I don't think so. Genesis Chapter 1 verse 3, "And God said Let there be light: and there was light."
Badda bing, badda boom. The Big Bang. The rest of the days that follow don't concern me as far as this discussion is concerned.
Actually, He called for the light, and then he called for animales, and then He called for man. He did all of of these things in an orderly fashion.
Your theory implies that the presence of light led to the creaion of man, while the very One who created the light also made man. He did this in his own time, and man was not a direct result of the light.
Light was not the cause of man. God formed man from the dust of the earth, blew His breath ito Him, and man became a living sould.
Therefore, the light was not the big bang that led to the creation of man. It was only a thing which God did to promote man's creation.
Now, the burden is on you to show me from a biblical passage where the light led to man's creation through it's own action.
Before every thing God created, we see that He said, "Let there be ____".
The light never said that, did it?
Of course. You feel comfortable taking one verse out of its context and setting to use it as you wish, but far be it from me to use the subsequent verses to show how your interpretation of the Word of God is wrong.
Have you thought about how ridiculous your comment sounds?