlast Dr. Laura's TV show.
40 posted on 06/03/2002 6:10:28 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson